Skip to main content

Decision-making on terminating pregnancy for Muslim Arab women pregnant with fetuses with congenital anomalies: maternal affect and doctor-patient communication



This study focused on decision-making on terminating pregnancy for Arab Muslim women in Israel who were pregnant with fetuses diagnosed with congenital anomalies. It examined the impact of the doctor-patient interaction on the women’s decision, especially in light of social and religious pressures not to terminate under any circumstances. Our goal was to identify perceptions and attitudes of Muslim Arab women who choose to continue their pregnancy following the detection of congenital anomalies in prenatal tests. Specific objectives included (1) To examine the Muslim Arab women’s perceptions on genetic testing, and ascertain the reasons for their decision to continue the pregnancy following the detection of a congenital anomaly in the fetus; and (2) To examine risk communication of gynecologists regarding genetic testing and abortions, and regarding the decision of continuing or terminating a pregnancy following detection of a congenital anomaly.


The research framework used the constructivist classical qualitative method to understand the experience of women at high risk for congenital anomalies and their experience of how doctors communicate the risk.


It showed that the emotional element is no less dominant than religious and social elements. The findings emphasized the disparities between doctors and women regarding emotional involvement (non-directive counselling). The women interviewees (N = 24) felt that this expressed insensitivity. As far as we know, the emotional component has not been raised in previous studies of Muslim women at high risk for congenital defects in their fetus, and therefore comprises a significant contribution of the present study.


To mitigate gaps, doctors should take affect into consideration in their communication with patients. It is important for doctors to understand the emotional element in risk communication, both in how they respect women’s emotions and in creating an emotional interaction between themselves and the women.

Peer Review reports

Plain English summary

This study focused on decision-making for Arab Muslim women in Israel who were pregnant with fetuses diagnosed with congenital anomalies. It examined the impact of the doctor-patient interaction on the women’s decision to continue the pregnancy, especially in light of social and religious pressures not to terminate the pregnancy under any circumstances.

It showed that the emotional element is no less dominant than religious and social elements. The women mentioned that they felt the fetus’s movements and that giving it up would be giving up motherhood. The present study also found that fatalism is also a factor in choosing to continue the pregnancy. The findings emphasized the disparities between doctors and women regarding emotional involvement (non-directive counselling). The women interviewees felt that this expressed insensitivity. This has not been raised in previous studies of Muslim women at high risk of giving birth to a fetus with a defect, and that is a significant contribution of the present study.

We recommend that doctors consider the emotional element in risk communication, or to arrange for a social worker to accompany them in their meetings with patients to offer emotional support to female patients who face a difficult decision.


Congenital anomalies in the fetus

The detection of congenital anomalies in fetuses is an important component of prenatal health services and usually entails a decision to continue or terminate the pregnancy [1]. Deciding whether to terminate a pregnancy after the detection of a congenital anomaly is dependent on multiple factors: maternal age, reproductive history, religious and cultural beliefs, stances on terminating pregnancy, ultrasound imagery of the anomaly, certainty of the diagnosis, stage of pregnancy, severity of the defect, number of organs affected, and specific organ systems affected [2]. The literature indicates that traditional populations are more inclined than modern populations to decline genetic testing [3] and pregnancy termination [4]. Congenital anomalies are also known as birth defects, congenital disorders or congenital malformations. Congenital anomalies can be defined as structural or functional anomalies (for example, metabolic disorders) that occur during intrauterine life and can be identified prenatally, at birth, or sometimes may only be detected later in infancy, such as hearing defects. In simple terms, congenital refers to their existence at or before birth [5].

This study examined a subpopulation of Muslim Arab women in Israel with high risk pregnancies whose fetuses were diagnosed with congenital anomaliesand who decided against terminating pregnancy. Despite the high risk for congenital anomalies in this subpopulation relative to other subgroups in Israel [6], we know of no studies of this population and how they contend with the option of terminating pregnancy [7]. Moreover, the studies that have been conducted involving Muslims in Israel and Muslims in other countries tend to examine parents who already had children with congenital anomalies, or the attitudes of parents of healthy children towards genetic testing and abortion [8]. Previous studies about opting in favor of continuing the pregnancy after the detection of congenital anomalies have been conducted in Israel among Bedouin Arabs. Although Muslim, the Bedouin are not representative of the Israeli Muslim population for several reasons, including that most do not have community clinics for the provision of either preventive or curative health services, and must travel to clinics in the towns or cities for their health care [911]. Notably, many Bedouin women go to a prenatal exam only in the second trimester [12].

Muslim clergymen in Israel were not found to oppose termination during the first 120 days of pregnancy if a congenital anomaly was detected [13, 14]. Studies of Arab Muslims worldwide have found that religious reasons often prevent women both from undergoing prenatal genetic testing [15, 16] and choosing pregnancy termination [1719].

