Skip to main content

Leveraging mobile health applications to improve sexual and reproductive health services in Nigeria: implications for practice and policy

Background

Universal access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is crucial for human well-being and is essential to achieve the sustainable development goals (SDG’s) [1]. SRH remains a major healthcare challenge facing Nigeria with evidence of marked inequities in access to SRH services that highlight a wide gap between rich and poor [2]. Nigeria, with an estimated population of 203 million, is the seventh-most populous country in the world [3] and has the fastest growing mobile market on the African continent [4]. Mobile phone subscription in Nigeria reached 180 million in October 2019 with phone penetration (tele density) being as high as 94.5% [5]. Smart phone usage in Nigeria is currently estimated at 40 million and is projected to rise to 140 million by 2025 [6]. The increasing penetration and use of mobile phones in developing country settings such as Nigeria has led to greater utilization of mobile health (mHealth) which involves the incorporation of mobile phones, tablets and other wireless devices to support the achievement of health objectives [7]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), mHealth has the potential to transform how people access health services and achieve higher standard of health and well-being [8].

Evidence from other settings suggest that mHealth can be used to bridge the gaps of distance and expertise and support SRH services such as antiretroviral adherence [9], the prevention of sexually transmitted infections [10, 11] and perinatal and postnatal care [12]. Despite the growing body of evidence to support the use of mHealth to provide SRH, implementation of these mHealth solutions remains surprisingly low in developing countries [13]. With high mobile phone penetration in Nigeria, the adoption of mHealth to transform SRH services appears to be low-hanging fruit that should be fully exploited.

The fragile state of SRH in Nigeria

While progress has been recorded with promoting SRH services in Nigeria and reducing maternal mortality rates, the country accounts for nearly 20% of all global maternal deaths [14] with an estimated maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 917 deaths per 100,000 live births (uncertainty interval 80%: 658–1320). Between 2005 and 2015, over 600,000 maternal deaths are estimated to have occurred in Nigeria with the lifetime risk of dying during pregnancy, childbirth or postpartum/post-abortion being put at 1 in 22 [14]. These unacceptably high rates are a reflection of inequities in access to health services with poor women in remote areas being the least likely to access reproductive healthcare services [7]. In 2020, over 10 million pregnancies are projected to have occurred in Nigeria with 65% of these estimated to have happened in rural (and mostly hard-to reach) areas [15]. Low numbers of skilled birth attendants, especially in remote areas, have resulted in many unsafe births in Nigeria. Between 2006–2014, it is projected that just 43% of births in Nigeria were attended by skilled birth attendants [15].

With a life expectancy of 55 years, Nigeria’s population is a very youthful one with approximately 31.9% of the population falling within the 12–24-year age bracket. The contraceptive prevalence rate among Nigerian women aged 15–49 is estimated to be 17% with an unmet need for family planning rate of 15%, this is against the backdrop of a high total fertility rate of 5.2% per woman [15]. A high prevalence of child marriage exists in Nigeria as approximately 43% of girls are married by age 18 with higher rates of sexually transmitted infections (such as HIV) and complications during pregnancy and childbirth occurring in this age group [15]. Married girls appear to be further disadvantaged as only 2% percent of 15–19-year-old married girls are projected to be in school and receiving an education [16]. More so, female genital mutilation prevalence among girls aged 15–19 in Nigeria is estimated to be 14%.

The SRH coverage rates in Nigeria are typically low, especially in the rural (and hard-to-reach) areas and among adolescents [17, 18]. Some of the identified barriers to accessing SRH services include inadequate knowledge about the services, inconvenient health facility opening hours, remoteness of facilities, financial constraints as well as community and religious norms [19]. Wider systemic issues also impact negatively on the SRH system in Nigeria. Healthcare financing in Nigeria is grossly inadequate and contributes greatly to the fragility of the health system. Since the Abuja declaration of 2001 that saw leaders of African countries pledge to commit at least 15% of their annual budgets to the health sector, Nigeria has never voted more than 6% of its annual budget to the health sector. To further compound this situation, household out-of-pocket expenditure remains by far the largest source of health expenditure as less than 5% of Nigerians are covered by the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) [20]. This has probably led to highly convoluted patterns of care-seeking.

