Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between exposure to social media and knowledge of sexual and reproductive health among adolescent girls: evidence from the UDAYA survey in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India

Reproductive Health volume 19, Article number: 178 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Poor sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes amongst adolescent girls in India have been associated with inadequate knowledge of SRH. Evidence suggests that social media can promote health-seeking behaviors. Our objective in this study was to determine the association between exposure to social media and SRH knowledge among adolescent girls in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 10,425 adolescent girls from the UDAYA survey (wave-2, 2018–19). Girls’ exposure to social media was the key predictor, and SRH knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy, contraceptive methods, and HIV/AIDS were outcomes of interest. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between exposure to social media and knowledge of SRH among adolescent girls.

Results

Of the study participants (n = 10,425), 28.0% (n = 3,160) had exposure to social media. Overall, 8.7%, 11.4%, and 6.6% of respondents had sufficient knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy, contraceptive methods, and HIV/AIDS, respectively. Exposure to social media was associated with increased odds of knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18, 1.61), contraceptive methods (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.27, 1.67), and HIV/AIDS (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.84, 2.58).

Conclusions

Our study shows the potency of exposure to social media in influencing SRH knowledge, which exclusively benefits female adolescents who are educated, residing in urban areas, and from wealthier families. Digital media-focused interventions inclusive of socio-cultural contexts (e.g., strategic investment in education and creating economic opportunities) are crucial to optimize social media's impact on SRH knowledge enhancements.

Plain language summary

A substantial body of research shows that adolescent girls in India lack adequate sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge. Evidently, this puts them at several health risks associated with early pregnancies, preventable gynecological morbidities such as irregular menstrual patterns, and urethral discharge, among several others. Perpetuated social stigma and lack of agency impede adolescents especially from marginalized communities from accessing accurate, sufficient, and timely SRH information from their immediate household members and healthcare providers at local service points. This adversely affects their health-seeking behaviors and ultimately results in avertable poor reproductive health outcomes. A growing body of literature highlights social media platforms (i.e., Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc.) as preferred modalities to gain SRH information among adolescents. Against this backdrop, we assessed the intricate association between social media exposure and SRH knowledge (across three dimensions: sexual intercourse and pregnancy, contraceptive methods, and HIV/AIDS) among adolescent girls in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India. We tested for association between several socio-demographic factors and SRH knowledge. Findings indicate that adolescents who were exposed to social media platforms were likely to have more SRH knowledge compared to those who were not. Socio-demographic factors like place of residence, for example residing in urban areas, higher levels of education and high wealth index acted as facilitators of social media exposure as well as SRH knowledge.

Peer Review reports

Background

Adolescence is a critical transition period from childhood to adulthood that determines the health and wellbeing of an individual in the latter part of life. India is the country with the largest number of adolescents aged 10 to 19 years globally (253 million), of which nearly 50% are females [1]. Recognizing the importance of protecting the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and wellbeing of adolescents, India has implemented strategies including the Adolescent Reproductive and Sexual Health Strategy (ARSH) (2005–2013) and Rashtriya Kishor Swasthya Karyakram, or National Adolescent Health Programme (2014–present, replacing ARSH). Both were designed to support and escalate the demand for essential adolescent health services [2, 3]. Despite these initiatives, many adolescent girls face structural barriers to accessing accurate and timely information on their SRH, resulting in around 2.4 million adolescents with an unmet need for modern contraception for instance [4,5,6,7].

A cross-sectional survey conducted in rural Jharkhand, India, indicated a complete lack of essential SRH knowledge, where 94% of young women claimed to have never received any information regarding critical sexual health-related matters such as abortion and contraception [8]. Another study from Jharkhand highlighted that only 30% of participants were cognizant of contraception, 24% expressed sufficient knowledge about oral contraception, and even fewer, e.g., about 10% of married girls had ever used contraceptive methods to delay early childbearing [9].

The absence of or insufficient SRH information negatively affects fertility decisions and predisposes young women to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as maternal/neonatal mortality, low birth weight, and premature births. It also increases vulnerability to adverse effects following use of medications. For example, having ingested wrong doses of medicines. It also predisposes young women to preventable gynecological morbidities such as irregular menstrual patterns, urethral discharge, and burning urination, which result in poor health outcomes [10,11,12,13,14,15]. As per available evidence, social stigma, Lack of female autonomy arising from limited individual financial resources and restricted social mobility prevent girls specifically from disadvantaged communities to access accurate, sufficient, and timely SRH information from healthcare providers at local service points [6, 12, 16,17,18]. Restrictive social conservative norms prevailing in rural India result in insufficient and inadequate parent-adolescent communication which majorly restricts girls from gaining and developing SRH knowledge from parents and immediate household members.

An emerging body of literature suggests a paradigm shift in the information-seeking behavior of adolescents where they are likely to receive SRH information from traditional mass media such as print, television, and radio to social media platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp [8, 14, 19,20,21]. Considering there have been efforts to expand mobile health (mHealth) centric health communication in India through direct text messages and phone calls, questions remain about the capacity and strength of social media platforms in shaping SRH knowledge among adolescent girls [22,23,24]. Given the high presence of social media users in India [22], it is vital to assess its potential reach in propagating accurate SRH-related information. Against this backdrop, we aim to assess the association between social media exposure and SRH knowledge among adolescent girls in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India. Since adolescent girls consistently face discriminatory service provision and are highly vulnerable to adverse SRH outcomes, it is imperative to understand this association, which could adequately empower girls with sufficient SRH information.