Studies of Muslim populations in Western countries have found a wide range of positions on terminating pregnancy [20]. Some demonstrate the power of cultural and religious considerations in Muslim women’s decisions on this issue [3, 14, 21]. Other factors in the decision to continue the pregnancy are related mostly to socioeconomic status, traditional beliefs, education level, disease severity, and the burden it imposes on immediate family [2225].

In Israel, abortion has been legal since 1977, and is covered by the national insurance under the following conditions: the woman is under age 17 or over age 40; the woman is unmarried; the pregnancy is the product of a rape or incest; the pregnancy threatens the mother’s physical or emotional health; or if the fetus was found to have congenital anomalies [26].

Among Arabs in Israel, about 16% of babies born to couples who are first cousins suffer from some kind of genetic anomaly, while if the parents are related more distantly, the rate is 15.2%. In contrast, when the parents are not related, then the rate of genetic anomaly among Arabs in Israel is 8.3% of births, and some villages have a rate as low as 5.8% of births to parents who are not related [8]. Studies that examine attitudes of Arab women in Israel showed that 35% said they would not consider terminating a pregnancy even in the event of a fetus with a genetic anomaly. Another 35% would consider terminating a pregnancy only during the first 120 days of the pregnancy. Only 22% reported that they would do so in the event of a congenital anomaly. There was no significant statistical difference in answers of those from different socio-economic, demographic or religious backgrounds. However, about 70% of the respondants said they had a relative who was born with a congenital anomaly. About 50% of the respondants who said they would not consider pregnancy termination cited religious reasons for this, while 48% cited their husband’s stance as the determining factor [27]. It is possible that the women’s personal interaction with family members who have congenital anomaliesaffects their willingness to raise children born with such anomalies, along with the high prevalence of marriage between first cousins among Israeli Arabs, which stands at about 44% [28].

Maternal emotion

One reason that women decide to continue pregnancies at high risk for anomalies is the mother’s attachment to her fetus. In what Winnicott [29] calls “primary maternal preoccupation”, he indicates that the connection between pregnant women and their fetuses is established during the pregnancy. Raphael-Leff [30] has shown that pregnant women fantasize about their fetuses. Cohen, Slade [31] show that many women tend to project their fears, hopes, dreams and memories onto the fetus. Cranley [32] coined the term “maternal-fetal attachment” to describe the burgeoning relationship between the pregnant woman and her fetus, including behaviors and thoughts that reflect the establishment of an emotional connection.

The theory of “maternal role attainment” suggests four stages of women’s decision-making processes: anticipatory, formal, informal, and personal identity [33]. Lalor et al. [34] examined the choices of women with high risk pregnancies to undergo the maternal serum screening (MSS) test. The study claimed that pregnant women begin to bond with the fetus in early stages of pregnancy. In contrast, there are studies that revealed the difficulty of pregnant women to develop feelings towards the fetus upon diagnosis of fetal anomalies. Skotko [35] studied women who decided to continue their pregnancies despite diagnosis of Down Syndrome, and found that the woman’s “maternal ethnicity” led them not to terminate the pregnancy.

Affect in risk communication

There are different approaches towards communication and counseling provided by doctors. The nondirectiveness approach is taken to imply, almost implicitly, moral neutrality on the part of the counsellor, with only the client’s values having any part in decision making. This must be set against research that reports mismatches between the judgments of health professionals and patients in relation to factors such as the patient’s need for information and her or his emotional state [36, 37]. Harper & Clarke [38] argues that nondirectiveness creates an “emotional distance” from clients, thus protecting the professional from over-involvement and ensures that professionals will not be held legally accountable for decisions made by clients.

In contrast with this approach, there is an approach that relates to emotion, empathy and affect. The importance of affect on decision making is recognized increasingly in the literature [3941]. Several authors argue that people can evaluate risks and risk information using affective and cognitive appraisals [42]. Slovic et al. [43] opine that patients and doctors must often make decisions in environments with high levels of affect (at least for the patient) and high levels of vulnerability. Therefore, the doctor-patient dialog and its outcomes are informed by affect, alongside cognitive considerations [44].

Emotions and medical care

The various stages of medical care involve communication between doctors and patients. Care communication involves communicating the risk of a congenital anomaly to the patient, and is part of risk communication. This communication is significant for the quality of care and can improve the ability to diagnose a medical problem, and also improve patient compliance [45].

Patient-centered communication is widely valued as a conceptual marker of quality care, supported by a growing literature that links communication to a host of valued outcomes [46]. Empathy is seen as an essential element of the doctor-patient relationship. Research suggests a relation between physician empathy and increased patient satisfaction, as well as reduced time and expense [47].

Paling [48] believes that “most patients’ assessment of risks is primarily determined not by facts but by emotions… the most powerful precursor for effective risk communication is for the doctor to strive to display both competence and a caring approach”. Another important element of communication is the doctor’s consideration of the patient’s cultural frame of reference [49].

