- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Salient beliefs towards vaginal delivery in pregnant women: A qualitative study from Iran
© Rahnama et al. 2016
- Received: 2 October 2014
- Accepted: 14 January 2016
- Published: 23 January 2016
Childbirth by cesarean section has increased at an alarming rate over the past few years in Iran. The present study was designed to explore pregnant women’s beliefs about the mode of delivery in order to provide some suggestions for future interventions to increase vaginal delivery.
This was a qualitative study framed by the Theory of Planned Behavior conducted in Tehran, Iran in 2013. Pregnant women attending public hospitals were recruited. The data were collected via in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Interviews were conducted in a semi-structured manner. All interviews were tape recorded and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis approach was used to explore the data.
In all 36 pregnant women participated in the study. The mean age of women was 27.8 (SD = 4.5) years. In general, women preferred vaginal delivery. During interviews and focus group discussions several themes emerged related to the pain associated with vaginal delivery, fears of childbirth, related health concerns, and the role of decision makers. The findings were grouped into three main themes namely: behavioral beliefs (negative and positive beliefs towards outcomes of vaginal delivery), normative beliefs (injunctive norms and descriptive norms), and control beliefs (internal and external barriers).
Despite the fact that there were positive beliefs regarding vaginal delivery, participants indicated concerns related to loss of control and fear. It is essential that health care providers realize the psychological needs of women during pregnancy and the need for continuous support during childbirth. This type of support may improve their self-control during labor, and decrease fear of childbirth.
- Cesarean section
- Theory of Planned Behavior
- Normal vaginal delivery
The cesarean section rate with no medical indication continues to rise in Iran dramatically. According to the Iranian Demographic Health Survey (IDHS) carried out in October 2000, the rate of cesarean section was reported as high as 35 % ; however a recent meta-analysis of 34 studies estimated a cesarean rate of 48 % in Iran . This is an important public health concern as cesarean section is significantly associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity [3–5].
Apart from the medical or obstetrical indications, the choice of mode of delivery may be influence by other factors. Two dominant explanations for these decisions have been raised in the literature: women’s preference for cesarean delivery and service providers’ behaviors [6, 7]. Although a number of studies have highlighted women’s preference for elective cesarean section [8, 9], there is little information regarding women’s beliefs and attitudes towards vaginal delivery . Most existing is quantitative, cross-sectional in nature, and mainly focuses on women’s preference and associated factors derived from statistical analyses [11, 12].
A few qualitative studies looked at women’s beliefs regarding vaginal delivery. For instance, a qualitative study in Argentina of 29 nulliparous women revealed that most women preferred vaginal delivery. The study used a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory and revealed that most women preferred vaginal delivery due to cultural, personal, and social factors and it was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. The study found that women viewed pain associated with vaginal delivery positively, while they viewed cesarean section as a medical decision . Similarly an investigation from Northern Iran studying 12 pregnant women, 10 women with previous experience of childbirth, seven midwives, seven obstetricians, and nine non-pregnant women and using a ethnographic approach found that cultural beliefs, values and traditions significantly affected individuals’ attitudes towards the mode of delivery, definitions of different modes, and the decisions they made or would make in the future in this regard . Interestingly a study from Sanandaj interviewed 22 Kurdish pregnant women in their third trimester and found that 18 preferred vaginal delivery while four preferred cesarean section. The authors identified four explanations for these preferences: safety of baby, fear of surgery, previous experience and social support . A mixed method study in Tehran using the extended parallel process model (EPPM) reported that there was insufficiently knowledge and wide misconceptions regarding modes of delivery, which influenced the choice of method for delivery. Results of this study also showed that self-confident women were more likely to plan to deliver vaginally .
Pregnant women’s beliefs in relation to vaginal delivery are important factor when developing interventions to reduce unnecessary cesarean sections, especially if a theory-driven approach could be applied. Thus, the present study aimed to explore pregnant women’s beliefs regarding vaginal delivery using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a framework.
The Theory of Planned Behavior is a social cognitive model of decision-making that provides a useful framework for explaining health behaviors [17, 18]. The TPB suggests the central determinant of behavior is the intention to perform a given behavior. The three core components to predict intention according to TPB are attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control (PBC).