Methods

Study setting

This study was based on data collected from two Indian states, namely Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Uttar Pradesh is the most populous state in the country, with a population of 200 million, accounting for 17% of India’s population. With a population of 104 million, Bihar is the third-largest state in terms of population, accounting for 9% of India’s population [25]. In both states, most of the population live in rural areas, with just 11% and 22% of the people residing in urban areas of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, respectively, in 2011 [25]. Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are the poorest among all Indian states, with 34% of the population in Bihar and 29% in Uttar Pradesh living below the poverty line in 2011–12 [26]. Female literacy in both states is below the nation’s average (65%), where 52% of females in Bihar and 57% of females in Uttar Pradesh are literate [25]. Child marriages and adolescent pregnancies are widespread in both states, with 41% of women in Bihar and 16% of women aged 20–24 years in Uttar Pradesh being married before 18 years [27]. About 11% and 3% of pregnancies occur during adolescence in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, respectively [27]. In terms of female ownership of mobile phones and access to internet, these states are one of the least performers among Indian states. In Bihar, about one-half of women (51%) own a mobile phone and 21% of them accessed the internet. In Uttar Pradesh, fewer than half of women (47%) had a mobile phone and 59% had accessed the internet in 2019–21 [27]. Evidence also suggests that the use of SRH services is substantially low in these states [28]. Fewer than half of the women of reproductive age (44–45%) used any modern methods of contraception to avoid or delay pregnancy in both states during the period 2019–2021 [27].

Data source

Data for this cross-sectional study was drawn from the “Understanding the Lives of Adolescents and Young Adults (UDAYA)” survey conducted by the Population Council. This data is a unique longitudinal survey of adolescent boys and girls (aged 10–19 years) in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. The UDAYA project provides robust insights into factors that determine the transition from adolescence to early adulthood. The survey includes information about the lives of adolescents and young adults such as education, economic activity, knowledge, and awareness about SRH, mass media and social media exposure, aspirations, agency, gender role attitudes, romantic and sexual relationships, transition to marriage and parenthood, health, and health-seeking behavior [28].

The UDAYA survey adopted a multi-stage systematic sampling design to draw the sample from rural and urban areas. A total of 150 primary sampling units (PSUs)—villages in rural areas and census wards in urban areas—were selected. The 2011 census list of villages and wards served as the sampling frame. Complete mapping and household listing operation were carried out in each selected PSU. Based on this list, a PSU was divided into two nearly equal segments—one segment was randomly chosen for conducting interviews with females and the other for interviews with males. In each PSU, households were selected with equal probability from the list using systematic sampling. Only one respondent from each category was interviewed within each household, resulting in a maximum of three interviews per household—one younger girl, one unmarried older girl, and one married older girl in the female segment, and one younger boy, one older boy, and one married older girl in the male segment. If a household had more than one respondent from a single category, the Kish table was used to select one respondent randomly, and no replacement of the respondent was allowed [28, 29].

In the end, 20,594 interviews (5,969 boys and 14,625 girls) were completed in both states in 2015–16 (wave-1). Among these 20,994 eligible respondents, UDAYA again re-interviewed 4,567 boys and 12,251 girls in 2018–19. The reasons for the loss to follow-up were migration of the participant, refusal to be re-interviewed by the parent or guardian, researchers’ inability to track the household, and refusal by the participant. Participants who gave an inconsistent response to age and education were excluded (3%) from the sample. Thus, the final sample in the follow-up survey (wave-2) comprised 4,428 boys and 11,864 girls, with an effective follow-up rate of 74% for boys and 81% for girls.

Ethical considerations

This study uses publicly available secondary data and as such did not any ethical approval from an institutional review board. The UDAYA survey which informed this study was approved by the ethical review board of Population Council, New Delhi. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects at the time of the survey. Informed consent was sought from a parent or guardian of unmarried adolescents aged 10–17 years [28, 29].

Process of sub-sample selection for this study

In wave-2 (2018–19), 16,292 adolescent boys and girls were successfully re-interviewed. Since questions on access to social media and knowledge of SRH were asked among respondents aged 15 years or older, we limited our sample to older cohorts of girls. Therefore, we excluded the sample of 4428 unmarried boys (aged 10–14 years and 15–19 years) and 1439 unmarried younger girls (aged 10–14 years). For this study, we drew data from a subset of 10,425 samples from wave-2 (2018–19), based on the cohorts of unmarried and married girls (aged 15–19 years at wave-1, 2015–16) who were 18–22 years at wave-2, 2018–19. Figure 1 illustrates the process of selecting the sub-sample for conducting this research.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart showing selection of study participants

Full size image

Measures

Knowledge of SRH

Knowledge of SRH was the outcome of interest in this study. We included three outcome variables in this study: (1) knowledge about sexual intercourse and pregnancy, (2) knowledge of contraceptive methods, and (3) knowledge of HIV/AIDS. We categorized each outcome variable into girls with sufficient knowledge (coded as ‘1’) and girls with insufficient knowledge (coded as ‘0’).

