Skip to content

Advertisement

Reproductive Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Factors related to healthy sexual and contraceptive behaviors in undergraduate students at university of Seville: a cross- sectional study

Reproductive Health201714:179

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0444-9

Received: 15 October 2017

Accepted: 15 December 2017

Published: 29 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Young people are a group of population with sexual risk-taking behaviors. Despite efforts to inform them it is common for them to adopt risk conducts during their stay at University. The aim of this research was to assess knowledge, attitudes and experiences on sexual health and contraceptives and factors related to risk behaviors in university students.

Methods

A cross- sectional analytical study was carried out from February to April 2014 among undergraduate students at University of Seville. A self-administered questionnaire was filled in by participants. Data analysis was performed using SPSS V22. Descriptive statistics were used to show data. A P-value of 5% (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 566 students responded to the questionnaire. 47.3% (267) were male and 52.6% (297) female. About sexual behavior: 93.3% of participants were sexually active last year. 58.3% had had sex under alcohol effect and 18% under drugs effect. About contraceptive behavior: 86.9% used a contraceptive method during their first sexual relation, the male condom being the most used (90.6%). Currently, the most used contraceptives are the male condom, and hormonal pills. The participants’ answers about their knowledge on contraceptives and STIs (sexual transmission infections) showed weaknesses. Participants who had received sexual and contraceptive education showed more knowledge (p < 0.001). We did not find differences about knowledge on contraceptives and STIs by age (p = 0.056). Level of knowledge is less in young people who use coitus interruptus or none as a contraceptive method (p < 0.001). We observed differences by frequency of sex since young people who had sex more frequently showed more knowledge about contraceptives and STI (p < 0.001). There are more women that had a partner than men (p = 0.003) and their attitudes and experiences on sex are healthier. Females showed more knowledge about management of hormonal contraceptives and medical controls (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Factors that contribute to having a healthier behavior on sexuality and contraception are age, gender and background in health issues, showing greater knowledge and less risky behavior. Programing reproductive health programs at university should be continued.

Plain summary

A cross- sectional study was carried out with students from different backgrounds at University of Seville (Spain) with the objective of assessing knowledge, attitudes and experiences on sexual health and contraceptive behavior. Participants were sexually active, and the male condom and contraceptive pills were the contraceptive method that was most used. They recognized having had sex under the effect of alcohol and drugs. Their knowledge about sexual transmission infections is weak and should be improved. Participants who had attended some kind of course about the topic showed a healthier sexual behavior. Gender is a factor to be taken into consideration, woman had less risky behaviors than men and had more information about sexual and medical controls. It is necessary to continue working on reproductive health programs at university with young people.

Background

Adolescent and young people are more sexually active than any other group of the population. They show sexual risk-taking behaviors and an early age of sexual initiation, unplanned sex and several sexual couples [1]. Otherwise, they are more likely to use contraception inconsistently and this makes them a very vulnerable segment of the population [2, 3].

The non-use of contraceptives has a consequence of not only unplanned pregnancies but also sexually transmitted infections. The rates of STI among young people are more often every day. It is estimated that 15–24 years old youths account for half of all new STI infections [4]. According to WHO, each year, there are an estimated 357 million new infections with 1 out of 4 STIs: chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis and trichomoniasis [5], In Spain, data from different studies also reported a high prevalence of STI in the last year [6, 7].

For many years, governments and organizations have dedicated efforts on sexual and reproductive health educating young people [8]. School curriculums on sexual health at secondary education level are more common every day. Despite the fact that these programs were implemented throughout the world, they share many aspects in common [9].

Sexual and contraceptive education is a good tool to ensure that young people have the information needed to follow a healthy sexual life [10]. Schools have the potential for reducing adolescent sexual risk-taking [11]. The question of whether sexual education is being effective has been assessed in some studies [2, 12]. COMPAS and CUIDATE programs were carried out in Spain and showed effectiveness when using contraceptives and knowledge about STI, and less effectiveness in maintaining the intention to use condoms and the delay of their first oral sex experience. Intention was measured and had positive findings; otherwise, neither intervention had a long-term impact on behavioral variables [12].