Emergence of a digital technology culture: transforming traditional healthcare

mHealth is the first component of electronic health (eHealth); eHealth refers to use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for health and health-related fields which reaches hard-to-access areas [21]. The last few decades have recorded a steady rise in the utilization of eHealth to strengthen health systems. In 2005, The World Health Assembly urged member states to consider developing and implementing eHealth to promote equitable and affordable health access for their citizens [22]. In 2013, the World Health Assembly adopted a resolution on eHealth standardization and member countries were encouraged to establish a national eHealth strategy [22]. In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly on Information Society declared that widespread adoption of eHealth could facilitate the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2030 [23]. In 2019, the WHO released its first guidelines on eHealth interventions. Despite the efforts of international organizations to promote eHealth, Africa appears to be lagging behind in the adoption of this valuable resource to strengthen its health services.

With technological innovations becoming increasingly inseparable from healthcare, there are concerns of an imminent paradigm shift involving patients (who now have greater access to unregulated technological solutions to deal with their health conditions) and health workers operating within inflexible health systems that have failed to catch up with the rapid progress of the medical technology industry [24].

The advances within the medical technology industry do not appear to be matched by changes within the medical curriculum or policies and guidelines behind medical care with potential negative impacts on quality of care [25]. Strict regulations within healthcare systems; hesitation among stakeholders in healthcare to implement change; cultural and human factors are some identified reasons for the slow transition of health systems to eHealth. This is occurring in the setting of increasing costs of caring for people with chronic conditions and imminent health worker shortages globally. Expanded access to electronic medical information has given rise to empowered “e-patients” who take active part in decision making about their own health and disease management [26]. This has resulted in a shift from the patriarchal hierarchy of traditional medicine where health workers were responsible for making medical decisions with minimal input from patients to an equal level partnership between patients and professionals [27]. In proposing the use of mHealth to deliver SRH services in developing country settings such as Nigeria, a model that reflects this shift from the old paradigm of the paternalistic model of medicine is desirable.

Emerging evidence has linked the perennial problems of rapid population growth, high birth rates and dismal rates of maternal mortality and HIV/AIDS in the sub-Saharan Africa with a distinct pattern of sexual behavior among adolescents. In spite of a growing commitment by national and international actors to address this peculiar issue, several political, economic, cultural and religious barriers have limited progress on this front [28]. Understanding the nuances that exist in adolescent SRH in sub-Saharan Africa will be key to designing appropriate and effective mHealth interventions for SRH in the region.

Utility of mHealth in improving SRH services

Advances in mHealth have promoted their use in SRH service delivery. mHealth has been utilized to send personal reminders to patients via e-mail, automated phone calls, or text messages to remind them to take their medications or visit the health facility [29]. Text message and telephone reminders have been successfully used to gather health‐related information from pregnant women [30], to increase access to family planning information [31], to facilitate the presence of skilled birth attendants during labour [32], and to enhance prenatal and postnatal care [12]. A recent systematic review revealed that an SMS-reminder intervention improved medical compliance (e.g., taking medication at a scheduled time, completing non-medication follow-up treatment) in 85% (83/97) of the studies considered [33]. The effectiveness of SMS use for SRH services has been associated with the women's digital literacy levels and their knowledge of the local language in text [34].

Mobile gadgets have caused a shift in the practice of medicine from the traditional doctor-patient meeting to electronic-aided communication and procedures. Consultation by telephone helps to reduce waiting times in consultation rooms, increase frequency of contact, enhance communication between caregiver and patients thereby building confidence and rapport, reduce visits to emergency room and reduce travel time and transportation cost [35, 36]. The utility of mobile consultations on telephone or via platforms such a Microsoft Teams, Zoom and Webex is further underscored by the current COVID-19 pandemic where social distancing measures are critical to reducing the spread of virus in clinical settings. These social media platforms are acceptable to a majority of the younger generation who form the bulk of clients requiring SRH services and should be exploited for this purpose.

In Morocco, the effectiveness of portable ultrasound machines and 3G smartphones in improving diagnostic times for expectant mothers in rural clinics has been clearly demonstrated. These devices were wirelessly linked to reproductive health specialists in urban hospitals [37]. Smartphone connected electrocardiograms (ECG) are now a reality and smartphones have been successfully used to monitor heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and blood pressure [38].

mHealth has been used to train SRH e healthcare workers in remote settings and provide them access to accurate and current clinical information which they could review at their convenience on their mobile devices. Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness and feasibility of using mHealth to train frontline health workers in rural settings within Nigeria [39]. Patients have also been empowered by providing them with accurate and readily available information on SRH on their mobile devices. mHealth has been shown to improve healthcare worker productivity in several ways: (1) reducing unproductive travel time, (2) enabling faster decision-making by improving knowledge and care giving skills, (3) improving communications, (4) promoting rapid response to medical test results that are transmitted directly to mobile phones, (5) improving data management and record-keeping practices, (6) reducing  medication errors, (7) enhancing overall professional efficiency and work patterns [29, 40, 41]. These benefits could be extended to healthcare workers in SRH upon adoption of mHealth approaches.

Applicability of mHealth to the Nigerian context: implications for practice and policy

Is mHealth really suitable for the Nigerian health system? A recent survey conducted by InStrat Global Health Solutions in 339 health facilities across Nigeria (with representative geographic coverage of Nigeria) revealed that there was an average of 7 phones per facility of which 5 were smart phones capable of supporting most health technology applications [42]. This supports the projections of high mobile telephone penetration in Nigeria and lends plausibility to the theory that mHealth can be used to strengthen SRH services in Nigeria and indeed other similar contexts. Local examples of the utility of mHealth in improving SRH services exist. Ondo State Nigeria had the highest MMR in the southwest region of 775 per 100,000 live births in 2008 [43]; up to 90% of these deaths were attributed to the activities of untrained birth attendants. An electronic tablet-based training intervention by InStrat GHS consisting of short films (in both English and Yoruba) interspersed with quizzes on maternal care, basic emergency obstetric and newborn care resulted in a 32% improvement in the test scores of the 200 health workers trained [44].

The huge challenges posed by the unmet SRH needs of Nigerians call  for the full-scale adoption of an innovative and cost-effective measure such as mHealth. Technological and policy changes will be required to adapt mHealth to suit the Nigerian SRH context. Mobile phones are a useful tool for generating self-entered and automatically captured data on SRH but centralized databases will need to be created instead of isolated systems [45, 46]. Coordination will be required to synchronize the development of software on SRH to guarantee functionality on different operating systems [47]. Funding will need to be secured to cover initial software development, routine system troubleshooting and ongoing costs of internet and mobile network for health workers. mHealth remains an affordable solution as the only requirement from the participants is a mobile phone. The provision of toll-free hotlines for SRH has found to be beneficial in sub-Saharan settings and should be explored within the Nigerian context. Extensive training and supportive supervision are crucial; cultural and language adaptation are vital as demonstrated in the successful maternal care training that was conducted in Ogun State. Data security is a key consideration as electronic systems are vulnerable to hacking and data theft. Mitigation measures should be put in place to protect electronic patient records and sensitive information. Electronic files should be backed up to reduce loss in case of fire or other physical disasters [48].

mHealth holds great promise for revolutionizing the delivery of SRH services within Nigeria and similar contexts. To realize the full potential of mHealth, stakeholders will be required to carefully address the potential drawbacks to its full-scale deployment.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ICTs:

Information and Communication Technologies

mHealth:

Mobile Health

SDGs:

Sustainable Development Goals

SRH:

Sexual and Reproductive Health

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Temmerman M, Khosla R, Say L. Sexual and reproductive health and rights: a global development, health, and human rights priority. Lancet. 2014;384(9941):e30–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61190-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. Maternal health in Nigeria: generating information for action. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/maternal-health-nigeria/en/. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  3. 3.

    Nigeria Population. Worldometers. 2019. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/nigeria-population/. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  4. 4.

    Onyeajuwa MK. Institutions and consumers: Assertion of ordinary consumer interest in the Nigerian digital mobile telecommunications market. Telecommun Policy. 2017;41:642–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Industry Statistics. https://www.ncc.gov.ng/stakeholder/statistics-reports/industry-overview#view-graphs-tables. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

  6. 6.

    Smartphone users in Nigeria 2014–2025. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/467187/forecast-of-smartphone-users-in-nigeria/. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

  7. 7.

    Sondaal SFV, Browne JL, Amoakoh-Coleman M, Borgstein A, Miltenburg AS, Verwijs M, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Assessing the effect of mHealth interventions in improving maternal and neonatal care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0154664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    World Health Organization. WHO releases first guideline on digital health interventions. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/17-04-2019-who-releases-first-guideline-on-digital-health-interventions. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

  9. 9.

    Sidney K, Antony J, Rodrigues R, Arumugam K, Krishnamurthy S, Dsouza G, et al. Supporting patient adherence to antiretrovirals using mobile phone reminders: patient responses from South India. AIDS Care. 2012;24(5):612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Perry RC, Kayekjian KC, Braun RA, Cantu M, Sheoran B, Chung PJ. Adolescents’ perspectives on the use of a text messaging service for preventive sexual health promotion. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(3):220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gold J, Lim MS, Hocking JS, Keogh LA, Spelman T, Hellard ME. Determining the impact of text messaging for sexual health promotion to young people. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(4):247.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cormick G, Kim NA, Rodgers A, Gibbons L, Buekens PM, Belizán JM, et al. Interest of pregnant women in the use of SMS (short message service) text messages for the improvement of perinatal and postnatal care. Reproductive Health. 2012;9:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kenny G, O’Connor Y, Eze E, Ndibuagu E, Heavin C. A Ground-Up Approach to mHealth in Nigeria: A Study of Primary Healthcare Workers’ Attitude to mHealth Adoption. Procedia Computer Science. 2017;121:809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    World Health Organization. Maternal health in Nigeria: generating information for action. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/maternal-health-nigeria/en/. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

  15. 15.

    United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). World population dashboard – Nigeria. https://www.unfpa.org/data/world-population/NG. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  16. 16.

    National Population Commission-NPC/Nigeria. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 1999. Calverton: NPC/Nigeria and ORC/Macro; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Denno DM, Hoopes AJ, Chandra-Mouli V. Effective strategies to provide adolescent sexual and reproductive health services and increase demand and community support. J Adolesc Health. 2015. http://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X(14)00424-8/abstract

  18. 18.

    Animasahun V, Sholeye O, Oduwole A. Promoting the sexual and reproductive health of adolescent females in Ijebu-Ode, southwest, Nigeria: a study of sexual risk-taking. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2016;29(6):20160021. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2016-0021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nmadu AG, Mohammed S, Usman NO. Barriers to adolescents’ access and utilization of reproductive health services in a community in north-western Nigeria: a qualitative exploratory study in primary care. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sustainability of state health insurance schemes in Nigeria beyond the launch. https://www.pwc.com/ng/en/assets/pdf/sustainability-state-health-insurance-nigeria.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

  21. 21.

    World Health Organization. Digital health in TB care and control: Key definitions. WHO. http://www.who.int/tb/areas-of-work/digital-health/definitions/en/. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

  22. 22.

    World Health Organization. Digital health. https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/digital-health. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  23. 23.

    General Assembly of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/ga/70/resolutions.shtml. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  24. 24.

    Meskó B, Drobni Z, Bényei É, Gergely B, Győrffy Z. Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. Mhealth. 2017;3:38. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.07.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Topol E. The Creative Destruction of Medicine: How the Digital Revolution Will Create Better Health Care. Basic Books, 2013.

  26. 26.

    Ferguson T. Doc Tom. http://www.doctom.com/. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  27. 27.

    TEDx Maastricht-Bas Bloem. From God to Guide. 2011. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnDWt10Maf8. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  28. 28.

    Okonofua F. Promoting youth sexual and reproductive health in Africa: the need for a paradigm shift. Afr J Reprod Health. 2012;16(2):9–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    West DM. Using mobile technology to improve maternal health and fight Ebola: A case study of mobile innovation in Nigeria. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CTINigeria.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  30. 30.

    Van Heerden A, Norris S, Tollman S, Richter L, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Collecting maternal health information from HIV-positive pregnant women using mobile phone-assisted face-to-face interviews in Southern Africa. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e116. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Corker J. “Ligne Verte” toll-free hotline: Using cell phones to increase access to family planning information in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Cases Public Health Commun Market. 2010;4:23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lund S, Hemed M, Nielsen BB, Said A, Said K, Makungu MH, Rasch V. Mobile phones as a health communication tool to improve skilled attendance at delivery in Zanzibar: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. BJOG Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2012;119(10):1256–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03413.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Schwebel FS, Larimer ME. Using text message reminders in health care services: a narrative literature review Internet Interventions 2018; 13: 82–104. Reproduc Health. 2012;9(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-9-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rana S. Mobile phones for reproductive health care information: reviewing mobile health (mhealth) from gender. Perspective in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Gender Studies Centre for Gender Studies University of Oslo (UiO) Blindern, Norway, 2017. http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-63039. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  35. 35.

    Weiner JP. Doctor-patient communication in the e-health era. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012;1:33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Peleg R, Nazarenko E. Providing cell phone numbers and e-mail addresses to patients: The patient’s perspective, a cross sectional study. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012;1:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nuber D, Nordgren A. “Mobile Ultrasound Patrol Project,” Also see Dan Verel. “Mobile Ultrasound Patrol Cut Scan Cost from $80 to $2 for Morocco Moms,” Med City News; 2014.

  38. 38.

    Nemcova A, et al. Monitoring of heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and blood pressure using a smartphone. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;59:101928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Otu A, Ebenso B, Okuzu O. Osifo-Dawodu E. Using a mHealth tutorial application to change knowledge and attitude of frontline health workers to Ebola virus disease in Nigeria: a before-and-after study. Hum Resour Health 2016; 4, 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0100-4

  40. 40.

    Entner R. The Wireless Industry: The Essential Engine of U.S. Economic Growth. Recon Analytics 2012; pp. 30–33.

  41. 41.

    Prgomet M, Georgiou A, Westbrook J. The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians’ work practices and patient care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(6):792–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    InStrat Global Health Solutions. Penetration of mobile phones in Nigerian health facilities. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/instrat-global-health-solutions-7aa080136_penetration-of-mobile-phones-in-nigeria-health-activity-6709917610458284032-z-Kp. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  43. 43.

    Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2008 [FR222] (dhsprogram.com).

  44. 44.

    Anadach Group. A report of the maternal and neonatal health video training pilot project in Ondo State, Nigeria. 2017.

  45. 45.

    Across Health. How mHealth will fundamentally transform the Pharma-Patient-HCP triangle. 2012. http://across.com/health/downloads/120420%20webinar%20v3_Across%20Health_Fonny%20Schenck_Prese ntation%201.pdf

  46. 46.

    Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process. 1991;50:179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH). eHealth, mHealth, reproductive health. Outlook, 29:1. https://path.azureedge.net/media/documents/RH_outlook_29_1.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

  48. 48.

    World Bank. Information and Communications for Development 2012: Maximizing Mobile. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2012: 45‒58. http://www.worldbank.org/ict/IC4D2012. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AO and SY conceived and drafted the manuscript. IU and OO critically reviewed the manuscript. SY had final responsibility to submit. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanni Yaya.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Sanni Yaya is Editor-in-chief of Reproductive Health.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otu, A., Ukpeh, I., Okuzu, O. et al. Leveraging mobile health applications to improve sexual and reproductive health services in Nigeria: implications for practice and policy. Reprod Health 18, 21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01069-z

Download citation