Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A community-based study on prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction among Kinondoni District Residents, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania

  • Pedro Pallangyo1, 2Email author,
  • Paulina Nicholaus1,
  • Peter Kisenge1,
  • Henry Mayala1,
  • Noel Swai1 and
  • Mohamed Janabi1
Reproductive Health201613:140

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0249-2

Received: 30 March 2016

Accepted: 20 October 2016

Published: 29 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Globally, erectile dysfunction burden (ED) is rising appreciably and it is projected to affect about 332 million men by the year 2025. This rise is attributable to the rising incidence of conditions associated with ED including obesity, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease and depression. We conducted this community-based screening to elucidate on the prevalence of ED and its associated factors among men residing in an urban community in Tanzania.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional community-based study and interviewed 441 men aged at least 18 years. Diabetes and hypertension were defined as per the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and the 7th Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC 7) respectively. The 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Scale was used to assess for erectile dysfunction. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the factors associated with ED.

Results

The mean age was 47.1 years, 57.6 % had excess body weight, 8.2 % had diabetes and 61.5 % had high blood pressure. Overall, 24 % (106/441) of men in this study had some form of ED. Participants with age ≥55, positive smoking history, obesity, diabetes and hypertension displayed highest rates of ED in their respective subgroups. However, age ≥40 and diabetes were ultimately the strongest factors for ED after multivariate logistic regression analyses, (OR 5.0, 95 % CI 2.2–11.2, p < 0.001 and OR 5.3, 95 % CI 2.2–12.7, p < 0.001 respectively).

Conclusion

Erectile dysfunction affects about a quarter of adult men living in Kinondoni district. Old age, obesity, smoking, hypertension and diabetes have the potential to increase the odds of ED up-to 5 times. In view of this, men with diabetes and hypertension should be offered screening services and treatment of ED as an integral component in their management.

Keywords

Erectile dysfunction Diabetes Hypertension Excess body weight Community-based

Plain English summary

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as persistent inability to attain and/or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual activity. ED is associated with old age and comorbidities including diabetes and hypertension amongst others. The incidence of ED is increasing globally and this is attributed to the aging population and the increase in the incidence of diabetes and hypertension. We aimed to determine the burden of ED among male residents of Kinondoni district, Dar es Salaam Tanzania. We recruited and interviewed 441 men aged at least 18 years. We utilized the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Scale for erectile dysfunction assessment. We defined diabetes and hypertension according to the International Diabetes Federation and the 7th Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC 7) respectively. About a quarter of all men had some form of ED. Old age and diabetes were associated with a 5 times increased likelihood for having ED. We concluded that ED is a common problem among men of reproductive age and that men particularly those with diabetes and hypertension should be offered screening services and treatment of ED as an integral component in their management.

Background

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as persistent inability to attain and/or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual activity [1]. Despite its benign nature, ED has the potential to impair personal interactions, quality of life and well-being of both patients and their partners [24]. The rates of ED increase with age almost always indicating endothelial dysfunction [514]. Furthermore, ED is associated with a number of medical conditions or their treatment including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease and depression [1522].

Establishing the burden of ED in the community is challenging and most clinicians lack adequate skills in detecting and/or managing it [23, 24]. The reported rates worldwide have a wide variability ranging between 2 % and 90 % depending on the age, race, comorbidities, hospital- versus community-based, assessment tool, and geographical location of the population studied [68, 12, 2538]. With the rising of comorbidities associated with ED worldwide, it is projected that its incidence will rise appreciably and that by year 2025, 332 million men will have some form of ED [39]. Similar to other developing nations, Tanzania is also witnessing an upsurge of non-communicable diseases with ED as an inevitable complication. Little is known about the community burden of ED in Tanzania. To elucidate on the prevalence of ED and its associated factors in a Tanzanian community we undertook this cross-sectional study among Kinondoni district men.

