Prevalence and correlates of reproductive coercion across ten sites: commonalities and divergence

Table 2 Factor loadings of individual reproductive coercion items and fit statistics for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), by site, among married or partnered women in need of contraception

	Burkina Faso (n = 2767)	Côte d'Ivoire (n = 1561)	Kongo Central DRC (n = 830)	Kinshasa DRC (n = 846)	Kenya (n = 4588)	Kano Nigeria (n = 535)	Lagos Nigeria (n = 612)	Niger (n = 1525)	Rajasthan, India (n = 3017)	Uganda (n = 2020)
Factor loadings
1. Made you feel bad or treated you badly for wanting to use a family planning method	0.77	0.84	0.81	0.77	0.85	0.94	0.85	0.75	0.78	0.85
2. Tried to force or pressure you to become pregnant	0.90	0.87	0.89	0.89	0.91	0.97	0.92	0.88	0.91	0.93
3. Said he would leave you if you did not get pregnant	0.96	0.97	0.97	0.95	0.97	0.93	0.98	0.80	0.87	0.98
4. Told you he would have a baby with someone else if you did not get pregnant	0.92	0.97	0.92	0.93	0.97	0.98	0.91	0.96	0.95	0.98
5. Taken away your family planning or kept you from going to the clinic to get family planning	0.72	0.81	0.91	0.76	0.89	0.98	0.94	0.97	0.82	0.85
Fit statistics
CFI	0.83	0.91	0.88	0.90	0.95	0.82	0.65	0.81	0.93	0.98
TLI	0.65	0.83	0.77	0.81	0.91	0.65	0.30	0.62	0.86	0.95
RMSEA	0.43	0.33	0.38	0.31	0.25	0.62	0.84	0.48	0.26	0.18
p(RMSEA)	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
SRMR	0.07	0.04	0.04	0.06	0.03	0.02	0.05	0.06	0.04	0.02
AIC	27,092	13,432	7212	8223	35,799	2805	4671	14,017	29,502	15,279
BIC	27,151	13,486	7260	8270	35,863	2848	4715	14,070	29,562	15,335
CD	0.96	0.98	0.97	0.96	0.98	0.99	0.98	0.97	0.95	0.98
Alpha (α)	0.87	0.66	0.83	0.89	0.80	0.68	0.89	0.70	0.68	0.73

Desirable indices from Schreiber el al. [23]: root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA < 0.06; Comparative Fit Index, CFI > 0.95; Tucker–Lewis Index, TLI > 0.96; standardized root mean residual, SRMR < 0.08; coefficient of determination (CD). internal reliability alpha (α): ≥ 0.70

ISSN: 1742-4755