Knowledge, attitudes and practices related to contraceptives and sexual behaviors are crucial to influence a healthy lifestyle [13]. Young people have to learn about sexuality, STI and contraception [3, 14]. However, studies show that receiving the information is not always related to adequate sexual and contraceptive attitude and more effective strategies of behavioral change in individuals who engage in sexual activity are needed [15, 16]. On the other hand, information is not synonymous of a healthy lifestyle. Information and motivation may influence behavioral skills which produce behavior changes [17].

Several studies focus on the importance of sexual education from the earliest school years [18]. Programs alone cannot avoid risking behaviors in young people, but may change sexual and protective behaviors in desired directions and may be an important component in larger initiatives [9].

A review performed by Kirby [9], concluded that adolescents that attended programs about sexuality, contraception and prevention of STIs more often had fewer sexual risk behaviors.

In Andalusia, the population of this study, a program that includes sexual and reproductive education was taught in secondary schools called FORMA JOVEN from 2001.

In the guideline of “Forma Joven” the schools included are required to offer 6 to 10 h of health education weekly, or even more than 15 h in some of them [19]. However, this initiative is widely considered to be inadequate for its insufficient impact on health styles, proven by the fact that no participating students obtained similar scores in studies carried out [20]. If we add lack of formal sexual education from parents, [21, 22] it turns out that young people are uninformed and need to obtain information from other sources.

Age for the first intercourse is around 14–16 years according studies published [23] so when these students are enrolled at university, they already have an active sexual life. This study aims to explore students’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences on sexual health and contraceptives and factors related to risk behaviors to develop educational programs at university, if needed.

Methods

Study design and setting

A cross sectional analytic study was conducted from February to April 2014 at the University of Seville. We recruited female and male undergraduates from different degrees.

Student were selected according to the year of study from all knowledge areas: Health Sciences, Social Sciences, Engineering and Architecture; Sciences and; Humanities and Art.

A total of 3.349 students were randomly selected by groups (classes). The final sample size was estimated to give the study a confident interval of 99%, distribution of answers of 50% and estimated error of 5%. Inclusion criteria was acceptance of informed consent and to be enrolled in any degree at University of Seville.

The outcomes variables included knowledge about contraception, sexual behavior and contraceptive use. Other variables were sex, age of participant, education level and religion.

Data collection

Prior to data collection, the questionnaire was piloted among 30 students to identify possible errors. Linguistic difficulties were not found.

The test was administered to students in a class at university to answer it. This was a self-administered questionnaire with closed and open questions.

The questionnaire was structured in three parts: one, about sociodemographic characteristics. The second part, about respondent’s sexual experience and contraceptive usage. The third part, assessed knowledge on contraceptives and sexual transmission infections (STI) through 9 items developed by the authors and based on the literature documenting some frequent errors about contraceptive methods and STI. Participants had to answer to nine dichotomous items with true or false:
  1. 1.

    Coitus interruptus is a very safe contraceptive.

     
  2. 2.

    If a condom is washed carefully, it is possible to reuse it several times.

     
  3. 3.

    To use hormonal pills, you have to have an appointment with a general practitioner at primary health Centre.

     
  4. 4.

    Having sex during menstruation is safe to prevent pregnancies.

     
  5. 5.

    Hormonal pills are effective if you take them before sex.

     
  6. 6.

    Hormonal pills protect against STI.

     
  7. 7.

    The only method that protects you against STI is a condom.

     
  8. 8.

    All sexually active women should perform a Papanicolau annually.

     
  9. 9.

    STI are common in our society.

     

Every right answer was evaluated with 1 point, the minimum being 0 points and maximum 9 points.

This brief questionnaire was validated and showed internal and external consistency. Internal consistency reliability was measured with Kuder-Richardson formula 20 (KR-20) for dichotomous scores and was equal to 0,57. In addition, an exploratory factorial analysis was performed (KMO = 0,67; χ2(28, N = 566) =350,77; p<,001), and 3 factors were found with a self-value higher than 1, explaining variance of 54,79%. The model presents a good global adjustment χ2(14, N = 566) =17,48, p = .232. Quotient χ2 among liberty grades is inferior to a 3 (17,48/14 = 1,25), and the valor of CFI is 0,97 and RMSEA is de 0,02.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from Ethic Committee of University of Seville. Every questionnaire had a brief explanation about aims of research and asked for informed consent. Those students who filled it in consented to participate in the study. All questionnaires were collected by an investigator from the research team. Confidentiality was guaranteed using anonymous questionnaires and participants were informed about the right to not answer.