Methods

Study procedures & definition of terms

We conducted this 4-days community-based cross-sectional screening among men residing in Kinondoni district, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania in January 2016. Four hundred forty-one men of African descent aged at least 18 years were recruited and screened for erectile dysfunction. Participants were consented to participate in the study after they voluntarily came to the screening grounds for an organized general health check-up. Interviewers, mainly clinicians and nurses from the Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute (JKCI) and Mwananyamala District Hospital were recruited and trained to administer the questionnaire and perform anthropometric, blood pressure (BP) and random/fasting blood glucose (RBG/FBG) measurements. Weight and height were measured with standard scales and BMI was calculated by a ratio of weight (in kilograms) to height (in meters) squared. WHO BMI cut-off values were used to define underweight, normal, overweight and obese [40]. Smoking history was sought and participants were categorized as current, past or a never smoker. Diabetes was diagnosed using RBG ≥11.1 mmol/L and/or FBG ≥7 mmol/L [41]. Prediabetes was defined as FBG of 5.6–6.9 mmol/L and/or RBG of 7.8–11.0 mmol/L [41]. Blood pressure was measured by digital BP machines where a systolic blood pressure (SBP) <120 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg defined normotension. Pre-hypertension was defined by SBP of 120–139 mmHg or DBP of 80–89 mmHg, while SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg indicated hypertension [42]. The validated Swahili-translated 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Scale was used to assess for erectile dysfunction [4346]. The IIEF-5 Scale categorizes ED into five categories depending on the score i.e. 22–25: no ED, 17–21: mild ED, 12–16: mild to moderate ED, 8–11: moderate ED, 5–7: severe ED.

Sample size calculations and recruitment process

This study was conducted in Kinondoni district which has an adult (≥18 years) population of about 1.633 million, 48.5 % of whom are males. Overall, we aimed to screen (for hypertension and diabetes) a number representing at least 0.1 % of the district’s total population i.e. ≥1633 persons. As this was the first local community-based study intending to investigate on the burden of ED, the authors hypothesized the prevalence to be 50 % and so it was predetermined that a minimum of 396 men (i.e. 50 % of the estimated 792/1633 men to be interviewed) will be assessed for ED. However, we exceeded the target and screened 1826 persons of whom 882 (48.3 %) were males. Our new minimum target for ED screening was then raised to 441 (i.e. 50 % of the recruited 882/1826 men), which is the exact number that comprised this study.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are summarized and presented as means (± SD) while categorical variables are displayed as frequencies (percentages). Chi square tests and Student’s T-test were used in comparison of categorical and continuous variables respectively. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with ED. Significant factors on bivariate analysis were included in a logistic regression model to control for confounders. Odd ratios with 95 % confidence intervals and p-values are reported. STATA v.11.0 was used for analysis, significance was set at p < 0.05 and all analyses were two-sided.

Results

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of 441 study participants is displayed in Table 1. The mean age was 47.1 (±15.4) years and 63.7 % were aged 40 years and above. 53.8 % had completed primary school, 71 % were married, and 14 % ever smoked. The mean BMI was 26.6 (±5.3) kg/m2 and 57.6 % of individuals had excess body weight (i.e. BMI ≥25). The mean blood glucose level was 6.1 (±2.2) mmol/L and 8.2 % had type-2 diabetes mellitus. The mean SBP and DBP were 146 (±32) mmHg and 91 (±20) mmHg respectively and 61.5 % had hypertension.
Table 1

Socio-Demographic & Clinical Characteristics of Study Participants (N = 441)

Characteristic

n (%)

Age groups

 18–39

160 (36.3 %)

 40–54

135 (30.6 %)

  ≥ 55

146 (33.1 %)

Education level

 None

12 (02.7 %)

 Primary

237 (53.8 %)

 Secondary

139 (31.5 %)

 University

53 (12.0 %)

Marital status

 Single

95 (21.6 %)

 Married

313 (71.0 %)

 Divorced

24 (05.4 %)

 Widowed

9 (02.0 %)

Smoking status

 Non-smoker

379 (86.0 %)

 Current smoker

9 (02.0 %)

 Past smoker

53 (12.0 %)

BMI status

 Underweight

14 (03.2 %)

 Normal

173 (39.2 %)

 Overweight

154 (35.0 %)

 Obese

100 (22.6 %)

Blood Sugar Range

 Normal

344 (77.9 %)

 Prediabetes

61 (13.9 %)

 Diabetes

36 (08.2 %)

Blood Pressure Range

 Normal

60 (13.6 %)

 Prehypertension

110 (24.9 %)

 Hypertension

271 (61.5 %)