Knowledge about sexual intercourse and pregnancy was assessed from two specific questions: (1) can a woman get pregnant the first time she has sexual intercourse? And (2) are there certain days when a woman is more likely to become pregnant if she has sexual relations from one menstrual period to the next? If respondents answered ‘yes’, they were further asked about the timing of pregnancy: is this time just before her period begins, during her period, right after her period has ended, or halfway between two periods? Participants who responded ‘halfway between two periods’ were considered to have correct knowledge about the timing of pregnancy. A dichotomous variable was constructed where participants who had the correct knowledge on both questions were considered to have sufficient knowledge (coded as ‘1’), otherwise having insufficient knowledge (coded as ‘0’).

Knowledge of contraceptive methods was assessed from responses provided to the three questions on family planning methods to avoid or delay pregnancy. As per the survey tool, participants were initially asked whether they had heard of contraceptive methods. Participants who responded ‘yes’ were further asked the three following questions: (1) How often should a woman take oral pills to prevent pregnancy? (2) How soon after sexual intercourse should these pills be taken? And (3) one condom can be used for how many acts of sexual intercourse? Participants who answered that a woman should take oral pills everyday/weekly, take emergency contraceptive pills within three days/72 h after sexual intercourse, and that one condom could be used for one sexual intercourse were assessed to have provided correct answers to the respective questions on contraceptive methods. Those who had given the right answers to any two questions were considered to have sufficient knowledge (coded as ‘1’), otherwise insufficient knowledge (coded as ‘0’).

Knowledge of HIV/AIDS was assessed with five questions—three common misconceptions about HIV (the AIDS virus being transmitted through mosquito bites, sharing food with a person who has AIDS, and hugging someone who has AIDS) and two major ways of preventing HIV (people reduce their chances of getting the AIDS virus by having just one sex partner and using a condom every time they have sex). Respondents who rejected these misconceptions about the AIDS virus and knew the ways of preventing HIV were assessed to have provided the correct answers to these questions about HIV/AIDS. Those who had the correct answers to all five questions were considered to have sufficient knowledge (coded as ‘1’), otherwise insufficient knowledge (coded as ‘0’).

Exposure to social media

Exposure to social media among females was considered the key predictor variable to assess its association with the knowledge of SRH. In UDAYA (wave 2, 2018–19), respondents were asked about their use of social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, WeChat, Instagram, Jio chat, Messenger chat, and any other) in the last three years, based on data collected in the UDAYA survey. The information was collected as multiple responses from the participants. Based on these responses, we constructed a binary variable where participants who used any social media platforms were considered to have exposure to social media (coded ‘1’). In contrast, those who do not have internet access, do not know about social media, and have not used social media in the last three years were not exposed to social media (coded as ‘0’).

Explanatory variables

We included nine socio-demographic characteristics in the analysis that potentially influence girls’ exposure to social media and their knowledge of SRH. The selection of these explanatory variables is based on previous studies [8, 43, 44]. These variables include the age of respondents (15–19 years), place of residence (urban and rural), caste (Scheduled Caste [SC], Scheduled Tribe [ST], Other Backward Class [OBC], and non-SC/ST/OBC [General caste]), religion (Hindu, Muslim, others), educational attainment (no education, primary, secondary, higher), paid work in last 12 months (no and yes), marital status (unmarried and married), wealth quintile (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, and richest), and states (Uttar Pradesh and Bihar). Table 1 provides a brief description of the variables included in this study.

Table 1 Description of variables included in the study
Full size table

Analysis

We performed descriptive statistics to show the distribution of study participants by socio-demographic characteristics. The percentage distribution was estimated to observe the differentials in exposure to social media and the knowledge of SRH (sufficient knowledge vs insufficient knowledge) by the selected explanatory variables. The appropriate sample weight was used to estimate the percentages, and differences were tested using Pearson’s Chi-square statistic.

A multivariable binary logistic regression model was applied to examine socio-demographic determinants of exposure to social media. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed for each outcome variable to assess the association between exposure to social media and SRH. The results of regression models were presented by odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). P-values indicated the level of significance. All statistical analyses were executed using STATA SE version 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Characteristics of respondents

A total of 10,425 adolescent girls were analyzed in the present study, with a median age of 17 years (SD =  ± 1.4). The majority lived in rural areas (84.3%) and were Hindu (79.4%). Over half of the participants (57.6%) belonged to the OBC category. Sixty-two per cent of the girls were at the secondary level of education, and nearly one-quarter of them (23.2%) were involved in any paid work during the last year. Over half of the respondents (54%) were unmarried at data collection. More than two-fifths of the participants (43.3%) belonged to the bottom 40% of the household wealth quintile. The representation of the study sample was almost similar in both states (53% in Bihar vs 47% in Uttar Pradesh (Table 2).