Statistical methods

Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 22.0. Descriptive analysis was used to describe participants’ sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behaviors, knowledge and use of contraception. Student’s t-test was used to compare means between groups for normally distributed continuous variables and U Mann Whitney was used for skewed continuous data. Quantitative variables were compared by Pearson chi-square test. The chi square test was used to determine the association between categorical variables such as gender, grouped age, knowledge area, and sexual behavior. A P-value of 5% (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 566 students participated with a response rate of 98%. 12 students (2%) did not return the questionnaire filled in. As is shown in Table 1, most participants (94.8%) were aged under 25 years-old, 47.3% (267) were men and 52.6% (297) women. Among the different religious affiliations, catholic (58.7%) was the most prominent. Among responding students, 55.7% lived with family during the course; 508 (92.5%) most respondents referred to be heterosexuals.
Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants (n = 566)

 

Number

Percent

Agea

  < 20

151

27.1

 21–24

377

67.7

  > 25

29

5.2

Sex

 Women

297

52.6

 Men

267

47.3

Religionb

 Catholic

307

58.9

 Muslim

7

1.2

 Atheism/Agnosticism

215

38.7

 Others

37

1.2

Residenceb

 Parents

314

55.7

 Shared flat

195

34.5

 University residence

23

4.1

 With partner

31

5.5

 Others

3

0.2

Sexual identityc

 Heterosexual

508

92.5

 Homosexual

23

4.2

 Bisexual

18

3.3

Previous informationb

 Yes

373

65.3

 No

193

34.7

Educationd

 From School

264

90.4

 Family

12

4.1

 Internet

2

0.7

 Health Centre/Health providers

14

4.8

a n = 557; b n = 566, c n = 549, d n = 292

65.3% received sexual and contraceptive education. Main sources of information about sexuality are school in 90.4%; healthcare professionals (4.8%), friends/family (4.1%) and Internet (0.7%).

Sexual behavior

93.3% of participants had already had sexual intercourse. Their sentimental situation was single (not involved in a sentimental relationship) of 44.5%. 55.1% (311) affirmed to have a partner; for under a year 23.1%, between 1 and 2 years 18.4% and over 2 years, 45.2%. Age of first intercourse was M (SD) = 17.03 (6.43) years-old and 78.4% had their sexual relationship with their boyfriend/girlfriend. 95.5% of participants had had some kind of sexual relationship.

91.7% had only had a sexual partner last year, 6.2% more than one, and 2.1% more than two. Frequency of sexual relations was 1–2 times in a week for 50.1%, 18.9% 1–2 in a month, 9.2% 1–2 in a year, and 21.8% more than twice in a week.

41.7% had never had sexual relations under alcohol effect, 57.2% sometimes, and 1.1% always drank alcohol in the context of sex. However, under drugs effects, never 82% and 16.7% sometimes, and always consumed drugs and had sex 1.3%. 52.7% always enjoyed their sexual relations, 40.7% sometimes, and never 6.6%. A 9% referred to having been forced to have sex.

Contraceptive behavior

86.9% used a contraceptive method during their first sexual relation, the male condom being the most used (90.6%). An 8.2% used coitus interruptus.

Currently, 8.1% use coitus interruptus as a method, 64% condom and 23.4% hormonal pills.

A total of 32.6% had used emergency contraception: 21.3% used a post coital pill, at least, once; and 11.4% more than once. A 2.6% confirmed having had a legal abortion.

Knowledge and attitude about contraceptives and TSI

The participants’ answers about their knowledge on contraceptives and TSIs are shown in Table 2. We can observe that lower scores are related with knowledge about TSI. The median of the global score was 7.11 points, minimum 2 points and maximum 8 points and SD = 1.20. 45.1% had full right answers and 26.7% had 7 right responses. Item 9 was the most failed, right answers were between 78.9 and 97.7%.
Table 2

Scores of scales about contraceptive use and sexual behavior

Items

True

N (%)

False

N (%)

% correct

Coitus interruptus is a very safe contraceptive.