The scientific literature that explores why Muslim women choose to continue pregnancies following the detection of a congenital anomaly tends to focus on religious, cultural and social aspects, neglecting maternal affect. The purpose of this study was to examine the attitudes of women with high-risk pregnancies in Israel regarding pregnancy termination. We also examined the impact of doctor-patient interaction on the women’s decision.


Our goal was to identify perceptions and attitudes of Muslim Arab women who choose to continue their pregnancy following the detection of congenital anomalies in genetic and other prenatal tests. Specific objectives included (1) To examine the Muslim Arab women’s perceptions on genetic testing, and ascertain the reasons for their decision to continue the pregnancy following the detection of a congenital anomaly in the fetus; and (2) To examine the risk communication of gynecologists regarding genetic testing and pregnancy termination, and regarding the decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy following detection of a congenital anomaly.


Study design

The present research framework used the constructivist classical qualitative method research method in order to understand the experience of Muslim women at high risk for congenital anomaliesand their experience of how doctors communicate the risk [50]. The study’s theoretical model referred to affect-inducing risk communication [43].

Study participants

The study included 29 participants: 24 patients and 5 doctors (OB/GYN). All of the women were Muslim women from northern Israel pregnant with fetuses diagnosed with congenital anomalies. All of the doctors were Arab and the communication took place in Arabic. The purpose was to examine the impact of the perceptions of family and environment. The research population included 5 doctors (OB/GYN) (Table 1) to examine risk communication between them and pregnant women (Table 2). As Table 2 shows, the patients come from a range of provenances in northern Israel – from Nazareth (city) and from nearby villages. Their socio-economic status was middle-high and therefore were able to pay for genetic testing.

Table 1 Doctors’ (OB/GYN) age, clinic and interview locations
Table 2 Arab Muslim women pregnant with fetuses diagnosed with congenital abnormalities (age, marital status, number of pregnancy, geographic location of interview, socio-economic status)

Recruitment and sampling

The research took place during the years 2014–2015. The research sampling consisted of a homogeneous sample of pregnant women with positive genetic diagnosis of congenital anomalies [51]. The emphasis in a study of this kind is to select the informative group that best represents the population from which it was chosen and that can teach us about the issue under study [50]. Five interviewees were recruited by gynecologists, two by a social worker. The rest were recruited through other interviewees (snowball sampling). Most of them initiated contact with the researcher, neutralizing the risk that women would agree to be interviewed only out of a sense of obligation towards the doctor/clinic.

The doctors (OB/GYN) who participated were recruited by intensity sampling of doctors (OB/GYN), high-risk pregnancy hospital departments, and from lists of gynecologists we found on websites on gynecology, obstetrics and fertility.

Research tools

In this study three protocols were created for the target subpopulations: the first for gynecologists, the second for women pregnant for the first time whose fetuses were diagnosed with congenital anomalies, and the third for women in their second (or later) pregnancies, but for whom it was the first time that their fetuses were diagnosed with congenital anomalies.

Interview protocols for the women included questions about life perceptions, attitudes towards genetic testing and terminating pregnancy, beliefs and norms, influence of emotions on their decision, their interaction with the attending physician who communicated the anomaly, and ascertainment of their preferred channels of communication. The protocol for women in their second pregnancies included additional questions about views on the integration of a disabled child into the family.

The protocol for the interviews with the gynecologists included questions about their communication with women pregnant with fetuses with genetic defects, their attitudes towards genetic testing and abortion, and the gynecologists’ communication channels for conveying the desirable message.

The research process

After receiving the approval of the ethics committee at Haifa University, we approached gynecologists in Nazareth and in high-risk pregnancy wards in northern Israel. The interviewees we invited agreed to partcipate and all signed informed consent forms to confirm participation. The protocols were translated into Arabic, the language of the research population, and then back from Arabic into Hebrew to check accuracy.

The proportion of interviewees (24) was one quarter of the in-patients in the high risk pregnancy wards within the two hospitals during the 6-months period in which the study was conducted. The interviewer stopped interviewing additional women once we arrived at data saturation of the themes delineated [52]. All the women who participated were sent an explanation and a consent form and invited to a face-to-face interview to explore their experiences of high-risk pregnancy.

The purpose of the study and its importance were explained, and after receiving their agreement in principle to participate, we scheduled 50–60 min interviews (at time and place of their choice).

The questions were open-ended and probes were used to elicit more information. Recordings of the interviews were transcribed verbatim and de-identified. The Arabic-language interviews were transcribed by a researcher fluent in Arabic and Hebrew. All interviews were conducted by a researcher who had postgraduate training in qualitative research. Another reliable control was that the transcripts were translated into Hebrew, so that two researchers ascertained the findings. The research participants represent different subpopulations (women with high-risk first pregnancies, women with high-risk pregnancies with children, gynecologists), which strengthens the credibility and validity of the findings.