Table 2 Sample distribution of study participants, UDAYA (wave-2, 2018–19)
Full size table

Knowledge of SRH

Overall, 8.7%, 11.4%, and 6.6% of adolescent girls had sufficient knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy, contraceptive methods, and HIV/AIDS, respectively. Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of girls exposed to social media had sufficient knowledge across all three indices of SRH than those who were not (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage distribution of sufficient knowledge of SRH (%) by exposure to social media, UDAYA (wave-2, 2018–19)

Full size image

Exposure to and use of social media

Of the total study participants, 28% (n = 3160) had exposure to social media. Among various social media platforms, WhatsApp (26.2%) was the most used platform, followed by Facebook (9.5%) and Instagram (1.9%) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Use of social media platforms by the study participants (n = 3160, 28.0%), UDAYA (wave-2, 2018–19)

Full size image

Differentials and determinants of exposure to social media

Participants residing in urban areas were twice as exposed as those in rural areas (48.8% vs 24.1%, p < 0.001). Exposure to social media was higher among girls who belonged to the general caste (44.5%) than those from SC (18.4%), ST (24%), and OBC (26.4%) (p < 0.001). Participants’ exposure to social media significantly increased with their increasing levels of education (p < 0.001). Respondents involved in paid work in the last year had a 2%-point greater exposure to social media than those not involved (p = 0.04). The proportionate share of social media exposure was higher among unmarried girls than married ones (31.9% vs 23.5%, p < 0.001). Exposure to social media substantially differed across wealth quintiles (p < 0.001), where only one in ten respondents from the poorest quintile was exposed to social media (9.9%). In contrast, more than half of the richest quintile had exposure to social media (52.4%). Girls from Bihar had higher exposure to social media than those from Uttar Pradesh (29.2% vs 26.6%, p < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Participants’ exposure to social media by socio-demographic characteristics, UDAYA (wave-2, 2018–19)
Full size table

Amongst all the included socio-demographic variables, education and household wealth had the strongest associations with social media exposure. Girls with higher educational attainment were 12 times (OR: 12.01; 95% CI: 9.36, 15.41) more likely to be exposed to social media than illiterate ones. Respondents from the richest wealth quintile were associated with six times (OR: 6.13; 95% CI: 5.11, 7.37) higher odds of social media exposure compared to the poorest quintile. The odds of exposure to social media were 50% lower among rural girls (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.56) compared to those living in urban areas. The odds of exposure to social media were higher among girls from the general caste (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.48, 2.05) as compared to SC girls. Adolescents involved in paid work were more likely to be exposed to social media (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.39) than those not involved. Girls from Bihar were twice more likely to be exposed to social media (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.82, 2.25) than those from Uttar Pradesh (Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariable binary logistic regression models assessing the odds of social media exposure among adolescent girls aged 15–19 years, UDAYA (wave-2, 2018–19)
Full size table

Association between exposure to social media and knowledge of SRH

We found a higher share of sufficient knowledge about sexual intercourse and pregnancy (12% vs 7.5%, p < 0.001), contraceptive methods (15.9% vs 9.7%, p < 0.001), and HIV/AIDS (14% vs 3.8%, p < 0.001) among girls who were exposed to social media than those who were not exposed. The sufficient knowledge of SRH under all three indices increased with the age of the participants. Girls living in urban areas had greater knowledge of contraceptive methods (13.7% vs 11%, p < 0.001) and HIV/AIDS (13.5% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001) than their rural counterparts. Adolescent girls who belonged to the general caste were found to be significantly more knowledgeable about sexual intercourse and pregnancy (9.3%) and HIV/AIDS (10.4%) compared to the girls from disadvantaged castes (p = 0.003). For contraceptive methods, there was a higher proportion of ST girls who had more knowledge (19.8%) compared to the girls from other caste groups (p < 0.001). Girls having higher education were more knowledgeable about sexual intercourse and pregnancy (9.3% vs 6.3%, p < 0.001), contraceptive methods (17% vs 9.1%, p < 0.001), and HIV/AIDS (17.7% vs 0.7%, p < 0.001) when compared with illiterate girls. When compared to unmarried girls, married girls reported a significantly higher percentage of sufficient knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy (13.2% vs 4.9%, p < 0.001) and contraceptive methods (16% vs 7.6%, p < 0.001); however, unmarried girls were more informed about HIV/AIDS (7.6% vs 5.5%, p < 0.001). Compared to girls from the poorest quintile, a considerably higher percentage of girls from the richest quintile had sufficient knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy (12.3% vs 6%, p < 0.001), contraceptive methods (16.1% vs 8.2%, p < 0.001), and HIV/AIDS (15.1% vs 1.9%, p < 0.001). Girls residing in Bihar had a greater proportion of sufficient knowledge about sexual intercourse and pregnancy (10.7% vs 6.5%, p < 0.001) and contraceptive methods (12.2% vs 10.6%, p < 0.001) than those residing in Uttar Pradesh (Table 5).