Overall, 24 % (106/441) of men in this study had some form of ED. Of these, 9(8.5 %) had the mild form, 24 (22.6 %) mild-moderate form, 40 (37.8 %) moderate form, and 33 (31.1 %) had the severe form. Prevalence of ED increased with increase in age and weight i.e. 37 % and 32 % of those aged ≥55 and obese respectively had ED compared to 10.6 % and 18.1 % among those aged 18–39 years and normal BMI, (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 respectively), Fig. 1. Men with a positive smoking history had a 40 % increased likelihood for ED compared to never smokers, (OR 1.4, 95%CI 0.7–2.5, p > 0.05). 63 % of men with diabetes had ED compared to 30.4 % with prediabetes and 19.1 % with normal blood glucose, (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively). Participants with prehypertension (20.2 %) and hypertension (29.3 %) had significantly higher ED rates compared to normotensive persons (8.3 %), p < 0.05 and p < 0.001 respectively.
Fig. 1

Prevalence of ED by Age, BMI, Diabetes and Hypertension status

Six variables including age, BMI, physical activity, smoking, hypertension, and diabetes status underwent bivariate analyses to assess if they have associations with ED. Four variables including age, BMI, hypertension and diabetes status revealed significant associations and these were added in a logistic regression model for further analysis. Table 2 displays results of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Men aged 40 years and above displayed a 5 times increased likelihood of having ED compared to those younger than 40 years, (OR 5.0, 95 % CI 2.2–11.2, p < 0.001). Likewise, diabetes was associated with a 5 times increased odds of having ED, (OR 5.3, 95 % CI 2.2–12.7, p < 0.001).
Table 2

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with ED

Test group

Comparative group

OR

95 % CI

P-value

Age ≥40

Age < 40

5.0

2.2–11.2

<0.001

BMI ≥30

BMI <30

1.4

0.7–2.5

0.306

Hypertensive

Non-hypertensive

1.2

0.6–2.3

0.541

Diabetic

Non-diabetic

5.3

2.2–12.7

<0.001

Discussion

Nearly a quarter of men in this present study had ED with over two-thirds exhibiting the moderate to severe form. Our findings are close to a Chinese study by Bai et al. which produced a prevalence of 28.3 % [47]. A wide variability in the prevalence of ED from 13.2 % [48] in Egypt to 51.3 [25] in Singapore observed among studies [12, 25, 40, 49] is largely a result of variabilities in population characteristics and tools used for ED assessment among studies. Old age has been consistently shown to be a strong predictor of ED [25]. In this study, the rate of ED among participants aged 55 and above was three times compared to those in the age group 18–39 years. These findings echo the results of a landmark Massachusetts Male Aging Study [25] among others [2, 18, 29]. Aging is associated with comorbidities resulting into atherosclerosis and ultimately vascular dysfunction with ED as one of the manifestations [50].

Obesity was significantly associated with ED on bivariate analyses in this study. Such findings are in unison with Moreira [12] et al. study in which obesity proved to be a significant predictor on bivariate analysis but lost its significance after multivariate analysis. A study by Chung et al [51] showed that obesity is not an underlying factor for ED per se, but it does increase the risk through development of chronic vascular disease. Numerous studies [12, 50, 5255] have suggested a dose dependent relationship between smoking and ED. Ever smokers in this study had a 40 % increased likelihood for ED compared to never smokers. A systematic review by Cao [55] et al. found that ED was increased by 20 % and 51 % among past- and current-smokers respectively. Apart from its potential to cause direct toxic effects on the vascular endothelium, smoking is linked to ED through its potential to mediate systemic changes including hypercoagulability, platelet aggregation and thromboxane-prostacyclin imbalance [56].

Diabetes is a well-established factor for ED. Participants with diabetes in our study had a 5 times increased odds for ED (OR 5.3) compared to diabetes-free persons. These current results have replicated the findings of a study by Zedan [57] et al. among Egyptian men which found an odds of 5.4. Other studies have consistently produced higher ED rates among diabetics compared to diabetes-free persons ranging between 35 % and 75 % [8, 11, 12, 25, 39, 5863]. Diabetes is a risk factor for ED through its potential for causing autonomic neuropathy, gonadal dysfunction, and vascular and neurogenic impairment of penile smooth muscle [59, 64, 65]. Hypertensive participants had a tripled likelihood of having ED compared to their normotensive counterparts (p < 0.001), however the significance was lost after multivariate logistic analyses. Hypertension and some antihypertensive drugs have been shown to increase the risk for ED [17, 29]. High blood pressure is known to interfere with blood flow to the corpora cavernosa by causing narrowing and loss of elasticity of arteries thus resulting to ED [66].