Data analysis

The analysis was conducted throughout the data collection process and focused on issues as they relate to each of the specific research questions [53]. The process of analysis included open coding, creating categories and abstraction, moving from specific to more general to create a picture of the larger whole. This method of analysis was chosen to facilitate the identification of themes in the decision-making process related to pregnancy termination. We conducted inductive detection of the primary themes that emerged, using textual analysis of overt discourse to determine themes explicitly stated, and of the latent discourse [54]. Two coders read and reread transcripts separately (one in Hebrew, one in Arabic) to identify potential codes, convened to create a common coding system through discussion, and then separately coded text [55]. This process continued until agreement and matching. Qualitative data are presented through participants’ direct quotes to illustrate findings.

The analysis emphasized the component of affect both in the process of risk communication between the women and the physicians and its role in the women’s decision to continue the pregnancy. A thematic analysis was carried out within and across groups, enabling us to identify issues shared by women and doctors [56, 57].


Different topics arose regarding the women’s decision-making process, including their views on religious leaders; the husband’s degree of support; their view on the consequences of having a baby with congenital defects, etc. The same issues were not raised by every interviewee, and their reactions were not homogenous (see Table 3). All of the women raised two components: religious and emotional. In the findings, we present how the women and the doctors express the religious component. We will refer to the emotional component of the communication between the doctor and the women.

Table 3 Table of Considerations Affecting Abortion Refusal

Religious influence

All of interviewees mentioned the belief in God as a reason to continue the pregnancy despite the test results. Along with the religious prohibition to terminate pregnancy, half of the interviewees emphasized fatalism as a reason to continue the pregnancy. The women mentioned fatalistic beliefs that helped maintain optimism regarding the pregnancy, even if they chose to undergo all of the recommended medical tests.

Religious and social factors, without reference to emotional component according to doctors

The study findings of the doctors indicated that the decision-making process for women regarding pregnancy termination or continuation was affected by religious, cultural, social and personal considerations. The doctors did not mention “maternal affect” as a factor for Muslim women in their decision to continue their pregnancies.

Maternal affect

In all of the interviews with the women, they mentioned the emotional element as dominant in decision-making. All of the interviewees discussed bonding with the fetus: “I will not give him up,” “I feel the fetus moving,” “my flesh and blood.” This was surprising because it was raised in all of the interviews, along with the religious element, and was stronger than normative and cultural reasons (Table 4).

Table 4 Selected quotes from women participants in the study indicating “maternal emotion” as the main reason for refusing an abortion

Effective risk communication according to the doctors: staying objective

All of the doctors emphasized their obligation to respect the woman’s decision and most described maintaining a “neutral stance” indicative of the approach of nondirectiveness that helps patients to make the best decisions for themselves and their families as judged from their own perspectives [38]. As part of maintaining neutrality, according to all interviewees, most of the doctors emphasized providing the patient with all relevant information without making a personal recommendation.

“My duty is only to explain to her. I am not responsible for telling her whether to continue or terminate the pregnancy…”(Interviewee 2) Most doctors did not address the emotional component of risk communication at all. However, three of them did mention the emotional component, only to contend that as doctors, it is not their job to offer emotional support. The following quote shows that the interviewee believes that the women need emotional support, but that doctors do not need to be the ones providing this support:

“Of course you have to support the woman emotionally, you can involve a psychologist, social worker but from my experience, women usually tolerate it well.”(Interviewee 5)

Only one addressed the emotional aspect of communicating the risk and mentioned women’s discourse about guilt: “They start asking, could it be because I did this or because I didn’t do that, some of them develop guilty feelings, I have to explain to them that it’s not their fault…” (Interviewee 4)

According to all of the doctors interviewed, providing information not only enables the women make decisions but also helps them cope with the diagnosis. An interesting point that arose repeatedly in the interviews with medical specialists regarding the information conveyed to the patient concerned the legal question of medical malpractice. It appears that doctors’ fear of malpractice suits is a central factor affecting the importance they attached to conveying complete information. One interviewee explained that the fear of malpractice suits influences the relationship between doctor and patient:

“We present the results to the family and the family or couple are the ones who decide….but people do not always think this through, and therefore they don’t make the right decision, and sure enough… After the baby is born with a defect they remember ‘the doctor did not explain it to us, he did explain it to us,’ … Today doctors seek to protect themselves against lawsuits…” (Interviewee 3)

Effective risk communication: Doctors’ emotional involvement

The patient interviews indicate that how the attending doctor communicated the risk influenced the women’s decisions. One interviewee described her feelings regarding how the doctor treated her:

“The tests done during pregnancy are very important. But you need a doctor who knows how to proceed and how to make decisions. A doctor who knows how to communicate and to convey the message to women in a way that doesn’t insult them. Doctors today learn about women… every new incident teaches them something new – as though we were mice in a lab experiment… They don’t care about our feelings. They treat us like animals without feelings or hearts.”