Table 5 Percentage distribution of knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy, contraceptive methods and HIV/AIDS by the key predictor and explanatory variables among adolescent girls aged 15–19 years, UDAYA (wave-2, 2018–19)
Full size table

Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that exposure to social media was significantly associated with higher odds of knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.61), contraceptive methods (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.27, 1.67), and HIV/AIDS (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.84, 2.58). Among socio-demographic characteristics, educational attainment imparted a strong positive association with all three indices of SRH. Specifically, girls with higher education had almost nine-fold greater odds of knowledge about HIV/AIDS (OR: 8.73; 95% CI: 5.18, 14.72) than uneducated ones. Adolescent girls living in rural areas were less likely to have knowledge of contraceptive methods (OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.93) and HIV/AIDS (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.74) than those from urban areas. Married girls were more likely to have correct information about sexual intercourse and pregnancy (OR: 3.34; 95% CI: 2.77, 4.02) and contraceptive methods (OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 2.44, 3.34) than unmarried ones. Household wealth also had a significant positive association with all three indices of SRH, where girls from the richest quintile were 1.75 (95% CI: 1.37, 2.23), 2.05 (95% CI: 1.66, 2.54), and 3.07 (95% CI: 2.21, 4.27) times more likely to know about sexual intercourse and pregnancy, contraceptive methods, and HIV/AIDS (Table  6).

Table 6 Multivariable logistic regression models assessing the association between girls' exposure to social media and knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy, contraceptive methods and HIV/AIDS, UDAYA (wave-2, 2018–19)
Full size table

Discussion

We find that exposure to social media has a significant positive association with the knowledge of sexual intercourse and pregnancy, contraceptive methods, and HIV/AIDS. This association was retained even after adjusting for socio-demographic factors in multivariate analyses. Amongst all the socio-demographic factors, education and wealth index imparted the strongest association, emphasizing education and household wealth as important facilitators of social media accessibility and SRH knowledge acquisition. In contrast, rural residence emerged as the most prominent deterrent to social media accessibility and SRH knowledge gain. Although marital status showed no association with exposure to social media, married adolescent girls were significantly well informed about sexual intercourse, and pregnancy, and contraceptive methods.

Broadly, our comprehensive analyses provided a nuanced understanding of the association between exposure to social media and SRH knowledge at the intersection of pervasive context-specific/regional structural inequities. Inequities across socio-economic groups substantially hinder disadvantaged adolescents from accessing social networking platforms and deny all possible associated direct and indirect health benefits. For example, girls from rural areas, less educated, and belonging to economically impaired families were significantly less likely to engage in any social media platforms and were found to be poorly informed about SRH. Low social media exposure in rural areas is mainly a potential manifestation of the urban/rural digital divide and pervasive gender inequity, restricting girls from internet-facilitated social media connectivity. Raj et al. highlighted the presence of low digital connectivity in the rural areas of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh (India), demonstrating its association with inequitable gender role beliefs [30].

Regarding education, less-educated adolescent girls are likely to have lower self-efficacy and less agency/autonomy to participate in household decision-making, potentially resulting in reduced access to digital connectivity. Evidence from rural Madhya Pradesh, India, showed higher digital technology engagement and responsiveness to digital health interventions among beneficiaries (pregnant and postpartum women of reproductive age 15–49 years) who were comparatively more educated [31, 32]. Higher education opens doors to economic opportunities. Educated girls are more likely to engage in paid jobs, leading to financial independence. The greater odds of social media exposure among girls involved in paid work imply economic empowerment (personal mobile phone ownership/internet access) related to freedom of movement as possible factors. These findings are in parallel with earlier studies conducted by Raj et al. (2021) and Scott et al. (2021) [30, 31]. Affordability and the capacity to sustainably support the functionality of new-age digital devices supposedly enable wealthier adolescents to get more access to cellular devices and exposure to social media compared to their poorest counterparts [30, 32].

The multivariate regression models conducted in our study showed a strong positive association between exposure to social media and SRH knowledge, highlighting social media as an important medium for enhancing health awareness among adolescent girls. Previous studies suggested that social-media-led knowledge diffusion improved sexual practices among adolescents through increased adaptation of condom usage and other modern methods of contraception [21, 33]. Evidence from Ghana and Tanzania underlines an increasing reliance on Facebook and WhatsApp among adolescents, asserting familiarity, feasibility, confidentiality, and comfort of sharing and exchanging knowledge with other similar age group teens being the major reasons [34,35,36].

Evidence from a growing body of literature suggests that exposure to social media is a promising pathway to empower communities by facilitating two-way health communication and learning through diverse reproductive and behavioral change interventions or campaigns. It also facilitates interactive health discussions in private social groups, developing and strengthening online relationships with clinicians, recording health behaviors through various health surveys, and participating in diverse digital health programs, including mHealth programs [20, 22, 23, 37,38,39,40,41].

In our study, although exposure to social media showed a significant association with levels of SRH knowledge, educational attainment, household wealth, and place of residence (urban vs rural) strictly exerted a greater influence on it. Findings suggest that higher education potentially enables young girls to get exposed to diverse health awareness programs and internet sources, remain up to date with health recommendations and establish inner confidence and motivation, which positively affect health and knowledge-seeking behaviors. Mohan et al. (2021) recognized that even though the beneficiaries (women of reproductive age 15–49 years) receive health messages, sufficient education is a prerequisite to interpret and contextualize the content adequately through health improvements [32]. In rural areas, reduced access to SRH-related facilities affected by social stigma, interrupted and degraded services, and sparse local health facilities assumably result in poor SRH knowledge and awareness among adolescents [13, 42]. In parallel with other findings, lower odds of SRH knowledge in poor households could be attributed to a lack of or less education background, reduced exposure to health awareness programs, mass media sources, and restricted socio-cultural norms/gender role beliefs [43,44,45].