16 (2.9)

538 (97.1)

97.1

if condom is washed carefully, it is possible to reuse it several times.

13 (2.3)

541 (97.7)

97,7

To use hormonal pills, you have to appoint a general practitioner at primary health Centre

459 (84.5)

83 (15.3)

84,5

Having sex during menstruation is safe to prevent pregnancies

43 (7.8)

507 (92.2)

92,2

Hormonal pills are effective if you take it before sex

77 (14.2)

464 (85.8)

85,8

Hormonal pills protect against STI

42 (7.7)

507 (92.3)

92,3

The only method that protects you against STI is condom

439 (80)

110 (20)

80,0

All women active sexually has to perform a Papanicolau annually

419 (78.9)

112 (21.1)

78,9

STI are common in our society

75 (13.9)

465 (86.1)

13,9

Participants who had received sexual and contraceptive education showed more knowledge M(SD) = 7.28 (1.04) vs 6.82 (1.41), p < 0.001. On the other hand, respondents that were in a relationship had more knowledge, 7.31 (1.02) vs 6.87 (1.35), p < 0.001. Those women who had had a legal abortion obtained a lower score in the scale 6.43 (1.95) vs 7.13 (1.18), p = 0.034.

We did not find differences about knowledge on contraceptives and STIs by age, p = 0.056.

Level of knowledge is less in young people who use coitus interruptus or none as contraceptive method, p < 0.001. However, those that use a hormonal method or double method showed better scores.

Finally, we observed differences by frequency of sex since young people who had sex more frequently showed more knowledge about contraceptives and STI, p < 0.001.

Comparison by gender, age and studies

As can be seen in Table 3 there are many differences among participants by gender.
Table 3

Distribution of contraceptive use and sexual behavior by sex

 

Women

N = 297

Men

N = 267

p value a

 

n (%)

n (%)

 

First sexual intercourse with a boyfriend

236 (79.46)

158 (59.2)

P < 0.001

Contraceptive use in first intercourse

236 (91.1)

195 (73.03)

P = 0.004

Current contraceptives use

255 (85.8)

234 (87.6)

p > 0.05

Currently in sexual relationship

183 (61.6)

127 (47.6)

P = 0.002

Ever had sexual intercourse

21 (7.07)

22 (8.2)

p > 0.05

Always satisfactory sex

118 (39.7)

144 (53.93)

P = 0.008

Ever used emergency contraception

172 (57.91)

182 (68.16)

P = 0.07

Had unsafe sex in past year

23 (7.74)

42 (15.7)

P = 0.01

Number of sexual partners in the past year, M (SD)

1.07 (0.28)

3.47(2.04)

P = 0.005

Frequency of sex

 1–2 in a week

21 (7.07)

88 (32.95)

 

 1–2 in a month

130 (43.77)

50 (18.72)

P = 0.029

 1–2 in a year

48 (16.16)

34 (12.73)

 

 More than twice a week

14 (4.71)

56 (20.97)

 

Had sex under drugs effect

31 (10.43)

68 (25.46)

P = 0.000

Had sex under alcohol effect

164 (55.21)

157 (58.8)

p > 0.05

Age at first sex, M (SD)

17.48 (9.13)

16.63 (1.97)

p > 0.05

Current contraceptive method

  

P = 0.01

 Coitus interruptus

19 (6.39)

21 (7.86)

 

 Condom

151 (50.84)

167 (62.54)

 

 Hormonal pills

78 (26.26)

37 (13.85)

 

 Others

7 (2.35)

9 (3.37)

 

Had an abortion

7 (2.35)

7 (2.62)

p > 0.05

Sources of information

 School

145 (48.82)

119 (44.56)

 

 Family

6 (2.02)

6 (2.24)

P = 0.001

 Internet

0 (0)

2 (0.74)

 

 Heath providers

14 (4.71)

0 (0)

 

Information about STIs and contraceptives right answers

n (%)

n (%)

p value a

Coitus interruptus is a very safe contraceptive.