Doctors’ lack of empathy and dry communication of risk without addressing the emotional aspect was difficult for most of the women. Moreover, some interviewees maintained that the doctors pressured them to terminate the pregnancy, without considering their view:

“I’m mad about how the doctor talked to me. There are doctors who don’t know how to talk or communicate with women. As if they’re talking to a lump of clay or piece of a wall that does not have a heart or feelings. He just told me about the diagnosis in a very rough way. He said it like this: ‘Get off the bed, the fetus in your womb is deformed… you have to abort it… Come on, Abdallah, sign for an abortion.’ I was shocked.”

Some of the interviewees also mentioned that they felt that the doctors were afraid of malpractice suits and therefore encouraged pregnancy termination. Some of the interviewees also expressed distrust of the doctor and of the accuracy of the tests: “…Not every medical person can decipher the results correctly. I think the level of accuracy is 50% or I would even say less than 50%.”


This study contributes both on the theoretical and applied levels in light of a substantial rise in congenital anomalies among the Arab Muslim community in Israel [58]. The factors that affect the decisions of Muslim women in Israel whether to abort or to continue their pregnancy after discovering a congenital anomaly are diverse and involve cultural and social aspects (especially family), but mainly religious considerations. Most studies about Muslim women’s decision to continue their pregnancies despite test results that indicate congenital anomalies reveal that the factors that influence their decision are religious, socioeconomic, and cultural considerations and a worldview influenced by a belief in fatalism [5962]. Many of our findings conform with these known factors.

The finding that was unexpected and that recurred in the interviews with the women was the emotional element. The women mentioned that they felt the fetus’s movements and that giving it up would be giving up motherhood. Even studies that raise other considerations (sex of the fetus, fetal age, quality of life of the newborn) do not raise the emotional element [63, 64]. This has not been raised in previous studies of Muslim women at high risk of giving birth to a fetus with a defect, and that is a significant contribution of the present study.

According to risk communication literature, emotional affect is important [3941]. These studies reinforce the findings of this study, that for women, decision-making is affected not only by information but also by their feelings towards the fetus and towards the doctor. Here it should be emphasized that emotion does not occur in a vacuum and is often influenced by cultural norms, pressures and considerations. Decisions are influenced by many factors, some of which are deeply embedded in society and include social status, geographical location, level of social, cultural and economic development, as well as access to jobs and patriarchal norms [65]. In addition, it has been noted that the collectivist tendency is more widespread and deeply rooted than individualist tendencies in Arab societies, and as such, individual decisions can be seen as stemming from the values of the collective [66].

However, some relatively recent studies discuss emotions as stemming from individual considerations, and not influenced by the dominant cultural practices in a totalizing way [67]. Emotions can be influenced by external factors, but at the same time, can be seen as autonomous feelings that the women interviewees feel towards the fetus they are carrying. Studies indicate that the process of testing and deciding to abort are emotionally complex. Many studies have suggested a correlation between doctor-patient communication and patient compliance with the treatment suggested by the doctor [68]. Care communication literature and the patient-centered communication approach emphasize the importance of the emotional element on patient health [69]. Productive dialogue and communication must include technical and emotional considerations [44].

The findings of this study emphasize the disparities between the doctors and the women regarding the emotional element in their communication. The doctors in this study maintained it was important for them to respect the patient’s decisions and to refrain from emotional involvement (non-directive counselling). Many of the women interviewees felt that this expressed insensitivity. The interviews with the women found that many of them felt the doctors were pressuring them to terminate the pregnancy. Therefore, the doctors’ request to repeat the medical diagnosis, interpret it, explain its significance and consequences – which the doctors perceived as professional behavior – was sometimes interpreted by the women as intervention and disrespect for the woman’s decision to continue the pregnancy. In that respect there is a gap between the doctors’ perception of themselves as neutral, professional and respectful of the patient’s decision, and the patients’ perception of the doctor’s behavior as insensitive. This can be described by a risk communication paradigm (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Perception of professional distance in conveying information from doctor to patient

Furthermore, the doctors are perceived as bearers of bad news [70]. Many doctors choose to maintain emotional distance from patients to avoid angry or critical reactions [71]. Doctors perceive themselves as objective professionals, who should not express emotions when conveying bad news to a patient [72]. For patients, it is important for the doctor to break the news with direct and concise explanations, including her in decision-making, treatment and prognosis, encouraging the patient to express feelings and questions, and adjusting the message to the patient’s culture, religion and language [73]. Not only does communication with patients impact on the patient’s understanding of the risks, compliance with the suggested treatment and the outcome of the treatment itself, but studies have found that such communication can also prevent lawsuits [45]. It is important for doctors to understand the emotional element in risk communication, both in respecting women’s emotions and in creating an emotional interaction.


