From: Assessing the relationship between reproductive autonomy and contraceptive use in rural Malawi
 | Unadjusted model OR 95% CI | Adjusted for sociodemographic and partnership characteristics OR 95% CI | Adjusted for sociodemographic, partnership, and pregnancy intention OR 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
Freedom from coercion models | |||
 RA Freedom from Coercion Subscale | 1.15** 1.05–1.26 | 1.16*** 1.07–1.26 | 1.13* 1.03–1.23 |
 Number of living children | – | 1.24 0.93–1.66 | 1.09 0.83–1.44 |
 Employed in past 3 months for wages | – | 0.45* 0.26–0.77 | 0.51* 0.28–0.92 |
 Education | – | 0.99 0.91–1.07 | 0.95 0.88–1.03 |
 Wealth score | – | 1.16 0.95–1.41 | 1.23 0.98–1.53 |
 Relationship status |  |  |  |
  Married with one partner |  | Ref. | Ref. |
  Married with more than one partner | – | 0.90 0.39–2.08 | 0.81 0.36–1.29 |
  In a relationship/engaged |  | 0.43 0.14–1.31 | 0.40 0.13–0.63 |
  Intends to get pregnant in next 12 months | – | – | 0.21*** 0.11–0.39 |
Communication models | |||
 RA Communication subscale | 1.14* 1.02–1.28 | 1.16* 1.02–1.30 | 1.10 0.97–1.25 |
 Number of living children | – | 1.23 0.91–1.66 | 1.08 0.89–1.31 |
 Employed in past 3 months for wages | – | 0.44* 0.26–0.74 | 0.55 0.27–1.11 |
 Education | – | 1.00 0.91–1.09 | 0.95 0.86–1.05 |
 Wealth score | – | 1.15 0.96–1.39 | 1.23* 1.01–1.50 |
 Relationship status |  |  |  |
  Married with one partner |  | Ref. | Ref. |
  Married with more than one partner | – | 0.93 0.42–2.04 | 0.83 0.39–1.77 |
  In a relationship/engaged |  | 0.46 0.16–1.30 | 0.43 0.17–1.10 |
  Intends to get pregnant in next 12 months | – | – | 0.17*** (0.09–0.33) |