Skip to main content

Reviewer acknowledgements

The work done by reviewers is one of the most generous contributions to science. The role of peer review is crucial for the dissemination of new findings and the continued progress of science. The list of the contributors of reviewers to Reproductive Health shows the names of prominent and generous scientists who gave us detailed, constructive reviews and revisions, which have allowed us to efficiently evaluate submissions and publish high-quality articles.

We and the scientific community are very grateful for their contributions, which will improve health outcomes and quality of life in communities throughout the world.    

We consider the reviewing of articles to be a significant academic effort that should be recognized by academic institutions and included in professionals' curricula vitae. Reproductive Health publishes open peer review reports that can be linked to and listed in CVs.

We wish to express our sincere gratitude for the efforts of all our reviewers and we appreciate your continued commitment to the journal.






Annual Journal Metrics

  • 2022 Citation Impact
    3.4 - 2-year Impact Factor
    4.2 - 5-year Impact Factor
    1.657 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    1.093 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    2023 Speed
    18 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    166 days submission to accept (Median)

    2023 Usage 
    1,524 Altmetric mentions

Reaction to the 2024 Alabama Supreme Court ruling on IVF

Read the blog by Gwendolyn P. Quinn & Laura Kimberly on the Alabama Supreme Court ruling on IVF and what it means for women with cancer.

Engaging with African feminist interpretations of the Maternal

Read the blog by Ogochukwu Udenigwe on interpretations of motherhood and its relationship with patriarchal culture among African feminists.