286 (96.29)

251 (94)

P = 0.213

if condom is washed carefully, it is possible to reuse it several times.

287 (96.63)

253 (94.75)

P = 0.110

To use hormonal pills, you have to appoint a general practitioner at primary health centre

262 (88.21)

196 (73.4)

P = 0.000

Having sex during menstruation is safe to prevent pregnancies

275 (92.59)

231 (86.51)

P = 0.062

Hormonal pills are effective if you take it before sex

268 (90.23)

195 (73.03)

P = 0.000

Hormonal pills protect against STI

275 (92.59)

231 (86.51)

P = 0.043

The only method that protects you against STI is condom

246 (82.82)

192 (71.91)

P = 0.004

All women active sexually has to perform a Papanicolau annually.

242 (81.48)

176 (65.91)

P = 0.000

STI are common in our society

32 (10.77)

43 (16.10)

P = 0.056

aSignificance tested using F test for continuous variables and 2 test for categorical variables

There are more women that had a partner than men (p = 0.003) and their attitudes and experiences on sex are healthier. Females showed more knowledge about management of hormonal contraceptives and medical controls.

Students older than 25 years old were more often in a romantic relationship (p = 0.003). Aged group between 20 and 25 years had long relationships, over 2 years (p < 0.001). Related to contraceptives, the most used in aged group 20 is the condom and 20–25 years, hormonal pills (p < 0.001). Age is not related with use of emergency contraception (p = 0.098), neither to perform a legal abortion (p = 0.356).

Number of sexual partners in last 12 months is reduced with age, thus frequency of sex (p = 0.02). Use of alcohol with sex is more often at 20–25 years (p < 0.001) and drugs at over 25 years (p < 0.001).

Age group between 20 and 25 are most satisfied sexually (p < 0.001) if compared with other age groups.

Participants that studied a degree in Health Sciences had attended some kind of formation on sexuality and contraception, mainly, at school, in comparison with other fields (p < 0.000).

Use of a contraceptive in the first sexual intercourse showed differences depending on the degree, since students of a degree in Engineering or Architecture did not use any method if compared with other fields (p = 0.04). Otherwise, they most frequently used an inconsistent method such as coitus interruptus (p = 0.03). When we compared knowledge and sexual practices among students of different areas of knowledge, we observed that students enrolled in some degree of health sciences showed healthier behavior than other areas p < 0.001.

Discussion

This study evaluated the knowledge, behaviors, perceptions and use of contraceptives and sexuality among students at University of Seville. Our results showed that the knowledge and sexual practices are suboptimal so it is necessary to continue education at university levels.

Our data described that most students were sexually active at university period. They had their first sexual intercourse at the age of 17, slightly inferior to national statistics that referred the age at 18.2 [24] but higher than the age found by Rodríguez- Carrión et al. that stated at 14 years old [23]. In 2016, Contraception Spanish Society (CSS) published results from a National Survey with 2.200 participants aged 15–49. The main findings of this report are in line with ours about contraceptive pattern on the first sexual intercourse, 2 out of 10 adolescents do not use a contraceptive for their first sexual intercourse, where this most commonly occurs in males [24]. This is based on the assumption that men adopt a riskier attitude than female students. Previous studies already demonstrated that women had a better knowledge and more preventive attitude to risk-taking [25]. This is in line with our findings, women are shown to have more information and adopt healthier behaviors related to sexual relations and use of contraceptives. In general, females showed a greater knowledge and had a safer attitude during first intercourse using a contraceptive. They have more stable sentimental relations while males have more sexual partners in a year contributing to a higher exposure to risks. Other studies reported that males had higher rates of frequency of sex [26] and lower rates of contraception [27]. Besides, females showed more awareness about medical controls during this period of life as shown in the scores in the scale.