The attitude refers to behavioral beliefs about a particular outcome. The subjective norms refers to whether it is believed that others will approve or disapprove of the behavior Perceived behavioral control refers to beliefs surrounding factors likely to facilitate or inhibit the behavior [17, 18].
Design and data collection
This was a qualitative study framed by the Theory of Planned Behavior in Tehran, Iran in 2013. The data were collected using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with pregnant women. Participants were recruited from pregnant women attending public hospitals willing to participate. Recruitment of participants for the in-depth interviews (n = 16) and the focus group discussions (n = 20) were based on purposeful sampling. Pregnant women were included if they were: 18–35 years old; over 32 weeks of gestational age; without complication during pregnancy; and without preexisting medical illness. In-depth interviews were conducted in a semi-structured manner. Interviews focused on the perceived outcomes of vaginal delivery. The outcomes included the woman’s positive or negative beliefs of having a vaginal delivery. Also, we asked women to indicate how other people, who may be in some ways important to them, would approve or disapprove of vaginal delivery. Finally women were asked about factors that might inhibit or facilitate vaginal delivery. The duration of interviews ranged from 35 to 45 min. The data collection was continued until data were considered saturated and no new data were emerging. Also two focus group discussions consisting of 10 pregnant women each (n = 20) were held. The focus group discussions had an open and semi-structured contradict each other; either it was unstructured or semi-structured, each lasting approximately 60 to 70 min, and began with a few general questions to initiate conversation. Focus group facilitators used probes as necessary to provoke discussions. Participants were encouraged to talk freely and not to hesitate in sharing their experience and feelings.
All in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed subsequently. PR (a female midwife and doctorate in health education) and KM (a female midwife and reproductive health expert) both with experience in conducting qualitative studies carried out interviews and focus group discussions. There was no relationship between interviewers and participants. All interviews and focus group discussions were carried out in a private setting in the hospitals.
The ethics committee of Shahed University approved the study. We obtained written informed consent from participants after comprehensive explanation of procedure involved.
The characteristics of the study sample
Previous method of delivery
Themes and sub-themes
Positive behavioral beliefs
Negative behavioral beliefs
Positive behavioral beliefs
Rostam’s mother was Rudaba. Rudaba’s labor of Rostam was prolonged due to the extraordinary size of her baby. Zal her lover and husband, was certain that his wife would die in labor. Rudaba was near death when Zal decided to summon the Simurgh (a benevolent, mythical flying creature). The Simurgh appeared and instructed him upon how to perform a ‘Rostamzad’ or ‘Rostamineh’ (Persian equivalent for cesarean section), thus saving Rudaba and the child .
Generally I want to say that I think natural delivery is the best way since it is the traditional way. I think we should not be frightening pregnant women saying that normal delivery has pain. Most young women say they are afraid of natural delivery because they feel they might suffer from a lot of pain. (32-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 2)
A friend said that she would never regret for vaginal delivery. She was telling me that she never suffered from wound and scar. She said that you only experience pain for some hours and then a weak after you are yourself and could do your chores (25-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 1)
In natural delivery you experience pain only for hours, just for an hour or less; then you will forget everything. (26-old-year, higher education, employed, gravidity 2)
This is the pain of natural delivery that brings health. Such pain does not matter since cesarean deliveries bring so many problems to women. (29-old-year, higher education, employed, gravidity 2)
I was ready to tolerate pain but instead do natural delivery because I knew that after one week the pain would gone and I would enjoy my delivery. I believe in ‘no pain, no gain’ idiom. Suffering is needed to become a mother right from a beginning (26-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 2)
My preference for normal delivery is that I believe God had some good reasons for vaginal delivery. It seems that there should be some positive hidden reasons for mother and baby in natural delivery. When a woman tolerates pain in natural delivery, her sin will be forgiven. This is why it is said that the paradise is under mothers’ feet. (35-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 1)
Relatives say that in natural delivery everything including blood and infectious materials in the womb will come out, but in cesarean the infectious materials will lessen slowly through afterward bleeding. Generally, it is believed that natural delivery is a better fit to our body. (27-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 2)
The body of a woman who receives cesarean delivery does not secrete certain hormones and consequently she gets several problems but in natural delivery the body would secrete the hormones that are necessary for women’s health. (28-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 3)
Negative behavioral beliefs
I was always worried that during vaginal delivery my baby to be harmed. So I have decided to have cesarean section. (35-old-year, higher education, employed, gravidity 1)
I think the womb will lose its original form. Thus I do not like to have normal delivery. Yes, it is good to have a normal delivery but I do like to keep my shape. (29-old-year, secondary education, employed, gravidity 1)
Other perceived disadvantages of vaginal delivery related to the labor and delivery process: embarrassment, discomfort during the vaginal exam, and the body position required. In addition, participants reported some problems that might occur during labor that would make cesarean section necessary.