For other factors, although marital status showed no significant association with social media exposure, married girls were found to be at greater odds of having sufficient knowledge about sexual intercourse and pregnancy and contraceptive methods than unmarried ones. This finding is probably because married girls are comparatively more exposed to and supported by mainstream maternal health outreach programs that directly augment their awareness of adopting healthy sexual practices. These findings highlight a particular area of concern and reinforce the need to intensify efforts on more inclusive age- and context-specific adolescent health programs. Additionally, marital status showed no association with HIV/AIDS knowledge. This finding could be due to a lack of/weak HIV/AIDS-related advocacy programs, which receive minimal attention in maternal healthcare policies, a lack of awareness campaigns and social stigma, resulting in having insufficient knowledge about HIV/AIDS among adolescent girls [46].

Where restrictive social norms prevail, social media disengagement prevents girls from seeking urgent SRH information and countering misinformation/misconceptions, which can negatively affect their health-seeking behaviors and practices. When factors like logistic challenges, sub-optimal provision of services at the point of care, and social taboo inhibit adolescents from adequately seeking health information, social media provides a unique opportunity for the adolescent girls to realize their opportunities while maintaining strict confidentiality. Recent evidence from India recognizes Facebook as a rapid, cost-effective, and powerful tool in achieving socio-behavioral change, thus empowering marginalized adolescents with effective health communication and enhanced knowledge [22].

Since deep entrenched restrictive social norms restrict girls’ social mobility, digital technologies equipped with social media offer an effective channel enabling social participation, improved interaction/communication among their own social networks [30]. This would not only improve SRH knowledge, but also has a potential in improving SRH behaviours and access to related services. While we present a strong positive association with social media exposure and improved SRH knowledge, we also noticed that the knowledge gains are unevenly distributed and significantly skewed among the wealthier and educated groups. Indeed, we are cognizant of the reality that efficient social media use would not be achievable without strategic investments in education and uplifting/revamping related social and structural integrity. Our results suggests that amplification of digital technologies and its diffusion should be supplemented with improved access to quality education which empower adolescent girls both socially and economically. In addition, given the persistent rural–urban digital divide in India, establishment of digital acceptability, affordability, and accessibility to uninterrupted quality use of digital technologies requires adequate prioritisation of both social (for example, dominant gendered power dynamics and cultural context affecting digital engagement behaviour) and structural (for example, technological context and spatial marginalisation) elements. These will be exceedingly important to support the accommodation of new age technology and lowering the struggle and competition for digital inclusion.

The present study has several strengths. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the multiple socio-demographic factors linked with exposure to social media and the extent to which social media connectivity is associated with the enhancement of knowledge across three selected dimensions of SRH among adolescent girls. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to provide this sort of evidence that has significant potential for policymaking. Our research findings add substantial value to the current knowledge gap in the existing literature to improve and promote health-seeking behaviors by interventions of a more-focused tailored approach to acquiring adequate SRH knowledge among female adolescents. However, some limitations need to be considered in interpreting the findings of this study. First, the study was confined to two states of India and cannot be generalized to the whole country. Second, the cross-sectional nature of the study design constrains us to determine any causal relationship between social media exposure and health knowledge. Future research could use a longitudinal study design to understand this association better. Third, the data collected in the survey was self-reported and retrospective, and thus it might suffer from non-systematic reporting bias and systematic recall bias. Finally, we included those explanatory variables that were available in the dataset and, therefore, unable to include other potential socio-cultural and behavioral covariates in the multivariable models that may have a significant influence on SRH knowledge.

Conclusion

Findings from this study indicate that exposure to social media is significantly associated with SRH knowledge among adolescent girls. Our study also found that girls who reside in urban areas, have higher levels of education and are from wealthier families are more likely to be informed about SRH knowledge than their counterparts, thus, majorly excluding adolescents from marginalized communities. While our findings present a strong association between social media and SRH knowledge, we recognize the inherent individual, social, and systemic challenges that differentially impact and deprive the most disadvantaged with fragmented or no health benefits. Thus, the policy implications of this study are two-fold. First, it will assist policymakers in future decision-making on strategic digital health investments. Second, it informs future program designing to consider multifaceted individual-level socio-demographic determinants for uniform and effective social media/digital media led SRH knowledge dissemination. To maximise benefits, ongoing and future digital media aided SRH programs should precisely identify and be mindful of contextual risk factors like socially embedded predominant patriarchal norms, interpersonal violence, which largely confine phone usage and limit individual phone ownership among married/unmarried adolescent girls [47].

Availability of data and materials

The data analyzed in this study was requested from the Harvard Dataverse repository through application of an official data request form. The UDAYA questionnaire is freely and publicly available from this link: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/ZJPKW5.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

mHealth:

Mobile health

OR:

Odds ratio

SRH:

Sexual and reproductive health

SC:

Scheduled caste

ST :

Scheduled tribe

OBC:

Other backward classes

HIV/AIDS:

Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome

UDAYA:

Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults

References

  1. Registrar General & Census Commissioner and United Nations Population Fund. A profile of adolescents and youth in India. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. 2014. https://india.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/AProfileofAdolescentsandYouthinIndia_0.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2022.

  2. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Implementation guide on RCH II ARSH Strategy: For State and District Programme Managers. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2006. https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/arsh/guidelines/implementation_guide_on_rch-2.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2022.

  3. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Rashtriya Kishore Swasthya Karyakram: Strategy Handbook. Adolescent Health Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2014. http://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/rksk-strategy-handbook.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2022

  4. Population Council. Adolescent health priorities and opportunities for Rashtriya Kishor Swasthya Karyakram (RKSK) in Uttar Pradesh. 2017. https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2017PGY_UDAYA-RKSKPolicyBriefUP.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2022

  5. Bhat N, Shankar P. India’s adolescents: taking charge of the future. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(12):847–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barua A, Watson K, Plesons M, Chandra-Mouli V, Sharma K. Adolescent health programming in India: a rapid review. Reprod Health. 2020;17:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Murro R, Chawla R, Pyne S, Venkatesh S, Sully EA. Adding it up: investing in the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents in India. 2021. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/investing-in-sexual-reproductive-health-adolescents-india.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2022.

  8. Banerjee SK, Andersen KL, Warvadekar J, Aich P, Rawat A, Upadhyay B. How prepared are young, rural women in India to address their sexual and reproductive health needs? A cross-sectional assessment of youth in Jharkhand. Reprod Health. 2015;12:97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rose-Clarke K, Pradhan H, Rath S, Rath S, Samal S, Gagrai S, Nair N, Tripathy P, Prost A. Adolescent girls’ health, nutrition and wellbeing in rural eastern India: a descriptive, cross-sectional community-based study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:673.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Banke-Thomas OE, Banke-Thomas AO, Ameh CA. Factors influencing utilisation of maternal health services by adolescent mothers in Low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM, Lammers C. Maternal-perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with adolescent pregnancy in Latin America: cross-sectional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):342–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardon A, Pell C, Taqueban E, Narasimhan M. Sexual and reproductive self care among women and girls: insights from ethnographic studies. BMJ. 2019;365:l1333.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar P, Srivastava S, Chauhan S, Patel R, Marbaniang SP, Dhillon P. Factors associated with gynaecological morbidities and treatment-seeking behaviour among adolescent girls residing in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(6): e0252521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Taqueban EM. A way out in Eden: maternal health crisis in Manila. Philippine Soc Sci Rev. 2013;65(2):1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zordo SD. A biomedicalização do aborto ilegal: a vida dupla do misoprostol no Brasil. História Ciências Saúde-Manguinhos. 2016;23(1):19–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanneving L, Trygg N, Saxena D, Mavalankar D, Thomsen S. Inequity in India: the case of maternal and reproductive health. Glob Health Action. 2013;6(1):19145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaw A. Attitudes to genetic diagnosis and to the use of medical technologies in pregnancy: Some British Pakistani perspectives. Reproductive agency, medicine and the State: cultural transformations in childbearing. Oxford: Berghahn Books; 2005. p. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh LP, Srinivasan K. Family planning and the scheduled tribes of Rajasthan: taking stock and moving forward. J Health Manag. 2000;2(1):55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones K, Williams J, Sipsma H, Patil C. Adolescent and emerging adults’ evaluation of a Facebook site providing sexual health education. Public Health Nurs. 2019;36(1):11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kelleher E, Moreno MA. Hot topics in social media and reproductive health. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020;33(6):619–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicholas A, Bailey JV, Stevenson F, Murray E. The Sexunzipped trial: young people’s views of participating in an online randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(12): e2647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Diamond-Smith N, Holton AE, Francis S, Bernard D. Addressing anemia among women in India—an informed intervention using Facebook Ad manager. Mhealth. 2020;6:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Narasimhan P, Bakshi A, Kittusami S, Prashant S, Mathai D, Bakshi K, MacIntyre CR, Ray P. A customized m-Health system for improving Tuberculosis treatment adherence and follow-up in south India. Heal Technol. 2014;4(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Modi D, Gopalan R, Shah S, Venkatraman S, Desai G, Desai S, Shah P. Development and formative evaluation of an innovative mHealth intervention for improving coverage of community-based maternal, newborn and child health services in rural areas of India. Glob Health Action. 2015;8(1):26769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Census of India 2011: Primary Census Abstract, Data Highlights, India, Series 1. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Government of India. 2013. Accessed 19 Jul 2022.

  26. Planning Commission. Press note on poverty estimates, 2011–12. Planning Commission, Government of India. 2013. http://static.expressindia.com/frontend/financial/pdf/pre_pov2307.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2022.

  27. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey-5, 2019–21: State Fact Sheet. IIPS, Mumbai. 2021. http://rchiips.org/nfhs/factsheet_NFHS-5.shtml. Accessed 19 Jul 2022.

  28. Santhya KG, Acharya R, Pandey N, Singh SK, Rampal S, Zavier AJ, Gupta AK. Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) in Bihar, India. https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2017PGY_UDAYA-BiharReport.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2022.