Consumption of alcohol in young people is more frequent every day, independently of sex. As women and men used alcohol for fun, because of this, it is very usual that both groups have sex under alcohol effects [28]. But not only alcohol, sometimes under drugs effects as well. Among the sexually active students, 56.8% had a sexual intercourse under alcohol effects and 17.9% were engaging in unsafe sex under drugs presence. The reported prevalence of unsafe sexual was higher in males, although just descriptively. On the other hand, when we compared between females and males having sex under drugs effects, we found that males over 25 were most common. A riskier behavior is reported when they had sex associated with alcohol and drugs [29]. Similarly, Brown et al. observed that alcohol use leads to greater risk-taking behavior including non-use of contraceptive [30]. Rodríguez- Carrión et al. found that adolescents consumed alcohol or drugs before their first sexual intercourse [23]. However, in a multi-country study carried out in 22 countries, it was found that alcohol use in the context of sex did not have a negative effect on contraceptive use [31] and this result is in line with our findings.

In our study, nearly 93.3% of the students were sexually active in the past 12 months. Only 7.8% had never had sex, very similar to 8.3% of the recent national survey of CSS.

The most used contraceptive is the condom among under 20 years and contraceptive pill in 20–25 years group. This finding is in line with national data and reported in other studies [32, 33].

A rate of 32.6% used emergency contraception. We did not ask about motivation to use it, but usually it is used in the case of unprotected sexual intercourse or failure of a regular contraceptive method, so young people should be made aware of this. A recent study with Scandinavian women showed lower rates of use, under 10%, so we should include this in future programs to make students aware that this is not a contraceptive [34].

Most people aged between 20 and 24 years showed reasonable knowledge about contraception and STI, although these results are improved with age using a consistent method and taking less risks, specifically for females. We observed a general banalization of STI, young people think that are not frequent in our society, despite statistics showing they have been increasing in the last years [5, 6]. This is a topic that should be covered deeply in sexual education for young people at university.

Nearly 65.3% of the respondents in this survey reported having received school- based sexual education before enrolling at University. Students with higher sexual and reproductive health knowledge were those that attended some kind of intervention during High School and used a consistent contraceptive method. As in other studies, young people that attended a school based sex program were more likely to use an effective contraceptive method after 12 months intervention [33, 35].

Not only knowledge protects against STIs. Lopez et al. [33] found that students that attended sexual education programs used condom and some hormonal method more frequently. It is necessary to continue young people’s awareness at university as well. Some of them received information at school and despite that, adopt risk conducts. A continuing emphasis on giving information about sexuality and contraceptives is crucial for the promotion of a healthy sex life including the correct use of contraceptives and healthy sexual behaviors emphasizing on STI and its current prevalence.

The most common sources of information regarding sexual health and contraception were friends, television and health providers. Similar findings were found in another study with 1900 young people, females were more likely to obtain contraceptive information from health care professionals, whereas males were more likely to report friends, partners, internet and television/radio [36]. However, we do not assess whether knowledge and/or information had a positive impact on behaviors. We observed that those that were more informed had healthier lifestyle, but we cannot state that this behavior is due to previous education. Studies carried out in other countries that evaluated sources of information about contraceptives found that a high knowledge from sources was not enough to result in actual use [37].

In Spain where this study was conducted, there is still a lack of an evaluation system of health education programs. A study carried out by Lima et al. and Morales et al. concluded that adolescents and young people who received sexual education had similar conducts to those that did not [2, 20]. More studies that assess the impact of these programs on young conducts are needed. Regarding this, with the results of this survey we propose to continue teaching sexual education at university since students continue showing risk behaviors and lack of knowledge.

Strengths and limitations of the study

We may consider some limitations in this research. First, due to nature of questions, information bias could be provided by students and this may affect reliability of the results due to social desirability. Second, we cannot establish a cause and effect relationship due to this being a cross-sectional design. This study was conducted in one university, the results are therefore not necessarily generalizable to other universities in Spain.

A small proportion of students declined to answer, but even so, we do not know their reasons to do so.

As a strength, this study provides information about university students and their sexual and contraceptive attitudes to design education programs on sexuality and reproductive issues.

In the future, it would be interesting to explore what strategies are successful in reducing risk behaviors.