Other factors including heavy alcohol consumption [2, 52], depression [18, 6769], and low economic status [18, 70, 71] have been associated with increased risk for ED but were beyond the scope of this study. Further studies on ED in this area could investigate on their association with ED among Tanzanian men.

This study has several strengths including; (i) the use of an internationally recognized tool for assessing ED that will make comparison with other studies feasible, (ii) the simultaneous assessment of obesity, diabetes and hypertension allowed us to confirm the presence of these risk factors rather than relying on participants’ self-report. This study has some limitations as well, including; (i) the generalizability of our findings may be limited because the men screened in this study voluntarily came for screening and this might reflect a selected population of those either with a very good health seeking behavior or those having some health concerns necessitating medical help, (ii) Our assessment of ED was through interviews and we are aware that conditions like ED are highly associated with social stigmas. As a result of this, it is likely that ED was underreported by study participants, (iii) we made diagnoses of hypertension and diabetes based on a single point measurement of BP and RBG/FBG, thus our diabetes and hypertension rates might be overestimated, and (iv) our study was prone to several forms of bias including selection bias and non-differential bias, inevitably due to its cross-sectional nature.

Conclusions

Several conclusions can be drawn from this present study: (i) ED affects one in four men over 18 years in Kinondoni district, (ii) age and diabetes mellitus are the strongest factors associated with ED, (iii) the high rates of ED among hypertensive and diabetic patients suggest that patients with such comorbidities should be screened for ED, (iv) with the increasing incidence of obesity, hypertension, diabetes and an aging population, ED may become a significant public health problem. In view of these findings: (i) services for diagnosis and treatment of ED should be incorporated in diabetes and hypertension clinics particularly in the developing world, and (ii) health programs should be designed in developing nations to educate and empower individuals on healthy eating, physical activeness and health seeking behavior.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to clinicians and nurses of the Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute and Mwananyamala hospital for their dedication towards this study. The authors are indebted to Hon. Regional Commissioner Paul Makonda for the technical and financial support.

Funding

This study was funded by the Office of the District Commissioner for Kinondoni Municipal. The funder played no role in the design, analysis and manuscript development of this research. The authors assume the responsibility for this work.

Availability of data and materials

The final version of data set supporting the findings of this paper may be found in the Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute website (http://www.jkci.or.tz). The corresponding author will be more than willing to email the data set to the editorial committee whenever it’s needed.

Authors’ contributions

MJ, PK, and PP made contributions in study designing. PP and PN performed all data management and manuscript writing. The initial draft was revised by PK, HM, NS and MJ. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript version.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Unit of Research of the Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute (JKCI). Permission to conduct the study was granted by the Office of the Kinondoni District Commissioner. All participating men gave informed consent.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Adult Cardiovascular Medicine, Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute
(2)
Unit of Research, Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute

References

  1. Consensus NIH. Development Panel on Impotence. NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. JAMA. 1993;270:83–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Moreira ED, Bestane WJ, Bartolo EB, Fittipaldi JAS. Prevalence and determinants of erectile dysfunction in Santos, southeastern Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J. 2002;120:49–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Krane RJ, Goldstein I. Saenz de Tejada I. Impotence. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1648–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. MacDonagh R, Ewings P, Porter T. The effect of erectile dysfunction on quality of life: psychometric testing of a new quality of life measure for patients with erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2002;167(1):212–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Muneer A, Kalsi J, Nazareth I, Arya M. Erectile Dysfunction. BMJ. 2014;348:g129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kongkanand A. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Thailand. Thai Erectile Dysfunction Epidemiological Study Group. Int J Androl. 2000;23 suppl 2:77–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun M, Wassmer G, Klotz T, et al. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the “Cologne Male Survey.”. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:305–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Martin-Morales A, Sanchez-Cruz JJ, Saenz TI, et al. Prevalence and independent risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Spain: results of the Epidemiologia de la Disfuncion Erectil Masculina Study. J Urol. 2001;166:569–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein R, Klein BE, Lee KE, et al. Prevalence of self-reported erectile dysfunction in people with long-term IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:135–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fedele D, Coscelli C, Santeusanio F, et al. Erectile dysfunction in diabetic subjects in Italy. Gruppo Italiano Studio Deficit Erettile nei Diabetici. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1973–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fedele D, Bortolotti A, Coscelli C, et al. Erectile dysfunction in type 1 and type 2 diabetics in Italy. On behalf of Gruppo Italiano Studio Deficit Erettile nei Diabetici. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:524–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Moreira ED, Abdo CH, Torres EB, et al. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction: results of the Brazilian study of sexual behavior. Urology. 2001;58:583–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chew KK, Earle CM, Stuckey BG, et al. Erectile dysfunction in general medicine practice: prevalence and clinical correlates. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:41–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Benet AE, Melman A. The epidemiology of erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 1995;22:699–709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kolodny RC, Kahn CB, Goldstein HH, Bornett DM. Sexual dysfunction in diabetic men. Diabetes. 1974;13(4):306–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis RW, Fugl-Meyer KS, Bosch R, et al. Epidemiology/risk factors of sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2004;1(1):36–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sáenz de Tejada I, Angulo J, Cellek S, et al. Pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2005;2(1):26–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lockhat Y, Ross A, Ramlachan P, Rangiah C. The prevalence of erectile dysfunction at a primary healthcare clinic in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, S Afr Fam Pract. 2013;55(3):289–93. doi:10.1080/20786204.2013.10874352.
  19. Hirshkowitz M, Karacan I, Gurakar A, et al. Hypertension, erectile dysfunction, and occult sleep apnea. Sleep. 1989;12:223–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Metro MJ, Broderick GA. Diabetes and vascular impotence: does insulin dependence increase the relative severity? Int J Impot Res. 1999;11:87–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wei M, Macera CA, Davis DR, et al. Total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein cholesterol as important predictors of erectile dysfunction. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:930–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mckinlay JB, Longcope C, Gary A. The questionable physiologic and epidemiologic bases for a male climacteric syndrome: preliminary results from Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Maturitas. 1989;11:103–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bortolotti A, Parazzini F, Colli E, Landoni M. The epidemiology of erectile dysfunction and its risk factors. Int J Androl. 1997;20:323–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirby R, Holmes S, Carson C. Erectile dysfunction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Health Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  25. Tan JK, Hong CY, Png DJC, Liew LCH, Wong ML. Erectile Dysfunction in Singapore: Prevalence and Its Associated Factors – A Population-Based Study. Singapore Med J. 2003;44(1):020–6.Google Scholar
  26. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 1994;151:54–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kedde H, Donker G, Leusink P, Kruijer H. The incidence of sexual dysfunction in patients attending Dutch general practitioners. Int J Sex Health. 2011;23(4):269–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Adebusoye LA, Olapade-olaopa OE, Ladipo MM, Owoaje ET. Prevalence and Correlates of Erectile Dysfunction among Primary Care Clinic Attendees in Nigeria. Global J Health Sci. 2012;4(4):107–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. El-Sakka AI, Tayeb KA. Erectile dysfunction risk factors in non-insulin dependent diabetic Saudi patients. J Urol. 2003;169:1043–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinnock CB, Marshall VR. Erectile dysfunction in the community: a prevalence study. Med J Aust. 1999;171(7):353–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Prins J, Blanker MH, Bohnen AM, Thomas S, Bosch JLHR. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of population-based studies. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:422–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Al-Hunayan A, Al-Mutar M, Kehinde EO, Thalib L, Al-Ghorory M. The prevalence and predictors of erectile dysfunction in men with newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BJU Int. 2007;99:130–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Khatib FA, Jarrah NS, Shegem NS, Bateiha AM, Abu-Ali RM, Ajlouni KM. Sexual dysfunction among Jordanian men with diabetes. Saudi Med J. 2006;27:351–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Koskimaki J, Hakama M, Huhtala H, Tammela TL. Effect of erectile dysfunction on frequency of intercourse: a population based prevalence study in Finland. J Urol. 2000;164:367–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dunn KM, Croft PR, Hackett GI. Sexual problems: a study of the prevalence and need for health care in the general population. Fam Pract. 