Skip to main content

Table 3 Social determinants of access to quality 4+ ANC visits in Nepal, 2016 (N = 1401)

From: High coverage but low quality of maternal and newborn health services in the coverage cascade: who is benefitted and left behind in accessing better quality health services in Nepal?

Determinants

Categories

Frequency (n = 1401)

%

p

4+ ANC visits

Crude OR (95% CI)

4+ ANC visits

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

Structural

Wealth rank

Lower

539

61.5

0.242

1.00

 

Upper

862

65.6

 

1.19 (0.89,1.60)

 

Ethnicity

Disadvantaged

903

55.2

< 0.001

1.00

1.00

Advantaged

498

80.1

 

3.26 (2.39, 4.45)***

1.68 (1.16, 2.43)**

Religion

Others

186

59.3

0.333

1.00

 

Hindu

1215

64.8

 

1. 26 (0.79–2.02)

 

Occupation

Not working

622

58.8

0.003

1.00

 

Agriculture

596

65.7

 

1.35 (1.03,1.77)*

 

Working paid

183

76.4

 

2.27 (1.38, 3.74)**

 

Maternal education

Illiterate

305

47.9

< 0.001

1.00

 

Primary

249

58.7

 

1.55 (1.03, 2.34)*

 

Secondary higher

847

71.4

 

2.72 (1.92, 3.86)***

 

Decision-making

Yes

486

70.7

0.003

1.00

 

No

915

60.5

 

0.63 (0.47, 0.85)**

 

Intermediary

Language

Nepali

673

76.2

< 0.001

1.00

1.00

Maithili

244

31.7

 

0.14 (0.10, 0.22)***

0.42 (0.20, 0.88) *

Bhojpuri

121

55.5

 

0.39 (0.23, 0.64)***

1.01 (0.48, 2.14)

Others

363

65.9

 

0.60 (0.42, 0.87)**

0.82 (0.53, 1.25)

Residence

Urban

802

68.4

0.009

1.00

 

Rural

599

58.1

 

0.64 (0.46, 0.90)**

 

Province

One

266

59.7

< 0.001

1.00

1.00

Two

298

36.9

 

0.39 (0.24, 0.65)***

0.74 (0.37,1.49)

Bagmati

236

76.4

 

2.18 (1.31, 3.63)**

1.65 (0.97, 2.80)

Gandaki

124

78.1

 

2.41 (1.36, 4.28)**

1.69 (1.02, 2.79)*

Lumbini

272

71.9

 

1.72 (1.02, 2.92)*

1.47 (0.88, 2.46)

Karnali

66

68.7

 

1.48 (0.86, 2.56)

1.37 (0.77, 2.43)

Sudurpaschim

139

79.2

 

2.56 (1.57, 4.17)***

2.41 (1.46, 3.97)***

Region

Mountain

94

62.4

< 0.01

1.00

 

Hill

579

74.8

 

0.56 (0.30, 1.06)

 

Terai

728

55.7

 

0.42 (0.31, 0.58)***

 

Maternal age (years)

15–19

216

54.5

0.003

1.00

 

20–34

1120

66.4

 

1.65 (1.24, 2.21)***

 

35 + 

66

54.9

 

1.02 (0.55, 1.88)

 

Birth order

 < 4

1260

66.0

< 0.001

1.00

1.00

 ≥ 4

142

46.6

 

0.45 (0.31, 0.65)***

0.54 (0.35, 0.85) **

Sex of child (index child)

Male

756

65.3

0.337

1.00

 

Female

645

62.5

 

0.89 (0.69, 1.13)

 

Access to bank account

No

904

57.1

< 0.001

1.00

1.00

Yes

498

76.6

 

2.47 (1.83, 3.32)***

1.48 (1.08, 2.03) *

Media exposure

Yes

855

69.4

< 0.001

1.00

 

No

546

55.6

 

0.55 (0.42, 0.73)***

 

Last birth (index child)

Wanted

1149

64.9

0.229

1.00

 

Unwanted

252

60.1

 

0.81 (0.58, 1.14)

 

Distance to health facilities as a perceived problem

No problem

588

71.6

< 0.001

1.00

 

Problem

814

58.6

 

0.56 (0.42, 0.75)***

 

Health system

Perceived problem not having female providers

No problem

438

79.6

< 0.001

  

Problem

963

57.0

 

0.34 (0.24, 0.48)***

 

Awareness of health mothers' group in the community

Yes

497

71.6

< 0.001

1.00

 

No

904

59.9

 

0.59 (0.44, 0.80)***

 

C-section delivery

Yes

497

71.6

0.023

1.00

 

No

1235

62.8

 

0.62 (0.41, 0.94)*

 
  1. Significance at ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Hosmer Lemeshow test for the model fitness (p = 0.575)