The present study shows that the emotional element is no less dominant than religious and social elements. The emotional bond the women create with the fetus during their pregnancies, and the absence of doctors’ empathy when communicating risk impact women’s decision-making. Doctors should undergo training in risk communication, to emotionally support women in the decision-making process. Doctors’ difficulty dealing with the emotional aspects of communicating bad news suggests the need for cooperation between doctors and social workers in communicating with patients. Based on the findings of this study, we recommend compiling guidelines for doctors to help them to show empathy and to improve communication with Arab Muslim patients. Based on our findings, it seems that doctors approach the women from a stereotypcal perspective that assumes that the religious aspect will be the decisive one in making the decision to continue or terminate the pregnancy. In addition, our findings show that doctors do not think it is their job to address the emotional component, but we want to suggest that this is a crucial aspect of their jobs. They need to address the emotional element in their communication with patients or arrange for a social worker to accompany them in their meetings with patientsto offer emotional support to the female patients who face a difficult decision. We recommend for further studies on how the emotional element can be developed in the doctors’ communication with patients pregnant with fetuses diagnosed with congenital anomalies.

Study limitations

Limitations of the present study include that since it is a qualitative study it does not include a representative sample of the study population. Another limitation is that the research is based only on self-reporting and we did not carry out observations of the patient-doctor interaction. Limitations include the recruitment from one area in one country and snowball sampling method. We asked doctors their views on pregnancy termination, but we did not ask them about their religious affiliation or whether or not their views were influenced by religious beliefs.



Obstetrics and Gynecology


  1. 1.

    Statham H, Solomou W, Chitty L. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: psychological effects on women in low-risk pregnancies. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(4):731–47. doi:10.1053/beog.2000.0108.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rauch ER, Smulian JC, DePrince K, Ananth CV, Marcella SW. New Jersey Fetal Abnormalities R. Pregnancy interruption after second trimester diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies: the New Jersey Fetal Abnormalities Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(4):1492–7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Awwad R, Veach PM, Bartels DM, LeRoy BS. Culture and acculturation influences on Palestinian perceptions of prenatal genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2008;17(1):101–16. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9131-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alsulaiman A, Hewison J, Abu-Amero KK, Ahmed S, Green JM, Hirst J. Attitudes to prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for 30 conditions among women in Saudi Arabia and the UK. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(11):1109–13. doi:10.1002/pd.3967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    WHO. Congenital anomalies. 2016. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.

  6. 6.

    Zlotogora J, Haklai Z, Rotem N, Georgi M, Rubin L. The impact of prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy on the relative incidence of malformations at birth among Jews and Muslim Arabs in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J. 2010;12(9):539–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Al-Jader LN, Parry-Langdon N, Smith RJ. Survey of attitudes of pregnant women towards Down syndrome screening. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20(1):23–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jaber L, Dolfin T, Shohat T, Halpern GJ, Reish O, Fejgin M. Prenatal diagnosis for detecting congenital malformations: acceptance among Israeli Arab women. Isr Med Assoc J. 2000;2(5):346–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Beckerleg SE, Lewando‐Hundt GA, Borkan JM, Abu Saad KJ, Belmaker I. Eliciting local voices using natural group interviews. Anthropol Med. 1997;4(3):273–88. doi:10.1080/13648470.1997.9964538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lewando-Hundt G. Evaluation and improvement of maternal and child health services for Palestinians in Gaza and Bedouin in the Negev. Final report on CT93AV12-031. Brussels: European Commission, DGXII1999.

  11. 11.

