Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the characteristics of the included studies

From: Stakeholders’ perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of maternity waiting homes: a qualitative synthesis

First author, year of publication

Study location

Study setting

Study design and participants in qualitative methods

Abdulkadir, 2017

Kenya

One MWH

Mixed method: KIIs, 25 FGDs with non-users, women of childbearing age who had already given birth to a first child

Bergen, 2019

Ethiopia

24 MWHs

Qualitative study: 31 IDIs with HEWs

Bonawitz, 2019

Zambia

Two MWHs

Mixed-method study: Pre- and post-intervention comparison with four FGDs with MWH users

Chibuye, 2018

Zambia

17 facilities with MWH

Mixed-method study: 25 FGDs, 87 KIIs with MWH users, non-MWH users, SMAGs and neighbourhood health committees, district community medical officers/ nursing officers, health facility in-charges, senior women, partner agencies staff supporting RMNCH, women with spouse

Clensay, 2007

Nicaragua

One MWH

Qualitative study: 11 IDIs (MWH users, MWH staff, health workers, diplomat, FGD (MWH users), participant observations

Friedman, 2008

Nicaragua

One MWH

Qualitative study: IDIs (three MWH users, seven members of the staff team, three representatives of other non-profit organizations working in alliance with the MWH. Casual conversations with staff, pregnant women, participants in educational programmes)

Garcia Prado, 2012

Nicaragua

14 SILAIS

Mixed-method study: semi-structured surveys with KIIs and IDIs (12 MWH's support committee, 11 health workers, eight members of civil society organizations, eight local authorities, 10 community leaders

Gaym, 2012

Ethiopia

Three MWHs

Mixed-method study: FGDs (74 MWH users), site visits and documentation

JarquĂ­n, 2015

Nicaragua

One MWH

Qualitative study: 38 semi-structured interviews (15 women users, 10 companions, 10 visitors of the women at homes), 4 FGDs (women and companions)

Kaiser, 2019

Zambia

10 rural health centres and 10 MWHs

Longitudinal qualitative study: 94 IDIs (nurses, midwives, non-skilled birth attendants, in-charge, district health officers)

Kebede, 2020

Ethiopia

Eight MWHs

Qualitative study: four FGDs (MWH users) and 18 IDIs (clinicians, HEWs, MWH non-users), observations of MWHs using checklists and field notes

Kyokan, 2016

Sierra Leone

10 MWHs

Qualitative study: two FGDs (non-users), IDIs (eight users, four non-users), KIIs (one HPA manager, four BWH hosts, one assistant community leader, one community health volunteer, one community health volunteer and village development committee), document review, assessment of MWHs

Lori, 2013a

Liberia

Four catchment areas with MWHs

Qualitative study: eight FGDs (MWH users, MWH non-users, family members of MWH users, or family members of non-MWH users) and 12 IDIs (10 clinic staff, one NGO staff, one Ministery of Health and Social Welfare staff)

Lori, 2013b

Liberia

Five health facilities with an MWH, five without an MWH

Mixed-method study: FGDs (46 traditional midwives) and logbook data collection

Lori, 2016

Zambia

Five health facilities with MWHs and 10 health facilities without MWHs

Qualitative study: IDI with semi-structured interview guide and 47 FGDs (46 community leaders and 500 SMAGs, husbands and women of childbearing age)

Lori, 2017

Liberia

Six MWHs: five receiving the newly built MWH intervention

Mixed-method study: secondary analysis of patient satisfaction and 60 semi-structured interviews (16 TBAs, five community midwives, 38 MWH users)

Lori, 2020

Liberia

119 MWHs (all MWHs in Liberia)

Mixed-method study: 113 IDIs (health providers), 115 FGDs (196 MWH users, 298 MWH non-users, 205 male partners, 82 chiefs, 163 community leaders, 221 TBAs), logbook reviews, Geographic Information System

Med solidar

Mozambique, Chiure

One MWH

Mixed-method study: semi-structured interviews, IDIs and FGDs (730 MWH users and non-users)

Mramba, 2010

Kenya

One MWH

Mixed-method study: 30 IDIs (MWH users)

Pujiharti, 2019

Indonesia

One MWH

Qualitative study: nine IDIs and FGDs (two MWH users, six health workers, two NGO members), observation study of relevant documents

Ruiz, 2013

Guatemala

Two MWHs

Qualitative study: 48 IDIs (18 MWH users, influential family members, four community leaders, five MWH administrative medical staff, seven comadronas, two medical staff from health centres, one district-level representative, six medical personnel from hospitals

Schooley, 2009

Guatemala

One MWH

Qualitative study: IDIs and three FGDs (21 MWH users and TBAs, 17 female advocates of the MWH, 12 male advocates, including spouses, NGO staff and community health workers), observations

Scott, 2018

Zambia

Four MWHs

Mixed-method study: 17 FGDs (33 women, 32 men, 38 TBA/SMAG, 32 mothers-in-law), 38 KIIs (16 health facility staff, nine CHWs, four traditional leaders, five community leaders, four community members), FL (59 women, 53 men and 55 elders)

Shresta, 2007

Nepal

Seven PHI: four sub-health posts, two health posts, and one PHCC

Qualitative study: 18 IDIs (MWH non-users) and 28 FDGs (communities, staff and chairpersons of management committee of health institutions)

Sialubanje, 2015

Zambia

One MWH and two health facilities without MWH

Qualitative study: 32 IDIs (six MWH users and 24 non-users)

Sialubanje, 2016

Zambia

Seven different health centers, villages, and families

Qualitative study: 24 IDIs (11 male partners of MWH users and 13 male partners of non-users)

Sitefane, 2013

Mozambique

Nine MWHs

Qualitative study: 32 FGDs (women in reproductive age, community leaders (men) and their counsellors)

Sri Hilmi, 2020

Indonesia

Two subdistricts with MWHs

Qualitative study: IDIs and FGDs (10 MWH non-users)

Sundu, 2017

Malawi

One hospital

Qualitative study: IDIs (15 MWH users)

Suwedi-Kapesa, 2018

Malawi

Three MWHs

Qualitative study: with six IDIs (health workers (three nurses, midwife, technicians), three guards and four FGDs (27 MWH users)

Tiruneh, 2016

Ethiopia

MWHs

Mixed-method study: 21 IDIs and surveys with open-ended questions (14 MWH users, six male partners of MWH users)

Urwin, 2017

Malawi

One MWH

Qualitative study: 6 IDIs and one FGD (six MWH users)

Van Rijn, 2013

Tanzania

One MWH

Mixed-method study: 25 semi-structured interviews (10 MWH users, eight MWH non-users, seven health workers)

Vermeiden, 2018

Ethiopia

One MWH

Mixed-methods study: FGDs (28 MWH users), seven IDIs (staff and users), document review

Vermeiden, 2019

Ethiopia

One MWH

Qualitative study: 33 IDIs and five FGDs (43 community members and 31 health workers)

Vian, 2017

Zambia

Four health facilities with MWHs and villages in each catchment area

Mixed-methods study: 16 FGDs (135 women who gave birth in the past 24 months, men with child under 24 months and community elders)

Wester, 2018

Ethiopia

Afar Regional Health Bureau

Qualitative study: 12 IDIs (health workers and gender experts with a formal university education)

Wilson, 1997

Ghana

One MWH

Qualitative study: 20 FGDs (57 community men, 52 community women, 14 trained TBAs, 24 hospital staff, eight Ghana Private Road Transport Union executives, eight relatives of women admitted with complications

  1. BWH Birth Waiting Home, CRHCs Community Rural Health Centre, KIIs key-informant interviews, DCMOs District Community Medical Officers, FGDs focus group discussions, IDIs in-depth interviews, NGO non-governmental organization, SILAIS local systems of integrated health care at the regional level, SMAGs Safe Motherhood Action groups, SNNP Southern Nations Nationalities and People, TBAs traditional birth attendants