Conclusions

This study showed that there are factors that contribute to having a healthier behavior on sexuality and contraception: older students, women and students of health sciences career showed a healthier behavior in sexuality and a higher level of knowledge. Those who had received some education about sexuality and contraception showed greater knowledge and less risky behavior. However, we observed this is not enough and should be improved by education, also at University stages, in order to avoid students taking risks. Specially, education must be focused on sexually transmitted infections and the correct use of contraceptives.

It is necessary to continue programing reproductive health programs at university to improve sexual and reproductive attitudes among university students and assess the impact that they have on their lifestyles.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the University of Seville for the support to this study. All study participants for responding to our questionnaire.

Funding

This work has not been funded.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors´ contributions

FLL & JMS developed the survey and designed the study. FLL performed the data analysis and wrote the first draft of manuscript. JMS supervised the analysis and the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from ethical review board of University of Seville. Informed written consent was obtained from study participants after explaining the objective of the study.

Consent for publication

It is not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain

References

  1. Glasier A, Gülmezoglu A, Schmid G, Moreno C, Van Look P. Sexual and reproductive health: a matter of life and death. Lancet. 2006;368(9547):1595–607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Morales A, Espada J, Orgilés M. Mediation of an efficacious HIV risk reduction intervention for adolescents: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. J Health Psychol. 2017;:135910531770725.Google Scholar
  3. Calatrava M, López-Del Burgo C, de Irala J. Factores de riesgo relacionados con la salud sexual en los jóvenes europeos. Med Clin. 2012;138(12):534–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Adolescents and Young Adults | Prevention | STDs | CDC [Internet]. Cdc.gov. 2017 [cited 5 September 2017]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/life-stages-populations/adolescents-youngadults.htm
  5. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2017 [cited 17 September 2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en/.
  6. Pérez-Morente MÁ, Cano-Romero E, Sánchez-Ocón MT, Castro-López E, Jiménez-Bautista F, Hueso-Montoro C. Sexuality risk factors among people with suspect of sexually transmitted disease. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2017 Jan 25;91. Pii: e201701012. Spanish.Google Scholar
  7. Díaz-Franco A, Noguer-Zambrano I, Cano-Portero R. Vigilancia epidemiológica de las infecciones de transmisión sexual. España, 1995-2003. Med Clin. 2005;125(14):529–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Dick B, Ferguson J y Ross DA. Introduction and rationale. En: Ross DA, dick B y Ferguson J, editores. Preventing HIV/AIDS in young people. A systematic review of the evidence from developing countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Kirby D, Laris B, Rolleri L. Sex and HIV education programs: their impact on sexual behaviors of young people throughout the world. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40(3):206–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Parker R, Wellings K, Lazarus J. Sexuality education in Europe: an overview of current policies. Sex Education. 2009;9(3):227–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirby D, Coyle K, Rolleri L, Alton F, Robin L. Reducing adolescent sexual risk: a theoretical guide for developing and adapting curriculum-based programs. ETR Associates: California; 2011.Google Scholar
  12. Morales A, Espada JP, Orgilés M. A 1-year follow-up evaluation of a sexual-health education program for Spanish adolescents compared with a well-established program. Eur J Pub Health. 2016;26(1):35–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bermúdez MP, Teva Alvarez I, Ramiro MT, Uribe-Rodríguez AF, Sierra JC, Buela-Casal G. Knowledge, misconceptions, self-efficacy and attitudes regarding HIV: cross-cultural assessment and analysis in adolescents. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2012;12:235–49.Google Scholar
  14. Oringanje C, Meremikwu M, Eko H, Esu E, Meremikwu A, Ehiri J. Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016.Google Scholar
  15. Espada J, Escribano S, Morales A, Orgilés M. Two-year follow-up of a sexual health promotion program for Spanish adolescents. Eval Health Professions. 2016;40(4):483–504.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Reis M, Ramiro L, Gaspar Matos M, Alves DJ. Nationwide survey of contraceptive and sexually transmitted infection knowledge, attitudes and skills of university students in Portugal. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2013;13(2):127–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher J, Fisher W, Bryan A, Misovich S. Information-motivation-behavioral skills model-based HIV risk behavior change intervention for inner-city high school youth. 2002. Comprobar si es 2002 o 2012.Google Scholar