  29. Patel SK, Santhya KG, Haberland N. What shapes gender attitudes among adolescent girls and boys? Evidence from the UDAYA Longitudinal Study in India. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3): e0248766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Raj A, Johns NE, Bhan N, Silverman JG, Lundgren R. Effects of gender role beliefs on social connectivity and marital safety: findings from a cross-sectional study among married adolescent girls in India. J Adolesc Health. 2021;69(6):S65-73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scott K, Shinde A, Ummer O, Yadav S, Sharma M, Purty N, Jairath A, Chamberlain S, LeFevre AE. Freedom within a cage: how patriarchal gender norms limit women’s use of mobile phones in rural central India. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(Suppl 5): e005596.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohan D, Scott K, Shah N, Bashingwa JJ, Chakraborty A, Ummer O, Godfrey A, Dutt P, Chamberlain S, LeFevre AE. Can health information through mobile phones close the divide in health behaviours among the marginalised? An equity analysis of Kilkari in Madhya Pradesh, India. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(Suppl 5): e005512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Young SD, Jordan AH. The influence of social networking photos on social norms and sexual health behaviors. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(4):243–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Pfeiffer C, Kleeb M, Mbelwa A, Ahorlu C. The use of social media among adolescents in Dar es Salaam and Mtwara, Tanzania. Reprod Health Matters. 2014;22(43):178–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kachota BJ, Kassim M. Sexual and reproductive health information-seeking behaviour of undergraduate students at Mzumbe University, Morogoro-Tanzania. Univ Dar es Salaam Library J. 2021;16(1):115–30.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Adzovie DE, Adzovie RH. Impact of social media usage on adolescent sexual and reproductive health. In7th European Conference on Social Media ECSM 2020 2020 Jul 2, p. 10.

  37. Aragão JM, Gubert FD, Torres RA, Silva AS, Vieira NF. The use of Facebook in health education: perceptions of adolescent students. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71:265–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Byron P. Troubling expertise: social media and young people’s sexual health. Commun Res Pract. 2015;1(4):322–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dulli L, Ridgeway K, Packer C, Plourde KF, Mumuni T, Idaboh T, Olumide A, Ojengbede O, McCarraher DR. An online support group intervention for adolescents living with HIV in Nigeria: a pre-post test study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018;4(4): e12397.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Nardo B, Cannistrà M, Diaco V, Naso A, Novello M, Zullo A, Ruggiero M, Grande R, Sacco R. Optimizing patient surgical management using WhatsApp application in the Italian healthcare system. Telemed e-Health. 2016;22(9):718–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Johnston MJ, King D, Arora S, Behar N, Athanasiou T, Sevdalis N, Darzi A. Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. Am J Surg. 2015;209(1):45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mathew L, Francis LA. Perceived barriers for utilization of health care system among married women with gynaecological morbidity in Udupi Taluk, Karnataka. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2018;9(1):85–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Srivastava S, Chauhan S, Patel R, Kumar P. A study of awareness on HIV/AIDS among adolescents: a longitudinal study on UDAYA data. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Oginni AB, Adebajo SB, Ahonsi BA. Trends and determinants of comprehensive knowledge of HIV among adolescents and young adults in Nigeria: 2003–2013. Afr J Reprod Health. 2017;21(1):26–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tsala Dimbuene Z, Kuate DB. Fostering accurate HIV/AIDS knowledge among unmarried youths in Cameroon: do family environment and peers matter? BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Plesons M, Khanna A, Ziauddin M, Gogoi A, Chandra-Mouli V. Building an enabling environment and responding to resistance to sexuality education programmes: experience from Jharkhand. India Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bacchus LJ, Reiss K, Church K, Colombini M, Pearson E, Naved R, Smith C, Andersen K, Free C. Using digital technology for sexual and reproductive health: are programs adequately considering risk? Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019;7(4):507–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Population Council for granting us access to the UDAYA dataset.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ria Saha and Pintu Paul contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medway Council National Health Service, Kent, UK

    Ria Saha

  2. Centre for the Study of Regional Development, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India

    Pintu Paul

  3. School of International Development and Global Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

    Sanni Yaya

  4. The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Sanni Yaya

  5. Centre for Vulnerable Children and Families, Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK

    Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas

Authors
  1. Ria Saha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pintu Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanni Yaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AB-T conceptualized the study. RS sourced the data. AB-T, RS, and PP designed the study. PP conducted the statistical analysis for the study. AB-T and SY reviewed the analytical approach. RS and PP drafted the initial version of this manuscript. All authors revised subsequent versions of the manuscript and provided substantial inputs. Access to data: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript. All authors read, finalized, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The UDAYA survey which informed this study was approved by the ethical review board of Population Council, New Delhi. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects at the time of the survey. Informed consent was sought from a parent or guardian of unmarried adolescents aged 10–17 years.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

AB-T and SY are members of the Editorial Board of the Reproductive Health Journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saha, R., Paul, P., Yaya, S. et al. Association between exposure to social media and knowledge of sexual and reproductive health among adolescent girls: evidence from the UDAYA survey in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India. Reprod Health 19, 178 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01487-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01487-7

Keywords

Reproductive Health

ISSN: 1742-4755