Injunctive norms refer to behaviors that are perceived as being approved or disapproved of by other people. Such norms typically assist an individual in determining what is acceptable and what is unacceptable social behavior.
I only listen to my doctor’s advice. I don’t care about other people’s sayings. If he tells me that you should have cesarean delivery I will accept. (23-old-year, higher education, employed, gravidity 1)
Natural delivery has less bleeding. I have investigated about it beforehand, but unfortunately my doctor doesn’t let me to do it. (34-old-year, higher education, employed, gravidity 2)
Most doctors say we do not do natural delivery. They say we don’t have enough time. These doctors try to convince women to do cesarean because they want to get more money. I believe first we should focus on doctors rather than women if we wish to increase natural delivery. (24-old-year, primary education, housewife, gravidity 1)
If I could decide about it I certainly would choose natural delivery, as I will be fine very soon. My doctor rejects natural delivery. He says it is better not to do natural delivery. Most doctors are in favor of cesarean section. (26-old-year, primary education, housewife, gravidity 2)
My sisters say that the natural delivery is better since you can keep your baby better. You can leave the bed very soon but in cesarean section you should lay in bed for sometime as you have pain. (24-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 1)
Most of the time my mother tells me that do the natural delivery. She gave birth to four children. I saw my sister in law and also my neighbor that had cesarean section. Both of them had post-delivery problems. (22-old-year, primary education, housewife, gravidity 2)
My husband heard that natural delivery is better. He believes it is healthier and has fewer problems. He says that do the natural delivery. (24-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 1)
My sister had vaginal delivery and I am going to have vaginal delivery too. I think there would be fewer complications after vaginal delivery as many women around me say so. (28-old-year, primary education, housewife, gravidity 1)
My sister says that natural delivery is better as you can take care of your baby better. You can leave the bed very soon but in cesarean delivery you should be on bed rest for a long time as you will have pain. (26-old-year, higher education, housewife, gravidity 1)
I believe that for vaginal delivery one should be strong enough. I am incapable to do so since I am so fragile. (26-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 2)
If those who are present in labor room help pregnant women and give some clue then one would feel much better for normal delivery (30-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 5)
I came here for my first delivery. They provided us a short lecture on normal delivery and its advantages including the fact that normal delivery does need anesthesia and the mother and child will not experience any harm. You should just bear a little pain.’ (22-old-year, secondary education, housewife, gravidity 1)
Perceptions of women with and without previous childbirth experience
A summary of expressed beliefs by women with and without previous childbirth experience
With previous childbirth experience
Without previous childbirth experience
Expressed positive attitudes towards pain tolerance during vaginal delivery
Expressed worries about pain for vaginal delivery
No fear expressed
Expressed fear of fetal injury, and unexpected delivery date
Experience of a real motherhood
Like to keep body shape
Embarrassment and discomfort
Mentioned embarrassment and discomfort with vaginal delivery
Views on mode of delivery
Viewed vaginal delivery as natural and normal
Viewed vaginal delivery as suffering
Overall expressed preference for mode of delivery
This study explored pregnant women’s beliefs related to vaginal delivery and found a tendency to prefer vaginal delivery. We also found that a range of behavioral, normative and control beliefs were involved in shaping women’s decision on selecting the mode of delivery. Exploration of salient beliefs towards revealed a number of underlying factors that might influence women’s decisions and should be taken into account when designing interventions for promoting vaginal delivery. Recent evidence examined interventions designed to increase vaginal delivery, although inconsistent, suggest that educational strategies delivered by opinion leaders would significantly increase vaginal delivery [20, 21]. In Iran where the majority of women are Muslim (98 %), religious leaders could play an important role. In addition as suggested Iranian midwives could help increase vaginal delivery if they learned more about normal birth and evidence-based care, and to gain confidence in their ability to facilitate birth .