    Lewando-Hundt G, Forman MR. Autonomy access and care: a study of Palestinian Bedouin of the Negev in Israel. Soc Sci Health. 1997;3(2):96–112.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shoham-Vardi I, Weiner N, Weitzman D, Levcovich A. Termination of pregnancy: attitudes and behavior of women in a traditional society. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24(11):869–75. doi:10.1002/pd.867.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Erfani A, McQuillan K. Rates of induced abortion in Iran: the roles of contraceptive use and religiosity. Stud Fam Plann. 2008;39(2):111–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jaber L, Halpern GJ, Samara S. Prenatal testing and termination of future pregnancies in Arab mothers of children with severe defects: impact of Moslem cleric or physician on the decision making. OJGen. 2011;1(3):54–9. doi:10.4236/ojgen.2011.13010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lewando-Hundt G, Shoham-Vardi I, Beckerleg S, Belmaker I, Kassem F, Jaafar AA. Knowledge, action and resistance: the selective use of pre-natal screening among Bedouin women of the Negev, Israel. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(4):561–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zahed L, Nabulsi M, Bou-Ghanim M, Usta I. Acceptance of prenatal diagnosis for genetic disorders in Lebanon. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19(12):1109–12.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    El-Beshlawy A, El-Shekha A, Momtaz M, Said F, Hamdy M, Osman O, et al. Prenatal diagnosis for thalassaemia in Egypt: what changed parents’ attitude? Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(8):777–82. doi:10.1002/pd.3901.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Saleem R, Gofin R, Ben-Neriah Z, Boneh A. Variables influencing parental perception of inherited metabolic diseases before and after genetic counselling. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1998;21(7):769–80.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zlotogora J, Reshef N. Prenatal testing for genetic disorders among Arabs. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18(3):219–24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Al Aqeel AI. Islamic ethical framework for research into and prevention of genetic diseases. Nat Genet. 2007;39(11):1293–8. doi:10.1038/ng.2007.14.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Mannien J, Ghaly MM, Verhoeven PS, Hutton EK, Reinders HS. The role of religion in decision-making on antenatal screening of congenital anomalies: a qualitative study amongst Muslim Turkish origin immigrants. Midwifery. 2014;30(3):297–302. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ahmed S, Green JM, Hewison J. Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for thalassaemia in pregnant Pakistani women in the North of England. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(3):248–57. doi:10.1002/pd.1391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Arif MO, Fatmi Z, Pardeep B, Ali T, Iqbal H, Bangash HK, et al. Attitudes and perceptions about prenatal diagnosis and induced abortion among adults of Pakistani population. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(12):1149–55. doi:10.1002/pd.2144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Weitzman D, Shoham-Vardi I, Elbedour K, Belmaker I, Siton Y, Carmi R. Factors affecting the use of prenatal testing for fetal anomalities in a traditional society. Community Genet. 2000;3(2):61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zahed L, Bou-Dames J. Acceptance of first-trimester prenatal diagnosis for the haemoglobinopathies in Lebanon. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17(5):423–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Remennick LI, Hetsroni A. Public attitudes toward abortion in Israel: a research note. Soc Sci Quart. 2001;82(2):420–31. doi:10.1111/0038-4941.00033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jaber L, Halpern G, Samara S. Prenatal testing and termination of future pregnancies in Arab mothers of children with severe defects: impact of Moslem cleric or physician on the decision making. Open J Genet. 2011;1:54–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bromiker R, Glam-Baruch M, Gofin R, Hammerman C, Amitai Y. Association of parental consanguinity with congenital malformations among Arab newborns in Jerusalem. Clin Genet. 2004;66(1):63–6. doi:10.1111/j.0009-9163.2004.00264.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Winnicott DW. The capacity to be alone. Int J Psychoanal. 1958;39(5):416–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Raphael-Leff J. Healthy maternal ambivalence. Stud Matern. 2010;2(1):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cohen LJ, Slade A. The psychology and psychopathology of pregnancy: reorganization and transformation. In: Zeanah Jr CH, editor. Handbook of infant mental health. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2000. p. 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cranley MS. Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nurs Res. 1981;30(5):281–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mercer RT. Becoming a mother versus maternal role attainment. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(3):226–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lalor J, Begley CM, Galavan E. Recasting Hope: a process of adaptation following fetal anomaly diagnosis. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(3):462–72. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Skotko BG. Prenatally diagnosed Down syndrome: mothers who continued their pregnancies evaluate their health care providers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):670–7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Michie S, Bron F, Bobrow M, Marteau TM. Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: an empirical study. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60(1):40–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Williams S, Weinman J, Dale J, Newman S. Patient expectations: what do primary care patients want from the GP and how far does meeting expectations affect patient satisfaction? Fam Pract. 1995;12(2):193–201.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Harper P, Clarke A. Genetics, Society and Clinical Practice. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Flynn J, Satterfield TA. Gender, race, and perceived risk: the ‘white male’ effect. Health Risk Soc. 2000;2(2):159–72. doi:10.1080/713670162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(2):267–86.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 2004;24(2):311–22. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Visschers VHM, Wiedemann PM, Gutscher H, Kurzenhäuser S, Seidl R, Jardine CG, et al. Affect-inducing risk communication: current knowledge and future directions. J Risk Res. 2012;15(3):257–71. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.634521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Slovic P, Peters E, Finucane ML, Macgregor DG. Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychol. 2005;24(4 Suppl):S35–40. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Gregory R, Peters E, Slovic P. Making decisions about prescription drugs: a study of doctor–patient communication. Health Risk Soc. 2011;13(4):347–71. doi:10.1080/13698575.2011.575455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Halamish-Shani A. Medicine, law and communication. Med Law J. 2001;24:3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Street Jr RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295–301. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bylund CL, Makoul G. Examining empathy in medical encounters: an observational study using the empathic communication coding system. Health Commun. 2005;18(2):123–40. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1802_2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Paling J. Strategies to help patients understand risks. BMJ. 2003;327(7417):745–8. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.745.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Diette GB, Rand C. The contributing role of health-care communication to health disparities for minority patients with asthma. Chest. 2007;132(5 Suppl):802S–9S. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Creswell JW, Hanson WE, Clark Plano VL, Morales A. Qualitative research designs: selection and implementation. Couns Psychol. 2007;35(2):236–64. doi:10.1177/0011000006287390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE. Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(7):1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Clarke JN, Everest MM. Cancer in the mass print media: fear, uncertainty and the medical model. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(10):2591–600. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Kay K, Milstein B. Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Field Methods. 1998;10(2):31–6. doi:10.1177/1525822x980100020301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research, techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Charmaz K. Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage; 2000. p. 509–35.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Na’amnih W, Romano-Zelekha O, Kabaha A, Rubin LP, Bilenko N, Jaber L, et al. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages and associated factors among Israeli Bedouins. J Community Genet. 2014;5(4):395–8. doi:10.1007/s12687-014-0188-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ahmed S, Atkin K, Hewison J, Green J. The influence of faith and religion and the role of religious and community leaders in prenatal decisions for sickle cell disorders and thalassaemia major. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(9):801–9. doi:10.1002/pd.1507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Atkin K, Ahmed S, Hewison J, Green JM. Decision-making and ante-natal screening for sickle cell and thalassaemia disorders: to what extent do faith and religious identity mediate choice? Curr Sociol. 2008;56(1):77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bryant LD, Ahmed S, Ahmed M, Jafri H, Raashid Y. ‘All is done by Allah’. Understandings of Down syndrome and prenatal testing in Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(8):1393–9. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Alkuraya FS, Kilani RA. Attitude of Saudi families affected with hemoglobinopathies towards prenatal screening and abortion and the influence of religious ruling (Fatwa). Prenat Diagn. 2001;21(6):448–51. doi:10.1002/pd.76.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ahmed S, Hewison J, Green JM, Cuckle HS, Hirst J, Thornton JG. Decisions about testing and termination of pregnancy for different fetal conditions: a qualitative study of European white and Pakistani mothers of affected children. J Genet Couns. 2008;17(6):560–72. doi:10.1007/s10897-008-9176-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Drugan A, Greb A, Johnson MP, Krivchenia EL, Uhlmann WR, Moghissi KS, et al. Determinants of parental decisions to abort for chromosome abnormalities. Prenat Diagn. 1990;10(8):483–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Moghadam VM. Women, structure, and agency in the Middle East: introduction and overview to feminist formations’ special issue on women in the Middle East. Fem Form. 2010;22(3):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Erickson CD, al-Timimi NR. Providing mental health services to Arab Americans: recommendations and considerations. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2001;7(4):308–27.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Charrad M. Kinship, Islam, or oil: culprits of gender inequality? Polit Gend. 2009;5(4):546–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(7):903–18.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Hall JA, Harrigan JA, Rosenthal R. Nonverbal behavior in clinician—patient interaction. Appl Prev Psychol. 1995;4(1):21–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Mueller PS. Breaking bad news to patients. The SPIKES approach can make this difficult task easier. Postgrad Med. 2002;112(3):15–6. 8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ptacek JT, Ellison NM. Health care providers’ perspectives on breaking bad news to patients. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2000;23(2):51–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Buckman R. Breaking bad news: why is it still so difficult? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;288(6430):1597–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Sharp MC, Strauss RP, Lorch SC. Communicating medical bad news: parents’ experiences and preferences. J Pediatr. 1992;121(4):539–46.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank the study participants for sharing their experiences.


