Skip to main content

Table 4 Mixed-effects Poisson regression models assessing the effect of the RMA intervention on current modern family planning use and experience of IPV within the past year, by intervention arm

From: Effects of the reaching married adolescents program on modern contraceptive use and intimate partner violence: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial among married adolescent girls and their husbands in Dosso, Niger

 

Current modern family planning use, non-pregnant women only

Experience of IPV within past 12 months

Minimally adjusted

Adjusted

Minimally adjusted

Adjusted

aIRR

95% CI

p-value

aIRR

95% CI

p-value

aIRR

95% CI

p-value

aIRR

95% CI

p-value

Study arm × time interaction

 Arm 1 × follow-up

3.52

[1.39, 8.91]

0.01

3.65

[1.51, 8.78]

0.004

1.38

[0.48, 3.93]

0.55

1.39

[0.49, 3.95]

0.54

 Arm 2 × follow-up

1.32

[0.74, 2.33]

0.34

1.42

[0.84, 2.41]

0.19

0.40

[0.18, 0.89]

0.02

0.40

[0.18, 0.88]

0.02

 Arm 3 × follow-up

3.02

[1.68, 5.43]

< 0.001

2.99

[1.68, 5.32]

< 0.001

0.46

[0.21, 1.00]

0.051

0.46

[0.21, 1.01]

0.052

Study arm

  Control

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Arm 1—home visits only

0.26

[0.10, 0.71]

0.01

0.20

[0.08, 0.53]

0.001

0.69

[0.34, 1.40]

0.30

0.62

[0.29, 1.33]

0.22

  Arm 2—group sessions only

1.03

[0.49, 2.18]

0.93

0.97

[0.50, 1.87]

0.93

1.22

[0.65, 2.30]

0.53

1.39

[0.74, 2.62]

0.31

  Arm 3—home visits and group sessions

0.87

[0.44, 1.70]

0.68

0.82

[0.44, 1.52]

0.53

2.28

[1.20, 4.32]

0.01

2.39

[1.31, 4.36]

0.004

Time

  Baseline

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Follow-up

1.78

[1.20, 2.63]

0.004

1.73

[1.20, 2.51]

0.003

1.68

[0.96, 2.93]

0.07

1.68

[0.96, 2.92]

0.07

District

  Loga

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Doutchi

0.71

[0.31, 1.63]

0.42

0.62

[0.27, 1.42]

0.26

1.53

[1.12, 2.10]

0.01

1.22

[0.81, 1.84]

0.35

  Dosso

0.39

[0.18, 0.82]

0.01

0.35

[0.16, 0.74]

0.01

1.14

[0.69, 1.88]

0.61

0.99

[0.65, 1.49]

0.94

Demographics

 Wife age (years)

   

0.98

[0.91, 1.05]

0.51

   

0.92

[0.84, 1.01]

0.09

 Wife age at marriage (years)

   

1.04

[0.99, 1.10]

0.15

   

1.05

[0.96, 1.16]

0.29

 Wife education

  Any modern

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Quranic only

   

0.81

[0.60, 1.09]

0.16

   

1.00

[0.63, 1.58]

1.00

  No schooling

   

0.80

[0.66, 0.98]

0.03

   

0.84

[0.62, 1.14]

0.27

 Husband education

  Any modern

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Quranic only

   

0.76

[0.60, 0.96]

0.02

   

1.00

[0.68, 1.48]

1.00

  No schooling

   

0.75

[0.60, 0.94]

0.01

   

0.96

[0.68, 1.35]

0.81

 Wife parity

  None

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  1 birth

   

1.54

[1.24, 1.90]

< 0.001

   

0.87

[0.60, 1.24]

0.43

  2 or more births

   

2.62

[2.00, 3.43]

< 0.001

   

1.36

[0.92, 2.02]

0.13

 Husband monogamous or polygamous

  Monogamous

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Polygamous

   

1.17

[0.96, 1.42]

0.13

   

1.01

[0.73, 1.40]

0.95

 Husband spent > 3mos away from village last year

  No

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

   

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Yes

   

0.88

[0.73, 1.05]

0.16

   

1.06

[0.74, 1.53]

0.75

 Household assets

   

0.95

[0.89, 1.02]

0.18

   

0.90

[0.79, 1.02]

0.09

  1. All models include nested random effects of individual within village
  2. Village ICC for current contraceptive use: 0.006. Village ICC for past year IPV: < 0.001