Pathways to increased coverage: an analysis of time trends in contraceptive need and use among adolescents and young women in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda

Table 1 Difference in change in met need over time in younger vs. older women

		Change in met need for family planning from T1 to T3				Difference-in-differences
Country	Age Group	T1	T3	Relative risk^a	p-value	Relative risk ratio^b	p-value
Kenya	15–24 years	34.2%	64.8%	1.89	< 0.001	1.38	< 0.001
Kenya	25–49 years	52.7%	72.6%	1.38	< 0.001	1.38	< 0.001
Rwanda	15–24 years	11.1%	58.8%	5.30	< 0.001	0.81	0.124
Rwanda	25–49 years	9.7%	63.4%	6.53	< 0.001	0.81	0.124
Tanzania	15–24 years	39.8%	47.5%	1.19	0.141	0.91	0.352
Tanzania	25–49 years	37.4%	49.2%	1.32	0.001	0.91	0.352
Uganda	15–24 years	30.6%	41.5%	1.36	< 0.001	0.82	0.017
Uganda	25–49 years	27.7%	45.8%	1.65	< 0.001	0.82	0.017

^aThe relative risk compares the met need in T3 to that in T1 for the specified age group
^bThe relative risk ratio compares the relative risk of met need over time for women aged 15–24 years to that of women aged 25–49 years for the specified country

ISSN: 1742-4755