The authors have no funding to declare.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact author for data requests.

Authors’ contributions

AGE has supervised over the research. AGE and NAES have both design the research. NAES conducted the interviews and transcript. AGE and NAES have both analyzed the qualitative data. AGE and NAES have contributed equally to the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Anat Gesser-Edelsburg, Ph.D, is a senior lecturer, the head of the Health Promotion Department at the School of Public Health and the founding director of the Health and Risk Communication Research Center at University of Haifa, Israel. Her most recent book-length publication is Risk Communication and Infectious Diseases in an Age of Digital Media (2016, Routledge). Address for correspondence: School of Public Health, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave. Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel. Email:

Nour Abed Elhadi Shahbari, BSc, MHA, is a Ph.D candidate at the School of Public Health, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave. Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel. Email:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All the study participants gave their consent to publish the research findings.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Committee on Health and Welfare Sciences, The Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences at the University of Haifa, confirmation number 285/14. All the study participants gave their consent to participate in the research.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anat Gesser-Edelsburg.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gesser-Edelsburg, A., Shahbari, N.A.E. Decision-making on terminating pregnancy for Muslim Arab women pregnant with fetuses with congenital anomalies: maternal affect and doctor-patient communication. Reprod Health 14, 49 (2017).

Download citation


  • Decision-making on terminating pregnancy
  • Pregnant Muslim Arab women
  • Fetuses with congenital anomalies
  • Maternal affect
  • Doctor-patient risk communication