1998;15:519–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ventegodt S. Sex and the quality of life in Denmark. Arch Sex Behav. 1998;27:295–307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mutagaywa RK, Lutale J, Aboud M, Kamala BA. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and associated factors among diabetic men attending diabetic clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17:227.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Selvin E, Burnett AL, Platz EA. Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in the US. Am J Med. 2007;120(2):151–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ayta IA, McKinlay JB, Krane RJ. The likely worldwide increase in erectile dysfunction between 1995 and 2025 and some possible policy consequences. BJU Int. 1999;84(1):50–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series 854. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995.Google Scholar
  41. American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Sec. 2. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38 Suppl 1:S8–S16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52. Originally published online December 1, 2003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology. 1999;54:346–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49(7):822–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC. The sexual health inventory for men (IIEF-5). Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:342–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, et al. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11:319–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Bai Q, Xu Q, Jiang H, Zhang W, Wang X, Zhu J. Prevalence and risk factors of erectile dysfunction in three cities of China: a community-based study. Asian J Androl. 2004;6:343–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Seyam RM, Albakry A, Ghobish A, Arif H, Dandash K, Rashwan H. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and its correlates in Egypt: a community-based study. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:237–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Derby CA, et al. Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Urol. 2000;163(2):460–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Corona G, Mannucci E, Mansani R, et al. Aging and pathogenesis of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2004;16(5):395–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mannino DM, Klevens RM, Flanders WD. Cigarette smoking: An independent risk factor for impotence? Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:1003–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Derby CA, Mohr BA, Goldstein I, Feldman HA, Johannes CB, McKinlay JB. Modifiable risk factors and erectile dysfunction: Can lifestyle changes modify risk? Urology. 2000;56:302–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosen RC. Brief male sexual function inventory for urology. Urology. 1996;47(5):782–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. McVary KT, Carrier S, Wessells H. Subcommittee on Smoking and Erectile Dysfunction Socioeconomic Committee, Sexual Medicine Society of North America. Smoking and erectile dysfunction: evidence based analysis. J Urol. 2001;166:1624–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Cao S, Yin X, Wang Y, Zhou H, Song F, Lu Z. Smoking and Risk of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60443.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Bornman MS, du Plessis DJ. Smoking and vascular impotence: A reason for concern. S Afr Med J. 1986;70:329–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zedan H, Hareadei AA, Abd-Elsayed AA, Abdel-Maguid EM. Cigarette smoking, hypertension and diabetes mellitus as risk factors for erectile dysfunction in upper Egypt. East Med Health J. 2010;16:281–5.Google Scholar
  58. Kayigil O, Atahan O, Metin A. Multifactorial evaluation of diabetic erectile dysfunction. Int Urol Nephrol. 1996;28:717–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Cummings MH, Alexander WD. Erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes. Hosp Med dysfunction. 1999;60:638–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. McCulloch DK, Campbell IW, Wu F, et al. The prevalence of diabetic impotence. Diabetologia. 1980;18:279–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Kaiser FE, Korenman SG. Impotence in diabetic men. Am J Med. 1988;85:147–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. De Berardis G, Franciosi M, et al. Quality of Care and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes (QuED) Study Group. Erectile dysfunction and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: a serious problem too often overlooked. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(2):284–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Siu SC, Lo SK, Wong KW, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Hong Kong diabetic patients. Diabetes Med. 2001;18:732–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Jevtich MJ, Edson M, Jarman WD, Herrera HH. Vascular factor in erectile failure among diabetics. Urology. 1982;19:163–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Saenz de Tejada I, Goldstein I, Azadzoi K, Krane RJ, Cohen RA. Impaired neurogenic and endothelium-mediated relaxation of penile smooth muscle from diabetic men with impotence. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:1025–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sáenz de Tejada I, Goldstein I. Diabetic penile neuropathy. Urol Clin North Am. 1988;15(1):17–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Seftel AD. Erectile dysfunction in the elderly; epidemiology, aetiology and approaches to treatment. J Urol. 2003;169(6):1999–2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Kubin M, Wagner G, Fugl-Meyer AR. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15(1):63–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Berrada S, Kadri N, Mechakra-Tahari S, Nejjari C. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and its correlates: a population based study in Morocco. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15 Suppl 1:S3–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Ahn TY, Park JK, Lee SW, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Korean men: results of an epidemiological study. Int J Sex Med. 2007;4(5):1269–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Aytaç IA, Araujo AB, Johannes CB, Kleinman KP, McKinlay JB. Socioeconomic factors and incidence of erectile dysfunction: findings of the longitudinal Massachussetts Male Aging Study. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(5):771–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement