Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients among three protocols

From: Analysis of cumulative live birth rate outcomes of three ovarian stimulation protocols in patients after laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarial endometrioma: a retrospective cohort study

Item

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation group

GnRH-antagonist group

Microstimulation group

Z/x2 value

P value

No. of oocytes retrieved

4.31 ± 2.01

7.42 ± 5.17bc

3.88 ± 2.31

8.512

P < 0.001

Oocytes output rate (%)

63.2 (96/152)

57.9 (136/235)

91.2(52/57)ac

22.208

P < 0.001

No.2PN

3.39 ± 1.69

5.11 ± 4.09bc

2.67 ± 2.06

5.595

0.005

Available embryo rate (%)

83.6 (102/122)

90.2 (120/133)

90.9 (50/64)

3.216

0.200

High-quality embryo rate (%)

54.9 (67/122)

46.6(62/133)bc

29.7(19/64)c

10.749

0.005

Blastocyst formation rate (%)

65.2 (30/46)

57.8 (48/83)

50.0 (11/22)

1.518

0.468

Clinical pregnancy rate (%)

44.7 (17/38)

55.6 (15/27)

29.2 (7/24)

3.617

0.164

Cumulative live birth rate (%)

34.2(13/38)

48.1 (13/27)

20.8 (4/24)

4.188

0.123

  1. aComparison with GnRH-antagonist group
  2. bComparison with microstimulation group
  3. cComparison with PPOS group