Fear of childbirth was one of the psychological factors that contributed to women’s decision in preferring cesarean section. Such observation implies that prenatal care educational programs should be implemented, and should include discussion regarding the fears of childbirth. Studies have shown that childbirth related fear was among the most common reasons for preference for cesarean section [23, 24].
Results showed that participants were concerned about the pain of vaginal delivery; some were positive and some were negative. However, we noted that the positive aspects of pain were greater than those that were negative. Women with positive attitudes believed that pain should be tolerated to gain rewards including moving from womanhood to motherhood. Studies reported that the pain during childbirth was often seen as a confirmation of passage into motherhood, natural and worth suffering [13, 25].
Women reported that health care providers encouraged them to have cesarean section. Similarly a qualitative study of 14 women in Australia indicated that women who had caesarean section in their first pregnancy in the absence of a known medical indication perceived that their preference for cesarean was safe and responsible . A systematic review of quantitative studies that evaluated non-clinical interventions for increasing the uptake of vaginal birth indicated that national guidelines influenced vaginal birth rates, but a greater effect was seen when institutions developed local guidelines, adopted a conservative approach to caesarean section, used opinion leaders, gave individualized information to women, and gave feedback to obstetricians about mode of birth rates . However, as a quasi-experimental study from Iran reported, even applying clinical practice guidelines alone could not guarantee that the cesarean section rate would decrease , perhaps a more effective way is to engage women in the process of decision-making. A qualitative study from UK found that many women did not participate actively in the decision-making since they felt uncomfortable with the responsibility. This study also found that feelings about the amount and quality of the information received regarding delivery options from health care providers varied greatly, with many women wishing for information to be tailored to their individual clinical circumstances and needs .
The present study clearly demonstrates that pregnant women mentioned a number of barriers regarding vaginal delivery including internal and external barriers. Studies have shown that pregnant women feared their own abilities related to vaginal delivery or expressed fear of losing control during delivery [30, 31]. It seems that the increase of personal confidence for vaginal delivery would decrease fears and thus vaginal delivery would decrease fear. A recent publication highlighted association between strength of preference for vaginal delivery and likelihood of vaginal birth . The findings of this study also indicated that there were a number of external barriers that influenced women’s preferences. These factors included issues related to insufficient or inappropriate care during labor and inadequate relationship with their health providers to gain accurate information in prenatal care. Studies have shown that women during childbirth need continuous support for a good birth experience [33, 34]. It was suggested that women who receive continuous support during childbirth by a midwife is likely to feel less alone and restoring the woman’s trust in herself .
Finally as it relates to the theoretical framework of the study, one might argue that if we hope to reduce unnecessary cesarean sections and positively impact women’s choice for vaginal delivery, there is need to reinforce positive behavioral beliefs among women when attending antenatal care units. We should encourage women and indicate that they have enough strength for vaginal delivery. At the same time we need to tackle internal and external barriers both within and outside families. As indicated in this study physicians and health care providers have important role in shaping women’s decision. Thus, they should also be trained through regulations and standard audits.
Strengths and limitations
A major strength of our study was the fact that we used a qualitative method to investigate salient beliefs towards vaginal delivery in pregnant women. However, our results were derived from a sample of women living in Tehran and thus, it may not be generalized to all women living in Iran. Finally it is worth noting that since this study focused on vaginal delivery, it would not add to the literature on women’s choice for elective cesarean section.
Although findings revealed that most pregnant women had positive beliefs towards vaginal delivery, it was found that pregnant women need more guidance by midwives and obstetricians. Irrespective of the positive beliefs, health care providers should address women’s psychological needs during pregnancy and give continuous support during childbirth. These strategies could improve their self-control during labor, decrease fears of childbirth and increase satisfaction with their birth.