  18. Reis M, Ramiro L, Matos M, Diniz J. The effects of sex education in promoting sexual and reproductive health in Portuguese university students. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2011;29:477–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Evaluación del programa “Forma Joven”. Seville: Consejería de educación. Agencia Andaluza de Evaluación Educativa. Junta de Andalucía; 2015.Google Scholar
  20. Lima Serrano M, Neves de Jesus S, Lima Rodríguez J. Actitudes de adolescentes hacia la salud: evaluación de un programa escolar de promoción de la salud en Sevilla, España. Salud Colectiva. 2012;8(1):47–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wanje G, Masese L, Avuvika E, Baghazal A, Omoni G, Scott McClelland R. Parents’ and teachers’ views on sexual health education and screening for sexually transmitted infections among in-school adolescent girls in Kenya: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2017;14:95. doi:10.1186/s12978-017-0360-z.
  22. Baku EA, Agbemafle I, Adanu RMK. Effects of parents training on parents' knowledge and attitudes about adolescent sexuality in Accra Metropolis, Ghana. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):101. doi:10.1186/s12978-017-0363-9.
  23. Rodríguez-Carrión J, Traverso Blanco CI. Conductas sexuales en adolescentes de 12 a 17 años de Andalucía. Gac Sanit. 2012;26:519–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Estudio Poblacional sobre el Uso y la Opinión de los métodos anticonceptivos en España Encuesta de anticoncepción en España, 2016. Madrid: Sociedad Española de Contracepción (SEC); 2016.Google Scholar
  25. Reis M, Matos MG. Knowledge and attitude towards contraceptive methods and STIs among youngsters. Revista Lusófona de Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde. 2007;4:23–35.Google Scholar
  26. Smith A, Lyons A, Ferris J, Richters J, Pitts M, Shelley J, Simpson JM. Sexual and relationship satisfaction among heterosexual men and women: the importance of desired frequency of sex. J Sex Marital Ther. 2011;37(2):104–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong E, Kang Y. Gender differences in sexual behaviors in Korean adolescents. J Pediatr Nurs. 2017;Google Scholar
  28. Edelman N, Cassell JA, de Visser R, Prah P, Mercer CH. Can psychosocial and socio-demographic questions help identify sexual risk among heterosexually-active women of reproductive age? Evidence from Britain's third National Survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles (Natsal-3). BMC Public Health. 2017;4:17(1).Google Scholar
  29. Gillman AS, Yeater EA, Feldstein Ewing SW, Kong AS, Bryan AD. Risky sex in high-risk adolescents: associations with alcohol use, marijuana use, and co-occurring use. AIDS Behav. 2017; doi:10.1007/s10461-017-1900-9.
  30. Brown J, Vanable P. Alcohol use, partner type, and risky sexual behavior among college students: findings from an event-level study. Addict Behav. 2007;32(12):2940–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Contraceptive non-use and associated factors among university students in 22 countries. Afr Health Sci. 2015;15(4):1056–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Huber LR, Ersek JL. Contraceptive use among sexually active university students. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(7):1063–70. doi:10.1089/jwh.2008.1131.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopez L, Bernholc A, Chen M, Tolley E. School-based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016.Google Scholar
  34. Guleria S, Juul KE, Munk C, Hansen BT, Arnheim-Dahlström L, Liaw KL, Nygård M, Kjaer SK. Contraceptive non-use and emergency contraceptive use at first sexual intercourse among nearly 12 000 Scandinavian women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(3):286–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mmbaga EJ, Kajula L, Aarø LE, et al. Effect of the PREPARE intervention on sexual initiation and condom use among adolescents aged 12–14: a cluster randomised controlled trial in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:322. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4245-4.
  36. Khurana A, Bleakley A. Young adults’ sources of contraceptive information: variations based on demographic characteristics and sexual risk behaviors. Contraception. 2015;91(2):157–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenjisa JL, Ulfina D, Tamme E, Kaba G, Berehe H, et al. Knowledge and practice of emergency contraceptives among students at Ambo Techniques College, Ethiopia. Reprod Syst Sex Disord. 2014;3:136. doi:10.4172/2161-038X.1000136.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement