Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of slightly elevated progesterone on hCG trigger day on clinical pregnancy rate in GnRH-ant IVF/ICSI cycles

Reproductive Health volume 19, Article number: 66 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

It was been agreed that significantly elevated progesterone level on the hCG trigger day have detrimental effect on clinical outcomes in IVF/ICSI cycles. However, few studies explored whether slightly elevated progesterone level also same impact on clinical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively studies the effect of slightly elevated progesterone level on outcomes of IVF/ICSI in GnRH-ant cycles. Propensity score matching was used to confounding variables. The women were divided into two groups according to the progesterone level: Group 1: < 1.0 ng/ml; Group 2: 1.0 ng/ml–1.5 ng/ml. Then compare the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) between the two groups.

Result

A total of 847 IVF/ICSI cycles were included in the present study. The average CPR per transfer cycle was 51.7%. CPR of group 1 was 55.22%, significantly higher than that of group 2 (40.66%, P = 0.013). Progesterone level on the day of hCG injection was further evaluated at threshold increments of 0.1 ng/ml, and the CPR was decreased dramatically once the progesterone level higher than 1.4 ng/ml.

Conclusion

The slight elevation progesterone level on the hCG trigger day may have a negative effect on the clinical pregnancy in GnRH-ant cycles. In the case of progesterone > 1.4 ng/ml on the hCG injection day, freeze-all strategy was recommended.

Summary

The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of slightly elevated progesterone (1.0 ng/ml ~ 1.5 ng/ml) on outcomes of IVF/ICSI in GnRH-ant cycles. Slightly elevated progesterone level leaded to significant lower clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) that that of group with normal progesterone level (40.66% vs. 55.22%, P = 0.013). The CPR was decreased dramatically once the progesterone level higher than 1.4 ng/ml. So slightly elevated progesterone level on the trigger day may have a negative effect on the clinical pregnancy in GnRH-ant cycles. In the case of progesterone > 1.4 ng/ml on the hCG injection day, freeze-all strategy was recommended.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

In the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COS) cycles, elevated serum progesterone level is observed in some cases, particularly at the end of stimulation cycle [1]. The incidence of elevated P level was reported as 12.8%–38% in GnRH antagonist cycles [2, 3].

At present, there is no uniform standard for the definition of elevated progesterone levels on hCG trigger day. Most of studies believed that clinical pregnancy rate were reduced when progesterone level > 1.5 ng/ml [4,5,6,7], and several studies considered the progesterone > 0.9 ng/ml[8], 1.2 ng/ml[9], even 1.75 ng/ml[10], 2.0 ng/ml[11] as elevated progesterone level. Although the threshold of elevated progesterone level was not consensus, almost all studies found that the significantly elevated progesterone level (P > 1.5 ng/ml) on the hCG trigger day have detrimental effect on clinical outcomes.

What is the relationship between a slight increase in progesterone level of 1.0–1.5 ng/on trigger day and the clinical outcomes? Few studies explored this question. If 1.5 ng/ml > progesterone > 1.0 ng/ml has an adverse effect on the pregnancy outcome, fresh embryo transfer should be cancelled; if there is no adverse effect, the freeze-all strategy would prolong the time of TTB and increase the burden on the patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore whether slightly elevated progesterone level on the trigger day with 1.0–1.5 ng/ml has an adverse effect on clinical pregnancy in GnRH-ant protocol cycles.

Material and methods

Study population and design

The present study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China. The study was based on the Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 1983. A retrospective, single-center cohort study was performed in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University.

Women undergoing fresh IVF/ICSI-ET with GnRH-ant protocol between January of 2020 and April of 2021 were included in the present study. The inclusion criteria including: (1) 20–40 years old; (2) COS with GnRH-ant protocol; (3) progesterone level was ≤ 1.5 ng/ml on the day of HCG injection. Exclusion criteria including: (1) endometrial polyp; (2) uterine anomaly; (3) donor oocytes or cryopreserved embryos. The basic characteristics were recorded, such as the female age, infertile duration, BMI, COS days, AMH, the E2 and LH level on trigger day, the number of oocytes retrieved, endometrial thickness (EMT).

The present study involved 847 women, and were divided into two groups according to the progesterone level: Group 1: < 1.0 ng/ml (n = 756); Group 2: 1.0 ng/ml–1.5 ng/ml (n = 91). To make the two groups comparable, the propensity scoring matching method was used and women with progesterone < 1.0 ng/ml (n = 364) were matched in a 4:1 ratio to women with progesterone 1.0 ng/ml–1.5 ng/ml (n = 91).

Ovulation Induction and IVF-ET Procedures

Infertile women used GnRH-ant protocol. Gn (FSH) were given on the third day of menstruation, and the dosage of Gn (FSH) ranged from 150 to 300 IU, according to the women age, AMH, and the number of total antral follicle. The dose was adjusted based on the ovarian response to Gn. When the dominant follicle ≥ 14 mm, E2 ≥ 400 pg/ml, GnRH-ant (Cetrorelix) 0.25 mg was added daily.

Oocytes were triggered with 6000 IU–10000 IU of hCG when the largest two follicles ≥ 18 mm. Oocytes were retrieved 36 h after hCG injection, and followed by conventional IVF/ICSI. Three days after oocyte retrieval, ≤ 2 high-quality embryos were transferred. Vaginal micronized progesterone 0.6 g and oral micronized progesterone 0.2 g were given as luteal phase support, and last for 60 days. The presence of a gestational sac via ultrasound 4–5 weeks after embryo transfer was defined as clinical pregnancy.

P assessment immunoassay

The electrochemical luminescence was used to test the progesterone levels on the day of hCG injection, with the measured sensitivity and total imprecision of 0.03 ng/ml and < 5%, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data were recorded as Mean ± SD, and the student’s t-test were selected to conduct the statistics. Categorical data was reported as numbers and the Chi-Square test was used to compare the percentage. The women recruited in the present study were divided into 2 groups according to the level of progesterone on the hCG injection day. SPSS16.0 (SPSS Inc, USA) was implied to carry out the statistical analysis, and the difference was considered to be significance when the P < 0.05.

Results

A total of 847 IVF/ICSI cycles were included in the present study. The average clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per transfer cycle was 51.7%. The average progesterone level on the day of hCG injection was 0.57 ng/ml with a SD 0.28 ng/ml. Other demographic data, such as age, infertile duration, BMI, COS days, AMH, E2 level, LH level on the day of hCG injection, the number of oocyte retrieved were summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of study group (n = 847)
Full size table

As shown in Table 2, EMT, E2 level on the day of hCG injection, number of oocyte retrieved, and clinical pregnancy rate were different between Group 1 and Group 2 (Table 2). Nonetheless, our analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the female age, duration of infertility, BMI, length of stimulation, total dose of Gn, LH on the hCG day between the Group 1 and the Group 2.

Table 2 Characteristics of group 1 (P < 1.0) and group 2 (1.0 < P < 1.5)
Full size table

Progesterone level on the day of hCG injection was further evaluated at threshold increments of 0.1 ng/ml to assess its discriminatory ability for clinical pregnancy. Slightly elevated progesterone level leaded to significant lower clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) that that of group with normal progesterone level (40.66% vs. 55.22%, P = 0.013). The CPR was decreased dramatically once the progesterone level higher than 1.4 ng/ml (Table 3).

Table 3 clinical outcome according to P level on the day of hCG injection
Full size table

Discussion

So far, many studies have evaluated the effect of elevated progesterone level on the trigger day on the clinical outcomes after IVF/ICSI cycles [11,12,13,14]. But few studies analysed whether slight elevation of progesterone level (1.0–1.5 ng/ml) has detrimental effect on the outcomes, especially in GnRH-ant protocol. To the best of our knowledge, the present study assessed the clinical outcomes between slight elevation progesterone level 1.0–1.5 ng/ml with normal progesterone level < 1.0 ng/ml in GnRH-ant protocol cycles for the first time.

In the present study, we found that the clinical pregnancy rate was decreased significantly even with slight elevation progesterone level with 1.0–1.5 ng/ml. In order to assess its discriminatory ability for clinical outcome, the progesterone level was further evaluated at threshold increments of 0.1 ng/ml. The results showed that the clinical pregnancy rate was decreased dramatically when the progesterone level > 1.4 ng/ml.

It was established that serum progesterone elevation on the trigger day has a negative impact on clinical pregnancy outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles [7, 15, 16], regardless of the development stage of the transferred embryos [10] and trigger with GnRH-a or hCG [11]. The elevation progesterone level ranges from 0.8 to 2.0 ng/ml, according to ovarian response and ovary stimulation protocol [17, 18]. Most studies have suggested that serum progesterone level > 1.5 ng/ml would be consider as premature progesterone elevation and fresh embryo transfer should be cancelled [19].

Although most clinicians think progesterone level < 1.5 ng/ml have no negative effect on outcomes, one study demonstrated that possible deleterious effects may occur when progesterone level < 1.5 ng/ml [10]. Similarly, we found that the clinical pregnancy outcome was poor when the serum progesterone level 1.0 to 1.5 ng/ml in GnRH-ant protocol.

In controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles, multifollicular growth leads to increased ovarian steroidogenic activity and the progesterone elevation might be linked to this mechanism [20, 21]. One study showed that the serum progesterone level on triggering day was closely related to the serum estradiol level, the number of follicles, the number of retrieved oocytes, and ovarian sensitivity. The women’s age, BMI, AFC, and basal FSH, basal E2 were not associated with serum progesterone level on triggering day [22]. Therefore, to avoid elevated progesterone level, milder stimulation approach was recommended to produce fewer oocytes in the following cycles [23].

Increasing number of studies used other indicators, such as progesterone hCG/progesteronebasal [24], P/E2 [19, 25, 26], progesterone /follicle [19], progesterone /mature oocytes [27], to predict pregnancy outcome. However, the serum elevated progesterone level would induce endometrial transformation, weaken the endometrium receptivity [28], and cause the asynchrony between the endometrium and the embryo [4].

The results found that in the GnRH-ant protocol, a slightly elevated progesterone level will reduce the clinical pregnancy rate. We re-analyzed the GnRH-ant cycles with the progesterone level 1.0–1.5 ng/ml, and found that when the progesterone level was higher than 1.4 ng/ml, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly reduced. One study found that progesterone level ≤ 0.5 ng/ml on the day of hCG injection hinder live birth rate [6]. Contrast with this study, we did not show the negative effect of lower progesterone level on the clinical pregnancy.

An important strength of the present study was that it is the first study to have compared progesterone < 1.0 ng/ml and progesterone > 1.0 to < 1.5 ng/ml. The main limitation of our study was its retrospective nature. In addition, the present study did not assess the ongoing-pregnancy, live birth and so on.

Conclusion

The present study suggests the slight elevation progesterone level on the hCG trigger day may have a negative effect on the clinical pregnancy in GnRH-ant cycles. In the case of progesterone > 1.4 ng/ml on the hCG injection day, freeze-all strategy was recommended.

Availability of data and materials

All data is available in this paper.

Abbreviations

ART:

Assisted reproductive technology

CPR:

Clinical pregnancy rate

COS:

Controlled ovarian stimulation

References

  1. Saharkhiz N, Salehpour S, Tavasoli M, Aghighi A. Premature progesterone rise at human chorionic gonadotropin triggering day has no correlation with intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015;13:79–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nagaraja N, Talwar P, Mukherjee B, Chakrabarty B. Correlation between serum progesterone level on the day of ovulation trigger during in vitro fertilization and its effect on treatment outcome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2019;12:136–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ochsenkühn R, Arzberger A, Von Schönfeldt V, Gallwas J, Rogenhofer N, Crispin A, et al. Subtle progesterone rise on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration is associated with lower live birth rates in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: A retrospective study with 2,555 fresh embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:347–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu L, Sailan S, Li T, Mariee N, Laird S, Jiang Z, et al. The effect of a high progesterone concentration before oocyte retrieval on the peri-implantation endometrium. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:739–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Corti L, Papaleo E, Pagliardini L, Rabellotti E, Molgora M, La Marca A, et al. Fresh blastocyst transfer as a clinical approach to overcome the detrimental effect of progesterone elevation at hCG triggering: A strategy in the context of the Italian law. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171:73–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Santos-Ribeiro S, Polyzos NP, Haentjens P, Smitz J, Camus M, Tournaye H, et al. Live birth rates after IVF are reduced by both low and high progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1698–705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Lainas GT, Sfontouris IA, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Estimating the net effect of progesterone elevation on the day of hCG on live birth rates after IVF: A cohort analysis of 3296 IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:684–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C.A.Venetis, E.M.Kolibianakis, E.Papanikolaou, J.Bontis, P.Devroey BCT. Is progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration associated with the probability of pregnancy in in vitro fertilization? A systematic review and meta-analysis. By Venetis et al (2007) [3]. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:343–55.

  9. Bosch E, Valencia I, Escudero E, Crespo J, Simón C, Remohí J, et al. Premature luteinization during gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles and its relationship with in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1444–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang Y, Wang EY, Du QY, Xiong YJ, Guo XY, Yu YP, et al. Progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration adversely affects the outcome of IVF with transferred embryos at different developmental stages. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0075-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Connell MT, Patounakis G, Healy MW, DeCherney AH, Devine K, Widra E, et al. Is the effect of premature elevated progesterone augmented by human chorionic gonadotropin versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger? Fertil Steril. 2016;106:584–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:433–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee CI, Chen HH, Huang CC, Lin PY, Lee TH, Lee MS. Early progesterone change associated with pregnancy outcome after fresh embryo transfer in assisted reproduction technology cycles with progesterone level of >1.5 ng/ml on human chorionic gonadotropin trigger day. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robati S, Saab W, Durán-Retamal M, Saab W, Theodorou E, Cawood S, et al. The association between elevated progesterone level on day of hCG trigger and live birth rates in ART cycles: a single centre observational study. J Reprod Infertil. 2020;21:283–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiliçdag EB, Haydardedeoglu B, Cok T, Hacivelioglu SO, Bagis T. Premature progesterone elevation impairs implantation and live birth rates in GnRH-agonist IVF/ICSI cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281:747–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papaleo E, Corti L, Vanni VS, Pagliardini L, Ottolina J, De Michele F, et al. Basal progesterone level as the main determinant of progesterone elevation on the day of hCG triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:169–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu B, Li Z, Zhang H, Jin L, Li Y, Ai J, et al. Serum progesterone level effects on the outcome of in vitro fertilization in patients with different ovarian response: An analysis of more than 10,000 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1321-1327.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Griesinger G, Mannaerts B, Andersen CY, Witjes H, Kolibianakis EM, Gordon K. Progesterone elevation does not compromise pregnancy rates in high responders: a pooled analysis of in vitro fertilization patients treated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone/gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in six trials. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1622-1628.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tokgoz VY, Ekici GC, Tekin AB. The efficiency of progesterone/estradiol and progesterone/follicle ratio without elevated trigger-day progesterone levels on the reproductive outcomes of GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;1:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2021.1878137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fleming R, Jenkins J. The source and implications of progesterone rise during the follicular phase of assisted reproduction cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:446–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.05.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hugues JN. Impact of “LH activity” supplementation on serum progesterone levels during controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:232–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Park JH, Jee BC, Kim SH. Factors influencing serum progesterone level on triggering day in stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2015;42:67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin YJ, Lan KC, Huang FJ, Lin PY, Chiang HJ, Kung FT. Reproducibility and clinical significance of pre-ovulatory serum progesterone level and progesterone/estradiol ratio on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration in infertile women undergoing repeated in vitro fertilization cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu L, Xiong Y, Wang M, Shi H, Sun Y. Effect of progesterone on hCG day-to-basal progesterone ratio on live birth rate in long agonist fresh IVF/ICSI cycles: a 5-year, single-center study of more than 10,000 cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;1:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2020.1832067.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mascarenhas M, Kamath MS, Chandy A, Kunjummen AT. Progesterone/estradiol ratio as a predictor in the ART cycles with premature progesterone elevation on the day of hCG trigger. J Reprod Infertil. 2015;16:155–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Golbasi H, Ince O, Golbasi C, Ozer M, Demir M, Yilmaz B. Effect of progesterone/estradiol ratio on pregnancy outcome of patients with high trigger-day progesterone levels undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39:157–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2018.1504204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simon C, Branet L, Moreau J, Gatimel N, Cohade C, Lesourd F, et al. Association between progesterone to number of mature oocytes index and live birth in GnRH antagonist protocols. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38:901–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.01.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lawrenz B, Fatemi HM. Effect of progesterone elevation in follicular phase of IVF-cycles on the endometrial receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34:422–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.01.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

There was no acknowledgement.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

    Jing Zhao, Jie Hao, Bin Xu, Yonggang Wang & Yanping Li

Authors
  1. Jing Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yonggang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yanping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JZ participated in the design of the study and the acquisition of data, performed the statistical analysis, drafted the article and revised it critically. YL contributed to conception and design. JH conducted acquisition of data and analysis and interpretation of data. BX and YW participated in the interpretation of the data and the revision of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanping Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

No applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Hao, J., Xu, B. et al. Effect of slightly elevated progesterone on hCG trigger day on clinical pregnancy rate in GnRH-ant IVF/ICSI cycles. Reprod Health 19, 66 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01371-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01371-4

Keywords

Reproductive Health

ISSN: 1742-4755