We would like to thank all women who participated in this study. Also we would like to acknowledge the editorial help that we received from Dr. Marianne Vidler. Without her assistance it would be impossible for us to edit the manuscript.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Ahmadnia S, Delavar B, Einizinab H, Kazemipour S, Mehryar AH, Naghavi M. Caesarean section in the Islamic Republic of Iran: prevalence and some sociodemographic correlates. East Mediterr Health J. 2009;15:1389–98.Google Scholar
- Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M, Asl Amin Abad R. Prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Iran: systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2014;43:545–55.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:439–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easterling TR. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA. 2000;283:2411–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ. 2007;176:455–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007;34:65–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yazdizadeh B, Nedjat S, Mohammad K, Rashidian A, Changizi N, Majdzadeh R. Cesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:159.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pang SM, Leung DT, Leung TY, Lai CY, Lau TK, Chung TK. Determinants of preference for elective caesarean section in Hong Kong Chinese pregnant women. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13:100–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbosa GP, Giffin K, Angulo-Tuesta A, de Souza GA, Chor D, D’Orsi E, et al. Cesarean sections: who wants them and under what circumstances? Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2003;19:1611–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osis MJ, Padua KS, Duarte GA, Souza TR, Faundes A. The opinion of Brazilian women regarding vaginal labor and cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;75 Suppl 1:59–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yee LM, Kaimal AJ, Houston KA, Wu E, Thiet MP, Nakagawa S, et al. Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:377.e1-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maharlouei N, Rezaianzadeh A, Hesami E, Moradi F, Mazloomi E, Joulaei H, et al. The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18:943–50.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu NH, Mazzoni A, Zamberlin N, Colomar M, Chang OH, Arnaud L, et al. Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2013;10:2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Latifnejad Roudsari R, Zakerihamidi M, Merghati KE. Socio-cultural beliefs, values and traditions regarding women’s preferred mode of birth in the North of Iran. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2015;3:165–76.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shahoei R, Rezaei M, Ranaei F, Khosravy F, Zaheri F. Kurdish women’s preference for mode of birth: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20:302–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hajian S, Shariati M, Mirzaii Najmabadi K, Yunesian M, Ajami MI. Use of the extended parallel process model (EPPM) to predict Iranian women’s intention for vaginal delivery. J Transcult Nurs. 2015;26:234–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noar SM. A health educator’s guide to theories of health behavior. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2006;24:75–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wikipedia: Rostam. In Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Encyclopedia on-line. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rostam. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
- Nilsson C, Lundgren I, Smith V, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nicoletti J, Devane D, et al. Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic review. Midwifery. 2015;31:657–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lundgren I, Smith V, Nilsson C, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nicoletti J, Devane D, et al. Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Torkzahrani S. Childbirth education in Iran. J Perinat Educ. 2008;17:51–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gamble JA, Health M, Creedy DK. Women’s preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth. 2001;28:101–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wax J, Cartin A, Pinette M, Blackstone J. Patient choice cesarean: An evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004;59:601–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bailey S. Gender shows. First time mothers and embodied selves. Gender Society. 2001;15:110–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fenwick J, Staff L, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Bayes S. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery. 2010;26:394–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Catling-Paull C, Johnston R, Ryan C, Foureur MJ, Homer CS. Non-clinical interventions that increase the uptake and success of vaginal birth after caesarean section: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67:1662–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yavangi M, Sohrabi MR, Alishahi Tabriz A. Effect of Iranian Ministry of Health Protocols on cesarean section rate: A quasi-experimental study. J Res Health Sci. 2013;13:48–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moffat MA, Bell JS, Porter MA, Lawton S, Hundley V, Danielian P, et al. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: A qualitative study. BJOG. 2007;114:86–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salmani N. Studying the viewpoint of pregnant mothers about factors affecting in select of giving birth method in the Yazd Shohadaye Kargar hospital. J Nurs Midwifery Urmia Univ Med Sci. 2007;5:77–89.Google Scholar
- Lowe NK. Self-efficacy for labor and childbirth fears in nulliparous pregnant women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;21:219–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu E, Kaimal AJ, Houston K, Yee LM, Nakagawa S, Kuppermann M. Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:440.e1-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD003766.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lundgren I, Karlsdottir S, Bondas T. Long-term memories and experiences of childbirth in a Nordic context: a secondary analysis. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2009;4:115–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Women’s lived experience of fear of childbirth. Midwifery. 2009;25:e1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar