Skip to main content
Download PDF

Volume 10 Supplement 1

Born too soon

Born Too Soon: Care before and between pregnancy to prevent preterm births: from evidence to action

Reproductive Health volume 10, Article number: S3 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Providing care to adolescent girls and women before and between pregnancies improves their own health and wellbeing, as well as pregnancy and newborn outcomes, and can also reduce the rates of preterm birth. This paper has reviewed the evidence based interventions and services for preventing preterm births; reported the findings from research priority exercise; and prescribed actions for taking this call further. Certain factors in the preconception period have been shown to increase the risk for prematurity and, therefore, preconception care services for all women of reproductive age should address these risk factors through preventing adolescent pregnancy, preventing unintended pregnancies, promoting optimal birth spacing, optimizing pre-pregnancy weight and nutritional status (including a folic acid containing multivitamin supplement, and ensuring that all adolescent girls have received complete vaccination. Preconception care must also address risk factors that may be applicable to only some women. These include screening for and management of chronic diseases, especially diabetes; sexually-transmitted infections; tobacco and smoke exposure; mental health disorders, notably depression; and intimate partner violence. The approach to research in preconception care to prevent preterm births should include a cycle of development and delivery research that evaluates how best to scale up coverage of existing, evidence-based interventions, epidemiologic research that assesses the impact of implementing these interventions, and discovery science that better elucidates the complex causal pathway of preterm birth and helps to develop new screening and intervention tools. In addition to research, policy and financial investment is crucial to increasing opportunities to implement preconception care, and rates of prematurity should be included as a tracking indicator in global and national maternal child health assessments.

Declaration

This article is part of a supplement jointly funded by Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives programme through a grant from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and March of Dimes Foundation and published in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The original article was published in PDF format in the WHO Report "Born Too Soon: the global action report on preterm birth (ISBN 978 92 4 150343 30). The article has been reformatted for journal publication and has undergone peer review according to Reproductive Health's standard process for supplements and may feature some variations in content when compared to the original report. This co-publication makes the article available to the community in a full-text format.

The importance of preconception health and care before pregnancy

Preconception care has, until recently, been a weak link in the continuum of care. Providing care to women and couples before and between pregnancies (interconception care) improves the chances of mothers and babies being healthy, and awareness is growing. Preconception care may be defined as "any intervention provided to women and couples of childbearing age, regardless of pregnancy status or desire, before pregnancy, to improve health outcomes for women, newborns and children"[1], or "a set of interventions that aim to identify and modify biomedical, behavioral and social risks to a woman's health or pregnancy outcome through prevention and management" [2]. An expanded scope and definitions for preconception care are provided in Figure 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Scope and definitions of preconception care. Source: Bhutta et al., 2011a.

Full size image

Preconception care emphasizes outcomes for maternal and child health; however, it is vital to recognize that all girls and boys have the right to grow and develop in good health, just as all women and men have the right to be healthy -- physically, psychologically and socially. Extending the RMNCH continuum to the preconception period improves the health and wellbeing of mothers, newborns and children as well as the health and wellbeing of girls and women, and boys and men, in their own right.

As shown in Figure 2, the conceptual framework for preconception care encompasses broader initiatives such as women's education and empowerment, and more targeted health interventions such as vaccination and micronutrient supplementation. Preconception care allows the time necessary for behavioral interventions to take effect. In various countries, it has been provided in schools, primary health care facilities or community centers, and has involved husbands, health care providers, youth leaders and community volunteers in achieving healthier outcomes for mothers and babies.

Figure 2
figure 2

Conceptual framework for preconception care. Source: Born Too Soon: The global action report on preterm birth, 2012.

Full size image

Many women, however, are unaware of how their health before conception may influence their risk of having an adverse outcome of pregnancy. As shown by the RMNCH continuum of care [3], health education and other programs delivered to all women during adolescence, before conception and between pregnancies can improve women's own health during pregnancy as well as that of their babies [4–6]. The imperative for preconception health is even greater given that 41% of all women report that their pregnancies were unplanned [7]. Thus, waiting to provide needed health interventions until a woman and her partner decide to have a child will be too late in 4 out of 10 pregnancies.

Preconception care simultaneously promotes reproductive planning and interventions to reduce risk, allowing women to enter pregnancy in the best possible health and to have the best possible chance of giving birth to a healthy newborn. Outreach and awareness must begin in adolescence if it is to truly improve the health of women and newborns and reduce the rates of prematurity and low birthweight (Figure 3). The contextual and individual risks that increase the likelihood of preterm births and other adverse pregnancy outcomes are present from the time a girl reaches adolescence, and they continue during and between pregnancies.

Figure 3
figure 3

Importance of preconception care for adolescent girls.

Full size image

The objectives of this paper are to review the evidence based interventions and services for preventing preterm births; report the findings from research priority exercise to list and rank important research options in preconception care; and prescribe actions for taking this agenda further.

Priority packages and evidenced-based interventions

There is growing evidence that reducing risks in the preconception period improves the health of the pregnant woman and also contributes to the prevention of preterm birth. Table 1 presents risk factors associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. These estimates were derived from a detailed review of the evidence base on preconception risk factors for all adverse outcomes of pregnancy and landmark reviews on the causes of preterm birth [1, 8–10].

Table 1 Risk factors associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and the effectiveness of intervention arrayed according to the strength of evidence
Full size table

Factors that have been shown to be strongly predictive of preterm risk, but cannot be modified, include history of previous spontaneous preterm birth, cervical procedures, including biopsies, primiparity, grand multiparity, and multiple gestations. Factors associated with socioeconomic and racial disadvantage will, hopefully, be amenable to positive transformation over the longer term, but this will require fundamental structural changes to society and a deep-seated shift in social values and norms.

Table 2 presents the priority evidence-based interventions and packages during the preconception period and before pregnancy that have potential to reduce preterm birth rates. These include interventions currently recommended by the WHO in the preconception period (e.g., family planning and prevention and treatment of STIs) [11]. Only interventions with evidence of strong or moderate effectiveness are described in the section below. Efforts are now underway to develop guidelines for preconception care and expand the package of interventions to include those listed in Table 2 -- for example, optimizing pre-pregnancy weight, screening for and treating mental health disorders and other chronic diseases like diabetes and hypertension, preventing intimate partner violence and promoting cessation of tobacco use and exposure to secondhand smoke in the home and workplace. It should be noted that because preconception care is a relatively new concept, the evidence base for risks and interventions before conception is still being strengthened. Thus, broad consensus regarding a package of evidence-based interventions for care in the preconception period has yet to be decided.

Table 2 Priority interventions and packages during the preconception period and before pregnancy to reduce preterm birth rates
Full size table

Preconception care services for prevention of preterm birth for all women

Prevent pregnancy in adolescence

Preconception care that begins early on and continues between pregnancies will help to ensure that women have a reproductive life plan and are able to decide when to have children, how many children they desire and methods used to prevent unintended pregnancy. In some regions, cultural norms promote early marriage, which is a factor in high rates of adolescent pregnancy. Regulations to increase the legal age at marriage and educating communities to change cultural norms that support early marriage may be ways to prevent adolescent pregnancy in those countries. In an effort to discover what interventions are most effective to prevent adolescent pregnancy, a wide variety of programs carried out in low-, middle-, and high-income countries has revealed that the most successful programs are responsive to the unique educational, social, economic, nutritional, psychological and medical needs of adolescents [12]. Particular emphasis must also be placed on ensuring universal access to primary and secondary education for girls through increasing formal and informal opportunities, because girls who complete their education are less likely to become pregnant in adolescence [13, 14] While expanded sexual education programs increase adolescents' knowledge of risk, they have not been shown to change behaviors. In a combined analysis, personal development programs that incorporated skills-building and include contraceptive provision were shown to prevent 15% of first adolescent pregnancies [15, 16] and programs that taught parenting skills and enabled teen mothers to complete their education decreased repeat adolescent pregnancies by 37% [1, 17, 18]. Across all contexts, programs demonstrated greater success if they were holistic in scope rather than solely focused on sexual education and STI/teen pregnancy prevention. It is important to note that programs with a longer duration were more effective since adolescents require time to integrate new information, practice the skills that will allow them to negotiate safe behaviors and develop confidence in themselves to broaden their life options [1, 15–18].

One way to ensure that mothers and babies have good outcomes is to encourage pregnancy planning. Women who have very closely spaced pregnancies (within 6 months of a previous live birth or pregnancy) are more likely to have preterm or low-birth weight babies [19]. This may be because they have not had enough time to replenish their nutritional reserves or treat an infection or other systemic illness. Therefore, adequately spaced pregnancies have beneficial impacts on health and survival of the living child. Family planning and contraception does not prevent future pregnancy but foster mother to provide more time to herself and to her living child. The correct, consistent use of family planning methods leads to more women spacing their pregnancies 18 to 24 months apart, which is ideal [20]. Encouraging family planning and the use of contraceptive methods (hormonal and barrier methods) has other advantages including reductions in maternal and infant mortality, lower rates of unintended pregnancies, and prevention of STIs, including HIV [19, 20].

Breast feeding promotion for 24 months can prevent closely spaced pregnancies, a method that continues to be underused despite strong evidence of its positive effect on maternal and newborn health. On its own, 12 months of contraception-only coverage in the preceding birth interval can reduce the mortality risk for the next newborn by 31.2%, whereas 12 months of contraceptive use overlapping with breastfeeding reduces the risk by 68.4% [20]. Programs to make effective contraception available to women and couples of reproductive age must also include counseling and follow-up to determine if the chosen method of contraception is being used correctly, and so that the method may be changed if necessary. It has been demonstrated that contraceptive counseling by trained care providers in the immediate postpartum period, or as part of comprehensive care after pregnancy loss, increases women's uptake and their partner's support for contraceptives [1]. Appropriate birth spacing after a previous live birth or pregnancy loss decreases the risk for prematurity in subsequent pregnancies [21, 22].

Although contraceptive use, particularly amongst adolescents, currently falls far short of the optimal with only 56% of the demand for family planning satisfied among the Countdown to 2015 priority countries [23], the renewed interest in family planning and contraceptive commodity security (UK Govt Family Planning Summit held in July 2012, UN Commission on life-saving Commodities for Women and Children) gives an unprecedented opportunity to scale up use of contraception and allows for women and partners to plan their pregnancy. Strategies for improving coverage, especially in low-resource settings, are urgently needed and require vigorous research.

Optimize pre-pregnancy weight

Optimizing weight before pregnancy is recommended, since weight gain or loss during pregnancy increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Monitoring nutritional status through measurement of women's body mass index prior to pregnancy is feasible, even in low-income contexts, and should be used as a baseline to develop a regimen for healthy eating and physical activity to optimize their weight.

Women who are underweight before pregnancy (body mass index less than 18.5 kg/m2) are at significantly greater risk of having premature, low birth weight newborns [24]. Given that maternal undernourishment is a risk factor for being underweight, improving food security could reduce the rates of preterm birth, especially in impoverished nations. It is important, therefore, to evaluate whether local and national food programs largely targeted towards children could be replicated for adolescent girls and women.

Obesity is a problem of increasing magnitude globally with estimated 300 million women of reproductive age who are obese [25]. Overweight and obese women (body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2) have a higher risk for preterm births [26, 27]. While existing evidence indicates that weight loss at any age is difficult to achieve and sustain, successful programs for women in their reproductive years reaffirm that women can overcome environmental pressures like easy access to low-cost, high-calorie foods and develop healthy eating habits. These programs promote dietary modification and increased physical activity through sustained daily changes, with the help of a support system and regular monitoring [28–36]. Women should be encouraged to include moderate physical activity in their daily routine to improve weight and cardiovascular status before pregnancy and reduce the likelihood of developing weight-related complications during gestation [37]. Programs should be tailored to women's weight at baseline and their lifestyle, to build motivation and increase the chances of sustaining weight loss.

Promote healthy nutrition including supplementation/fortification of essential foods with micronutrients

Studies of the biological mechanismsleading to preterm birth indicate that more severe congenital disorders, including neural tube defects, might result in preterm delivery [38]. Consuming a multivitamin containing 400 μg of folic acid in the preconceptional period is the best way to ensure adequate micronutrient intake to help prevent neural tube and other birth defects [39]. Multi-vitamin supplementation reduces the risk of congenital malformations (e.g., neural tube, congenital heart, urinary tract and limb defects) by 42-62% and the risk of preeclampsia by 27%. Folic acid supplementation or fortification reduces the risk of neural tube defects by 53% [1]. Although folic acid is known to protect against neural tube defects, there is little evidence to show that folic acid supplementation alone reduces the risk for preterm birth [40]. In addition, providing folic acid supplementation to all women of childbearing age poses a major logistical challenge. In middle- and low-income countries, iron and folic acid supplementation reaches fewer than 30% of women [41]. Even in the United States where there are aggressive promotional campaigns, only 1 in 3 women of childbearing age takes a vitamin with folic acid daily [42].

For this reason, iron and folic acid fortification of foods for mass consumption is considered an important strategy to increase micronutrient levels in the population. A number of countries have already opted to increase population folic acid intake through inexpensive, large-scale fortification, which has proven to be moderately effective and safe [43–57]. However, legislation for mandatory fortification of food staples has still not been enacted in many countries. Further information is needed on other and multiple micronutrients in relation to preconception care especially among adolescent girls

Promote vaccination of children and adolescents

Infections transmitted around the time of conception or during pregnancy may result in preterm birth [58]. Not only does infection, especially with rubella virus, increase the risk for prematurity, it may lead to other devastating consequences such as congenital rubella syndrome or miscarriage [39, 59, 60]. Many of these infections could be prevented through routine childhood vaccinations. However, the rubella vaccine can also be given at least 3 months prior to pregnancy to women who are not already immune [61]. Vaccination campaigns against rubella have been able to increase coverage for adolescent girls and women [62–66].

Preconception care services for women with special risk factors that increase the risk for preterm birth

Screen for, diagnose and manage mental health disorders and prevent intimate partner violence

Maternal stressors such as depression, socioeconomic hardship and intimate partner violence have been linked to preterm birth [67–71]. It has been hypothesized that physical and psychological stress acts through inflammatory pathways involving maternal cortisol to cause premature birth [72, 73]. Importantly, when such risks are present before pregnancy they are likely to continue throughout pregnancy as well. Moreover, women with psychosocial stressors have a greater likelihood of engaging in risky behaviors such as smoking and alcohol use and are less likely to seek health care [74, 75]. Risky sexual behaviors also put these women at greater risk for unintended pregnancies and STIs [76–78]. Interventions to improve the psychological health of women before conception have included group counseling and development of coping and economic skills. These have shown some promise in reducing risk, but so far have not demonstrated reductions in adverse birth outcomes including prematurity. Further research in this area is needed since the burden of mental health disorders -- particularly depression, anxiety and somatic disorders -- is high in women, and the safety of some medications used to manage these conditions during pregnancy is unclear. A Joint Statement by the American Psychiatric Association and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology indicates that the higher risk of preterm birth may be related to depression itself, or the antidepressants used for treatment [79]. Behavioral therapy for couples before marriage, for men who have been violent with their partners, and for married couples in a violent relationship has shown a reduction in aggression, largely in more severe forms of violence [80–83]. Two programs that integrated interventions for domestic violence and substance use also showed some success, however, the effect generally faded with time [84, 85].

Prevent and treat STIs, including HIV/AIDS

Reducing the incidence of infectious diseases, particularly syphilis, is a high priority to lower the rates of stillbirths and preterm birth [86]. A number of interventions have been piloted in various countries to prevent and treat STIs, especially since such interventions also impact teen pregnancy, HIV/AIDS and contraceptive use. Focusing interventions on high-risk groups, including women, adolescents and intravenous drug users, can effectively reduce the transmission of STIs to the population in general and subsequently reduce preterm births and stillbirths [87, 88]. Behavioral and counseling interventions may lead to a 25% rise in the practice of safe sexual behaviors and a 35% drop in the incidence of STIs [1]. Mass treatment interventions with antibiotics also have been shown to decrease the prevalence of STIs by one-fifth [89–91]. Counseling and behavioral interventions that focus on educating women are especially crucial, given that women are physically more vulnerable to contracting a STI during intercourse than men, and are less likely to have the ability to negotiate safe behaviors with their partners such as condom use [92]. Focused interventions for preventing the broad range of STIs may be helpful in preventing preterm births, though more research is needed.

Promote cessation of tobacco use and restrict exposure to secondhand smoke

Cigarette smoking approximately doubles the threat of preterm birth [93]. Despite the risk of fetal growth restriction and preterm birth [94–96], a survey of women in low- and middle-income countries found that many pregnant women currently used tobacco or were exposed to secondhand-smoke [97]. A few studies have shown, however, that preconception counseling and the involvement of husbands or partners in smoking cessation programs can increase the number of women who quit smoking before pregnancy [98, 99]. In many instances even when women themselves do not use tobacco, they are exposed to environmental tobacco smoke and indoor air pollution; interventions and regulatory measures must therefore target male partners and behavioral change on a wider level to minimize women's exposure.

Screen for, diagnose and manage chronic diseases

In the United States alone, 12% of women of reproductive age suffer from diabetes and hypertension [100]. Although testing and treatment for women diagnosed with such medical problems prior to pregnancy are cost-effective and prevent further complications for the mother and baby, they do not necessarily lower the incidence of preterm births [10]. For example, achieving good control of diabetes through counseling, weight management, diet and insulin administration could reduce the risk of perinatal mortality and congenital disorders by approximately 70%, but does not significantly lower the rate of preterm birth among diabetic mothers [1]. At any contact with health care services, women of reproductive age should, therefore, be asked about other medical conditions and the use of medications particularly about anti-epileptic drugs. Women with epilepsy not only face the possible risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes as a result of the teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs upon the developing fetus but also the potential direct effects of maternal seizures on the developing fetus. Until adequate control of the medical condition is achieved, women should be educated about the possible risks to themselves and their newborn, and be encouraged to use effective contraception [101]. Multivitamin supplementation for women with chronic medical conditions is especially important because it has been shown to lower their risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes [102]. For women with other chronic conditions, such as cardiorespiratory disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, hypertension and renal disease, a cesarean birth may be indicated leading to the a baby being born prematurely; however, even in such cases, achieving optimal control of the condition before pregnancy may lead to better long-term outcomes for the mother and newborn.

Limitations of the evidence

The growing interest in preconception care is fairly recent; thus, there are limited data specific to the period prior to and between pregnancies, particularly relating to preterm birth risks and outcomes. Risk factors and interventions that have been studied only in adolescents or only during pregnancy also may be relevant in the preconception period. For instance, exposure to indoor air pollution during pregnancy leads to 20% more stillbirths and low birth weight babies [103]. Yet many women are exposed to biomass smoke and second-hand tobacco smoke long before pregnancy is established. Similarly, interventions such as smokeless stoves or smoking cessation programs that reduce overall levels of exposure also would benefit women who later become pregnant. For many women, a positive pregnancy test is a stimulus to cease smoking, yet most women require multiple attempts to quit. Smoking cessation programs for adult men and women have been evaluated and demonstrate higher rates of women who quit before or during the first trimester [104]. Given the strong evidence of risk for preterm birth and low birth weight with tobacco use in pregnancy, it may be inferred that fewer women smoking translates to lower rates of preterm birth.

Many interventional studies in the preconception period report different health outcomes, which is also the case for studies on pregnancy and childbirth [105]. This precludes a complete assessment of the impact that an intervention could have on multiple pregnancy outcomes. For instance, research to reduce the prevalence of STIs among women may assess safe sexual behaviors or rates of transmission as outcomes; however, many studies do not indicate how many women later became pregnant or change in rates of preterm birth.

Until now, preconception care has been provided through three avenues: pre-pregnancy health visits for couples contemplating pregnancy; programs to increase awareness, screening and management for a particular risk; or participatory women's groups in the community. The diversity of contexts and risks among adolescent girls and women will require that preconception care be tailored to different settings and groups. The approaches used are a step in the right direction; but could be broadened to include earlier health care and health promotion for women and couples and address risks more holistically.

Program opportunities to scale up

There is widespread agreement that in order to reduce maternal and childhood mortality, a continuum of care needs to be provided and that actions are needed at the community, primary care and referral care levels to deliver this continuum [4]. Packages of interventions to improve maternal and newborn health have been developed; yet, these focus largely on care during pregnancy and after birth [106]. However, it is important to realize that most of the health risk behaviors that are emphasized during pregnancy are generally the ones that are advised before pregnancy. Steering the action from preconception period will improve gearing the risk factors soonest and can lead to profound benefits for health and well-being of women and couples and improve subsequent pregnancy and child health outcomes. Tracking progress and scaling up delivery of preconception interventions has been a challenge, with preconception initiatives in individual countries delivering different services to different segments of the population (women, couples or adolescents).

In some high-income countries, such as the United States, Hungary, Australia and the Netherlands, an attempt has been made to provide preconception care to couples of reproductive age through family physicians or a special preconception clinic [98, 107–111]. Evidence-based recommendations for the content of preconception care also have been published [2, 112–114], and components have been incorporated into major national and international health guidelines [11, 115]. In the United States, a website has been developed to support clinical education and practice in this area http://www.beforeandbeyond.org.

In some countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal), women's support groups have been teaching birth preparedness to women and their partners [101, 116–119]. Many large-scale trials for individual preconception interventions also have been carried out in low- and middle-income countries. While individual settings will require context-specific approaches to providing preconception care, a number of effective and culturally-acceptable interventions already exist. An example of an opportunity to build on existing programs is the integration of interconception health into home visits during the postnatal period.

The evidence base for risks and interventions before conception is still being strengthened because preconception care, as noted, is a relatively new concept. Therefore, an agreed-upon package of evidence-based interventions and opportunities for scale up in the preconception period has yet to be decided.

Priorities for research for preconception care

There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of preconception care in reducing preterm births, which presents a major barrier for reducing the global burden of preterm birth. Since preconception care is still an emerging field across the research pipeline--from description to delivery, development and discovery--there is much to be done (Table 3). A research priority-setting exercise was conducted to list and rank important research options in preconception care, with 76 technical experts systematically and transparently scoring 381 options using the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method [120]. The list of research priorities (Table 4) emphasizes improvement and delivery of existing interventions to women in contexts with constrained resources, since the highest burden of maternal and child mortality and morbidity including preterm births occurs amongst women of lower socio-economic status. Experts in maternal and child health strongly suggest operational research to improve nutrition; prevent adolescent pregnancy; increase uptake of contraception; screen for chronic conditions (such as hypertension and anemia); treat infectious diseases (notably HIV/AIDS); and update immunizations during the preconception period. Experts also advocated for scaling up coverage of effective interventions through integration of preconception interventions with other platforms and programs; task-shifting to community health workers; utilizing cell phones and information technologies; improving the supply chain for preconception care commodities; and maximizing uptake by adolescents.

Table 3 Research priorities for preterm outcomes related to preconception
Full size table
Table 4 The top research priorities based on the expert CHNRI process for preconception care in low- and middle-income countries to reduce maternal and child mortality and morbidity
Full size table

For some important risk factors that have been identified, epidemiologic data are lacking. National, regional and global databases are needed that track adolescent girls and women exposed to a particular risk (for example pre-pregnancy underweight, anemia or infection) and rates of preterm birth in high-risk versus healthy mothers. Additionally, monitoring systems must be in place to evaluate the effect of introducing or scaling up interventions on the incidence of preterm birth and other pregnancy outcomes. Epidemiologic measurement is critical to establish goals, track progress and compare intervention strategies. Replicating these interventions in larger studies of adolescent girls and women before first pregnancy, or between pregnancies, is needed to assess the relative benefit that may be obtained through preconception care across different populations.

There is a need for discovery research to further elucidate the etiology of preterm birth and identify ways to screen women. There is also a great need for innovative interventions and new ways to implement existing interventions, especially ways to assess and reduce exposure to risk factors that are not directly amenable to medical intervention, such as environmental pollution.

The development of national and international guidelines specific to preconception care would increase the visibility of the issue for health care providers and the population in general. While there is need for a defined and tested preconception care package, that can be adapted to various settings and models of service delivery at scale, much is still undiscovered, both in terms of what interventions work to reduce risks such as pre-pregnancy underweight and obesity or mental health problems and how to integrate effective preconception interventions into broader programs and initiatives across the continuum of RMNCH.

The interventions with proven benefit and national data, such as family planning, require further operational research including how to maximize provision of preconception care in the healthcare setting and community, and how to promote uptake by adolescents and women particularly those who are at high-risk for a preterm birth. The feasibility of scaling up preconception interventions will need to be assessed, including improvements to infrastructure, supply chain and health management systems also may increase coverage of preconception services.

Piloted interventions to improve the health of adolescent girls and women, which can lead to prevention of preterm birth, are often not categorized as preconception care; thus, they present a missed opportunity for linking to preterm birth research. Continued research will be necessary to identify tailored interventions for women from different strata and with different risk profiles within the same communities. There also is need to develop simple, accessible and user-friendly ways to provide individualized preconception care to women in contexts where resources are lacking or where health systems are weaker.

Addressing contextually-relevant ways to increase demand for and access to preconception care services is especially necessary in developing countries. While many countries have implemented behavior change strategies to increase awareness on birth preparedness and women's empowerment, more strategies for assessing benefit particularly for preterm birth are needed, especially culturally appropriate ways to involve adolescent boys, men and communities.

Even with current tools used to diagnose disease such as hypertension, the development of simpler, cost-effective diagnostic tests will enable efficient point-of-care testing with timely results and minimize the need for multiple visits. Likewise, affordable, easy-to-administer preventive and treatment options that are woman-friendly are in demand, such as oral insulin or better female-controlled contraceptive methods. With the knowledge gaps for preconception care, there is room for testing innovative technology and for implementation research.

Prescription for action

Although preconception care is now recognized as a way to better the health of women and couples and improve pregnancy and newborn outcomes, a package of essential preconception interventions has not yet been agreed upon, nor is there global consensus on how to incorporate preconception care into the overall maternal, newborn and child health strategy. A meeting was organized by the World Health Organization in early 2012 to meet these objectives, and develop an action plan for moving the agenda for preconception care forward [121]. The meeting brought together leading researchers in the field, individuals with programmatic implementation experience of preconception care, and a number of organizations working to improve maternal and child health worldwide who were interested in developing an action plan for preconception care. There was a strong sense of the importance of preconception care, and a common understanding of preconception care as part of a continuum of care to improve the health of adolescents, women, couples of reproductive age, mothers, newborns and children. It was agreed that there is a need to distinguish between proximal preconception care that would occur one to two years before conception and distal preconception care that would extend even earlier, since the target populations and interventions for each may differ. Target population groups should include all women and men of reproductive age who may or may not be currently contemplating pregnancy with special efforts to reach vulnerable groups such as adolescent girls, those who are socioeconomically marginalized, and couples with previous adverse reproductive and pregnancy outcomes. It is important to specifically target adolescent and young women because health habits initiated during that period of age have profound impact on future health and their future pregnancy outcomes. Risky behaviors such as use of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs are significant challenges to their health, while, risky sexual behavior put them at high risk for unintended pregnancy and HIV/STIs. It was emphasized that preconception care is needed in low- and middle-income countries which have the highest burden of maternal and child mortality and morbidity, but it also relevant and important for women in high-income countries who are socioeconomically deprived. Further, all participants wanted to agree on an essential package of preconception interventions, with the possibility for regions and countries to select additional preconception care services and delivery strategies based on contextual factors. It would therefore be important that preconception care programs are documented, evaluated and disseminated so that others can learn from such experiences in adapting preconception care services to their setting.

Effective preconception interventions that decrease maternal and child mortality and morbidity should be delivered using appropriate methods that include health education, vaccination, nutritional supplementation and food fortification, contraceptive information and services, screening and management of medical and social risk factors. There are certain risk factors which lead to some behavioral effects and complex outcomes. To illustrate, risky sexual behavior and cases of intimate partner violence are higher among those who consume alcohol and are also involved in substance abuse. Disentangling these factors and effects may be difficult. Hence ameliorating these linked risk factors and behaviors can prevent a host of factors for poor pregnancy outcomes. In the health care setting, an essential package of interventions and a checklist of risk factors to be screened for might be a feasible starting point. In some countries, mandatory screening for hereditary diseases before marriage drastically reduced rates of thalassemia, and whether preconception care could be delivered through a similar means has not been explored [122]. Packaging these interventions further ensures translation of knowledge into action. The packages feature opportunities for delivery and highlight the implementation of intervention packages via existing health care and public health programs. A package of existing antenatal program, for example, if includes preconception care can be an effective strategy in low-income countries and would capture a wide audience. School health and reproductive health programs, on the other hand, can guide adolescent as to how to make responsible decisions concerning their sexual lives, as well as how to practice safe sex, and how to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

Provision of preconception care must also be extended beyond those who are traditionally involved in women's health, by incorporating the concept into training for current and future health care providers. For some risks, such as chronic diseases, until diagnosis and treatment can become more affordable, policymakers and donor organizations must work in conjunction to make screening and care widely available. Increasing coverage of postpartum care would also help to improve women's health in future pregnancies, for example, through the integration of preconception care in postnatal home visits. Men are critical and equal partners in family planning and reproductive health practices and their involvement in preconception care can bring positive outcomes. They play a major role in supporting women with which they can not only foster healthy practices but can also discourage risky behaviors such as smoking and intake of alcohol in their partners. Furthermore involving males can exert positive impact on their own behaviors and practices and hence influence the family at large.

National preconception care services will depend on local resources, health systems and existing public health strategies or maternal and child programs. The WHO will recommend a package of essential preconception interventions that are evidence-based, universally relevant (for example family planning and optimization of maternal nutritional status) and that can be delivered even in resource-poor settings. A list of action points that were posited and additional points especially related to reducing the rates of preterm birth, are shown in Table 5.

Table 5 Actions before and between pregnancy to reduce the risk of preterm birth
Full size table

Also of importance will be the encouragement of dialogue and collaboration with other sectors -- for example, education food and agriculture and telecommunications and media -- which are already engaged with young people of preconception age to promote greater demand for preconception care, and to reach girls, women and couples beyond the health care system. In some cases, integrated programs have already been shown to be feasible and effective, such as youth development programs, contraceptive provision in school for adolescents and incorporating maternal health into child vaccination days. It is also essential to develop a way to involve men, community leaders, volunteers and families in support for and provision of preconception care.

Conclusion

Until recently, the provision of care to women and couples before and between pregnancies to improve maternal and newborn health has not had sufficient priority on the RMNCH continuum of care. As with research, care must focus increasingly "upstream" from birth if the true potential for prevention of preterm birth is to be realized. Effective preconception care involves a broad variety of partners, including men, health care providers, youth leaders and community volunteers; and delivery sites such as schools, primary health care facilities and community centers. Outreach and awareness must begin in adolescence if it is to truly improve the health of women and newborns and reduce the rates of prematurity. If tackled, however, with vigorous and evidence-based interventions, preconception care offers the earliest opportunity to reduce risk, allowing women to enter pregnancy in the best possible health and to have the greatest chance of giving birth to a healthy baby.

References

  1. Bhutta ZA, Dean SV, Imam AM, Lassi ZS: A Systematic Review of Preconception Risks and Interventions. 2011, The Aga Khan University

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson K, Posner SF, Biermann J, Cordero JF, Atrash HK, Parker CS, Boulet S, Curtis MG, Group CAPCW, Select Panel on Preconception C: Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care - United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006, 55: 1-23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Howson C, Kinney M, Lawn J: Born Too Soon: Preterm birth matters. Reproductive Health. 2013,

    Google Scholar 

  4. Institute of Medicine: Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. 2007, Washington, DC: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wise PH: Transforming preconceptional, prenatal, and interconceptional care into a comprehensive commitment to women's health. Women's Health Issues. 2008, 18: S13-S18. 10.1016/j.whi.2008.07.014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kerber KJ, de Graft-Johnson JE, Bhutta ZA, Okong P, Starrs A, Lawn JE: Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery. Lancet. 2007, 370: 1358-1369. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R: Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Studies in family planning. 2010, 41: 241-250. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barros FC, Bhutta ZA, Batra M, Hansen TN, Victora CG, Rubens CE: Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (3 of 7): evidence for effectiveness of interventions. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010, 10: S3-10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S3.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R: Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008, 371: 75-84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iams JD, Romero R, Culhane JF, Goldenberg RL: Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008, 371: 164-175. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60108-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. PMNCH: A Global Review of the Key Interventions Related to Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (RMNCH). Geneva, Switzerland: The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health. 2011

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gavin LE, Catalano RF, David-Ferdon C, Gloppen KM, Markham CM: A review of positive youth development programs that promote adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2010, 46: S75-S91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guttmacher Institute: Into a new world: young women's sexual and reproductive lives. New York, AGI. 1998

    Google Scholar 

  14. WHO: WHO Guidelines on Preventing Early Pregnancy and Poor Reproductive Outcomes Among Adolescents in Developing Countries. 2011, Geneva Switzerland: WHO, [http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241502214_eng.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  15. DiCenso A, Guyatt G, Willan A, Griffith L: Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal. 2002, 324: 1426-10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1426.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oringanje C, Meremikwu MM, Eko H, Esu E, Meremikwu A, Ehiri JE: Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancy among adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 11 (11): Art. No.: CD005215

    Google Scholar 

  17. Corcoran J, Pillai VK: Effectiveness of secondary pregnancy prevention programs: A meta-analysis. Research on Social Work Practice. 2007, 17: 5-18. 10.1177/1049731506291583.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harden A, Brunton G, Fletcher A, Oakley A, Burchett H, Backhans M: Young people, pregnancy and social exclusion: A systematic synthesis of research evidence to identify effective, appropriate and promising approaches for prevention and support. 2006

    Google Scholar 

  19. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC: Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA. 2006, 295: 1809-1823. 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsui AO, McDonald-Mosley R, Burke AE: Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiologic reviews. 2010, 32: 152-10.1093/epirev/mxq012.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah PS, Zao J: Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta analyses. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2009, 116: 1425-1442. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02278.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM, Breman R, Brockman SC, Rosas-Bermudez A: Effect of the interpregnancy interval after an abortion on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005, 89: S34-S40.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Requejo JH, Bryce J, Deixel A, Victora C: Accountability for Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival: An update on progress in priority countries. World Health Organization. 2012

    Google Scholar 

  24. Han Z, Mulla S, Beyene J, Liao G, McDonald SD: Maternal underweight and the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2011, 40: 65-10.1093/ije/dyq195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. WHO: Obesity and Over weight: Factsheet No 311. 2011, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  26. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Beyene J: Overweight and obesity in mothers and risk of preterm birth and low birth weight infants: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ. 2010, 341:

    Google Scholar 

  27. Torloni MR, Betren AP, Daher S, Widmer M, Dolan SM, Menon R, Bergel E, Allen T, Merialdi M: Maternal BMI and preterm birth: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2009, 22: 957-970. 10.3109/14767050903042561.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eiben G, Lissner L: Health Hunters-an intervention to prevent overweight and obesity in young high-risk women. International journal of obesity. 2005, 30: 691-696.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Faucher MA, Mobley J: A Community Intervention on Portion Control Aimed at Weight Loss in Low-Income Mexican American Women. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2010, 55: 60-64. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.03.014.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Amorim Adegboye AR, Linne YM, Lourenco PMC: Diet or exercise, or both, for weight reduction in women after childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 3 (3): Art. No.: CD005627

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chang MW, Nitzke S, Brown R: Design and Outcomes of a Mothers In Motion Behavioral Intervention Pilot Study. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2010, 42: 11-21. 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.01.010.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Galtier F, Raingeard I, Renard E, Boulot P, Bringer J: Optimizing the outcome of pregnancy in obese women: from pregestational to long-term management. Diabetes & metabolism. 2008, 34: 19-25. 10.1016/j.diabet.2007.12.001.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kinnunen TI, Pasanen M, Aittasalo M, Fogelholm M, Weiderpass E, Luoto R: Reducing postpartum weight retention - a pilot trial in primary health care. Nutrition Journal. 2007, 6: 21-10.1186/1475-2891-6-21.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mediano MFF, Barbosa JSO, Moura AS, Willett WC, Sichieri R: A randomized clinical trial of home-based exercise combined with a slight caloric restriction on obesity prevention among women. Preventive Medicine. 2010, 51: 247-252. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.07.012.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ostbye T, Krause KM, Lovelady CA, Morey MC, Bastian LA, Peterson BL, Swamy GK, Brouwer RJN, McBride CM: Active Mothers Postpartum:: A Randomized Controlled Weight-Loss Intervention Trial. American journal of preventive medicine. 2009, 37: 173-180. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.016.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rock CL, Flatt SW, Sherwood NE, Karanja N, Pakiz B, Thomson CA: Effect of a Free Prepared Meal and Incentivized Weight Loss Program on Weight Loss and Weight Loss Maintenance in Obese and Overweight Women. JAMA. 2010, 304: 1803-10.1001/jama.2010.1503.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gavard JA, Artal R: Effect of exercise on pregnancy outcome. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008, 51: 467-10.1097/GRF.0b013e31816feb1d.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Honein MA, Kirby RS, Meyer RE, Xing J, Skerrette NI, Yuskiv N, Marengo L, Petrini JR, Davidoff MJ, Mai CT: The association between major birth defects and preterm birth. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2009, 13: 164-175. 10.1007/s10995-008-0348-y.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Christianson A, Howson C, Modell B: March of Dimes Global Report on Birth Defects: the hidden toll of dying and disabled children. New York: March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. 2006

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bukowski R, Malone FD, Porter FT, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Hankins GD, Eddleman K, Gross SJ, Dugoff L, Craigo SD: Preconceptional folate supplementation and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a cohort study. PLoS Med. 2009, 6: e1000061-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000061.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. PAHO: Flour Fortification with Iron, Folic Acid and Vitamin B12: Regional Meeting Report. 2004, Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  42. March of Dimes & Gallup Organization: Folic Acid and the Prevention of Birth Defects. 2005, 17-

    Google Scholar 

  43. CDC: Spina bifida and anencephaly before and after folic acid mandate: United States, 1995 -1996 and 1999-2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2004, 53: 362-365.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Calvo EB, Biglieri A: Impact of folic acid fortification on women nutritional status and on the prevalence of neural tube defects. Archivos argentinos de pediatría. 2008, 106: 492-498.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Modell B, Lawn J: Folic acid to reduce neonatal mortality from neural tube disorders. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2010, 39: i110-10.1093/ije/dyq028.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. De Wals P, Rusen ID, Lee NS, Morin P, Niyonsenga T: Trend in prevalence of neural tube defects in Quebec. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology. 2003, 67: 919-923. 10.1002/bdra.10124.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gucciardi E, Pietrusiak MA, Reynolds DL, Rouleau J: Incidence of neural tube defects in Ontario, 1986-1999. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2002, 167: 237-

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Mathews TJ, Erickson JD, Wong LYC: Impact of folic acid fortification of the US food supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. Jama. 2001, 285: 2981-10.1001/jama.285.23.2981.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu S, West R, Randell E, Longerich L, O'Connor KS, Scott H, Crowley M, Lam A, Prabhakaran V, McCourt C: A comprehensive evaluation of food fortification with folic acid for the primary prevention of neural tube defects. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2004, 4: 20-10.1186/1471-2393-4-20.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. López Camelo JS, Orioli IM, Dutra MG, Nazer Herrera J, Rivera N, Ojeda ME, Canessa A, Wettig E, Fontannaz AM, Mellado C: Reduction of birth prevalence rates of neural tube defects after folic acid fortification in Chile. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2005, 135: 120-125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Persad VL, Van den Hof MC, Dube JM, Zimmer P: Incidence of open neural tube defects in Nova Scotia after folic acid fortification. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2002, 167: 241-

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ray JG, Meier C, Vermeulen MJ, Boss S, Wyatt PR, Cole DEC: Association of neural tube defects and folic acid food fortification in Canada. Lancet. 2002, 360: 2047-2048. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11994-5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sadighi J, Sheikholeslam R, Mohammad K, Pouraram H, Abdollahi Z, Samadpour K, Kolahdooz F, Naghavi M: Flour fortification with iron: a midterm evaluation. Public health. 2008, 122: 313-321. 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sayed AR, Bourne D, Pattinson R, Nixon J, Henderson B: Decline in the prevalence of neural tube defects following folic acid fortification and its cost benefit in South Africa. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology. 2008, 82: 211-216. 10.1002/bdra.20442.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Simmons CJ, Mosley BS, Fulton Bond CA, Hobbs CA: Birth defects in Arkansas: Is folic acid fortification making a difference?. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology. 2004, 70: 559-564. 10.1002/bdra.20063.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Williams LJ, Mai CT, Edmonds LD, Shaw GM, Kirby RS, Hobbs CA, Sever LE, Miller LA, Meaney FJ, Levitt M: Prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly during the transition to mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States. Teratology. 2002, 66: 33-39. 10.1002/tera.10060.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Williams LJ, Rasmussen SA, Flores A, Kirby RS, Edmonds LD: Decline in the prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly by race/ethnicity: 1995-2002. Pediatrics. 2005, 116: 580-10.1542/peds.2005-0592.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Goldenberg RL, Epstein FH, Hauth JC, Andrews WW: Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. New England journal of medicine. 2000, 342: 1500-1507. 10.1056/NEJM200005183422007.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Cutts FT, Robertson SE, Diaz-Ortega JL, Samuel R: Control of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in developing countries, Part 1: Burden of disease from CRS. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1997, 75: 55-

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Robertson SE, Cutts FT, Samuel R, Diaz-Ortega JL: Control of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in developing countries, Part 2: Vaccination against rubella. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1997, 75: 69-

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Coonrod DV, Jack BW, Boggess KA, Long R, Conry JA, Cox SN, Cefalo R, Hunter KD, Pizzica A, Dunlop AL: The clinical content of preconception care: immunizations as part of preconception care. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008, 199: S290-S295. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.061.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gudnadóttir M: Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for prevention of congenital rubella infection: a practical example from Iceland. Review of Infectious Diseases. 1985, 7: S200-10.1093/clinids/7.Supplement_1.S200.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Su SB, Guo HR: Seroprevalence of rubella among women of childbearing age in Taiwan after nationwide vaccination. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2002, 67: 549-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Menser MA, Hudson JR, Murphy AM, Upfold LJ: Epidemiology of congenital rubella and results of rubella vaccination in Australia. Review of Infectious Diseases. 1985, 7: S37-10.1093/clinids/7.Supplement_1.s37.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Miller CL, Miller E, Sequeira PJ, Cradock-Watson JE, Longson M, Wiseberg EC: Effect of selective vaccination on rubella susceptibility and infection in pregnancy. British medical journal (Clinical research ed). 1985, 291: 1398-10.1136/bmj.291.6506.1398.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang I: Seroprevalence of rubella infection after national immunization program in Taiwan: vaccination status and immigration impact. Journal of medical virology. 2007, 79: 97-103. 10.1002/jmv.20764.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Austin MP, Leader L: Maternal stress and obstetric and infant outcomes: epidemiological findings and neuroendocrine mechanisms. Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2000, 40: 331-337. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2000.tb03344.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Coker AL, Sanderson M, Dong B: Partner violence during pregnancy and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004, 18: 260-269. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00569.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, Das A, Elder N, Swain M, Norman G, Ramsey R, Cotroneo P, Collins BA, Johnson F: The preterm prediction study: Maternal stress is associated with spontaneous preterm birth at less than thirty-five weeks' gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996, 175: 1286-1292. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70042-X.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hegarty K, Gunn J, Chondros P, Small R: Association between depression and abuse by partners of women attending general practice: descriptive, cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal. 2004, 328: 621-10.1136/bmj.328.7440.621.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Sharps PW, Laughon K, Giangrande SK: Intimate partner violence and the childbearing year. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2007, 8: 105-10.1177/1524838007302594.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Challis JRG, Smith SK: Fetal endocrine signals and preterm labor. Biology of the Neonate. 2001, 79: 163-167.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wadhwa PD, Culhane JF, Rauh V, Barve SS: Stress and preterm birth: neuroendocrine, immune/inflammatory, and vascular mechanisms. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2001, 5: 119-125. 10.1023/A:1011353216619.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Schoenborn CA, Horm J: Negative moods as correlates of smoking and heavier drinking: implications for health promotion. Advance data. 1993, 1-

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zuckerman B, Amaro H, Bauchner H, Cabral H: Depressive symptoms during pregnancy: relationship to poor health behaviors. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1989, 160: 1107-1111. 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90170-1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Bauer HM, Gibson P, Hernandez M, Kent C, Klausner J, Bolan G: Intimate partner violence and high-risk sexual behaviors among female patients with sexually transmitted diseases. Sexually transmitted diseases. 2002, 29: 411-10.1097/00007435-200207000-00009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Bonomi AE, Thompson RS, Anderson M, Reid RJ, Carrell D, Dimer JA, Rivara FP: Intimate partner violence and women's physical, mental, and social functioning. Am J Prev Med. 2006, 30: 458-466. 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.01.015.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Seth P, Raiford JL, Robinson LSS, Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ: Intimate partner violence and other partner-related factors: correlates of sexually transmissible infections and risky sexual behaviours among young adult African American women. Sexual Health. 2010, 7: 25-30. 10.1071/SH08075.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Yonkers KA, Wisner KL, Stewart DE, Oberlander TF, Dell DL, Stotland N, Ramin S, Chaudron L, Lockwood C: The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2009, 31: 403-413. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.04.003.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Feder L, Forde DR: Test of the efficacy of court Mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The Broward Experiment, Executive Summary. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. 2000

    Google Scholar 

  81. Markman HJ, Renick MJ, Floyd FJ, Stanley SM, Clements M: Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: A 4-and 5-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1993, 61: 70-

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. O'Leary KD, Heyman RE, Neidig PH: Treatment of wife abuse: A comparison of gender-specific and conjoint approaches. Behavior Therapy. 1999, 30: 475-505. 10.1016/S0005-7894(99)80021-5.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Simpson LE, Atkins DC, Gattis KS, Christensen A: Low-level relationship aggression and couple therapy outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology. 2008, 22: 102-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Rychtarik RG, McGillicuddy NB: Coping skills training and 12-step facilitation for women whose partner has alcoholism: effects on depression, the partner's drinking, and partner physical violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005, 73: 249-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Scott MC, Easton CJ: Racial differences in treatment effect among men in a substance abuse and domestic violence program. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse. 2010, 36: 357-362. 10.3109/00952990.2010.501131.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Donders GG, Desmyter J, De Wet DH, Van Assche FA: The association of gonorrhoea and syphilis with premature birth and low birthweight. Genitourinary medicine. 1993, 69: 98-101.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Over M, Piot P: HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 1993, 455-527.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Wasserheit JN, Aral SO: The dynamic topology of sexually transmitted disease epidemics: implications for prevention strategies. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1996, 174: 201-213. 10.1093/infdis/174.Supplement_2.S201.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Kamali A, Quigley M, Nakiyingi J, Kinsman J, Kengeya-Kayondo J, Gopal R, Ojwiya A, Hughes P, Carpenter LM, Whitworth J: Syndromic management of sexually-transmitted infections and behaviour change interventions on transmission of HIV-1 in rural Uganda: a community randomised trial. Lancet. 2003, 361: 645-652. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12598-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Mayaud P, Mosha F, Todd J, Balira R, Mgara J, West B, Rusizoka M, Mwijarubi E, Gabone R, Gavyole A: Improved treatment services significantly reduce the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in rural Tanzania: results of a randomized controlled trial. Aids. 1997, 11: 1873-10.1097/00002030-199715000-00013.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Wawer MJ, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Paxton LA, Kiwanuka N, Wabwire-Mangen F, Li C, Lutalo T, Nalugoda F: Control of sexually transmitted diseases for AIDS prevention in Uganda: a randomised community trial. Lancet. 1999, 353: 525-535. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)06439-3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Mize SJS, Robinson BE, Bockting WO, Scheltema KE: Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions for women. AIDS care. 2002, 14: 163-180. 10.1080/09540120220104686.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Andres RL, Day M-C: Perinatal complications associated with maternal tobacco use. Seminars in Neonatology. 2000, Elsevier, 231-241.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Cnattingius S: The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2004, 6: S125-S140.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Honein MA, Rasmussen SA, Reefhuis J, Romitti PA, Lammer EJ, Sun L, Correa A: Maternal smoking and environmental tobacco smoke exposure and the risk of orofacial clefts. Epidemiology. 2007, 18: 226-10.1097/01.ede.0000254430.61294.c0.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Siero FW, Van Diem MT, Voorrips R, Willemsen MC: Periconceptional smoking: an exploratory study of determinants of change in smoking behavior among women in the fertile age range. Health Education Research. 2004, 19: 418-10.1093/her/cyg048.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Bloch M, Althabe F, Onyamboko M, Kaseba-Sata C, Castilla EE, Freire S, Garces AL, Parida S, Goudar SS, Kadir MM: Tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure during pregnancy: an investigative survey of women in 9 developing nations. Journal Information. 2008, 98:

    Google Scholar 

  98. Elsinga J, de Jong-Potjer LC, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, le Cessie S, Assendelft WJJ, Buitendijk SE: The effect of preconception counselling on lifestyle and other behaviour before and during pregnancy. Women's Health Issues. 2008, 18: 117-125. 10.1016/j.whi.2008.09.003.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Park EW, Schultz JK, Tudiver F, Campbell T, Becker L: Enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, 3: CD002928-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Dunlop AL, Jack BW, Bottalico JN, Lu MC, James A, Shellhaas CS, Hallstrom LH-K, Solomon BD, Feero WG, Menard MK: The clinical content of preconception care: women with chronic medical conditions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008, 199: S310-S327. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.031.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Tripathi A, Rankin J, Aarvold J, Chandler C, Bell R: Preconception Counseling in Women With Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33: 586-10.2337/dc09-1585.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Mahmud M, Mazza D: Preconception care of women with diabetes: a review of current guideline recommendations. BMC Women's Health. 2010, 10: 5-10.1186/1472-6874-10-5.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Pope DP, Mishra V, Thompson L, Siddiqui AR, Rehfuess EA, Weber M, Bruce NG: Risk of low birth weight and stillbirth associated with indoor air pollution from solid fuel use in developing countries. Epidemiologic reviews. 2010, 32: 70-81. 10.1093/epirev/mxq005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Floyd RL, Jack BW, Cefalo R, Atrash H, Mahoney J, Herron A, Husten C, Sokol RJ: The clinical content of preconception care: alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug exposures. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008, 199: S333-S339. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Requejo J, Althabe F, Merialdi M, Keller M, Katz J, Menon R: Born Too Soon: Care during pregnancy and childbirth. Reproductive Health. 2013,

    Google Scholar 

  106. WHO: Package of interventions for family planning, safe abortion care, maternal, newborn and child health. 2010, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  107. Czeizel AE: Ten years of experience in periconceptional care. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 1999, 84: 43-49. 10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00246-2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Lumley J, Donohue L: Aiming to increase birth weight: a randomised trial of pre-pregnancy information, advice and counselling in inner-urban Melbourne. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 299-10.1186/1471-2458-6-299.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Hillemeier MM, Weisman CS, Chase GA, Dyer AM, Shaffer ML: Women's preconceptional health and use of health services: Implications for preconception care. Health services research. 2008, 43: 54-75.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Jack BW, Culpepper L, Babcock J, Kogan MD, Weismiller D: Addressing preconception risks identified at the time of a negative pregnancy test. A randomized trial. The Journal of family practice. 1998, 47: 33-

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Moos MK, Bangdiwala SI, Meibohm AR, Cefalo RC: The impact of a preconceptional health promotion program on intendedness of pregnancy. American Journal of Perinatology. 1996, 13: 103-108. 10.1055/s-2007-994302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Jack BW, Atrash H, Coonrod DV, Moos MK, O'Donnell J, Johnson K: The clinical content of preconception care: an overview and preparation of this supplement. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008, 199: S266-S279. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.067.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Berghella V, Buchanan E, Pereira L, Baxter JK: Preconception care. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010, 65: 119-131. 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181d0c358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Korenbrot CC, Steinberg A, Bender C, Newberry S: Preconception care: a systematic review. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2002, 6: 75-88. 10.1023/A:1015460106832.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Victora CG, Rubens CE: Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (4 of 7): delivery of interventions. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010, 10: S4-10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S4.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Midhet F, Becker S: Impact of community-based interventions on maternal and neonatal health indicators: Results from a community randomized trial in rural Balochistan, Pakistan. Reproductive Health. 2010, 7: 30-10.1186/1742-4755-7-30.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Azad K, Barnett S, Banerjee B, Shaha S, Khan K, Rega AR, Barua S, Flatman D, Pagel C, Prost A: Effect of scaling up women's groups on birth outcomes in three rural districts in Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010, 375: 1193-1202. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60142-0.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Bhutta ZA, Soofi S, Cousens S, Mohammad S, Memon ZA, Ali I, Feroze A, Raza F, Khan A, Wall S: Improvement of perinatal and newborn care in rural Pakistan through community-based strategies: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2011, 377: 403-412. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62274-X.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Manandhar DS, Osrin D, Shrestha BP, Mesko N, Morrison J, KM TS, Thapa S, Shrestha D, Thapa B: Effect of participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster randomised control trial. Lancet. 2004, 364: 970-979. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17021-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Dean S, Rudan I, Althabe F, Girard AW, Howson C, Langer A, Lawn J, Reeve M-E, Teela KC, Toledano M: Setting research priorities for preconception care in low-and middle-income countries: aiming to reduce maternal and child mortality and morbidity. PLoS Medicine. 2013, 10: e1001508-10.1371/journal.pmed.1001508.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Dean S, Bhutta Z, Mason E, Howson C, Chandra-Mouli V, Lassi Z, Imam A: Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. Chater 3: Care before and between pregnancy. Edited by: Howson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE. 2012, Geneva: March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children, World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  122. Samavat A, Modell B: Iranian national thalassaemia screening programme. BMJ. 2004, 329: 1134-10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1134.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. WHO: Adolescent pregnancy: unmet needs and undone deeds-A review of the literature and programmes. 2007, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  124. Haldre K, Rahu K, Karro H, Rahu M: Is a poor pregnancy outcome related to young maternal age? A study of teenagers in Estonia during the period of major socio-economic changes (from 1992 to 2002). European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2007, 131: 45-51. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.05.002.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Mehra S, Agrawal D: Adolescent health determinants for pregnancy and child health outcomes among the urban poor. Indian Pediatr. 2004, 41: 137-145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Paranjothy S, Broughton H, Adappa R, Fone D: Teenage pregnancy: who suffers?. Archives of disease in childhood. 2009, 94: 239-245. 10.1136/adc.2007.115915.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Ekwo EE, Moawad A: Maternal age and preterm births in a black population. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2000, 14: 145-151. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00234.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Hediger ML, Scholl TO, Schall JI, Krueger PM: Young maternal age and preterm labor. Annals of epidemiology. 1997, 7: 400-406. 10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00046-X.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Khashan AS, Baker PN, Kenny LC: Preterm birth and reduced birthweight in first and second teenage pregnancies: a register-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010, 10: 36-10.1186/1471-2393-10-36.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Sharma V, Katz J, Mullany LC, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Shrestha SR, Darmstadt GL, Tielsch JM: Young maternal age and the risk of neonatal mortality in rural Nepal. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2008, 162: 828-10.1001/archpedi.162.9.828.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Parker B, McFarlane J, Soeken K: Abuse during pregnancy: effects on maternal complications and birth weight in adult and teenage women. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1994, 84: 323-328.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB: The world report on violence and health. Lancet. 2002, 360: 1083-1088. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11133-0.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Jejeebhoy SJ: Associations between wife-beating and fetal and infant death: impressions from a survey in rural India. Studies in Family Planning. 1998, 300-308.

    Google Scholar 

  134. UNICEF: Progress for children: a world fit for children statistical review. New York, NY. 2007, UNICEF

    Google Scholar 

  135. Blanc AK, Tsui AO, Croft TN, Trevitt JL: Patterns and trends in adolescents' contraceptive use and discontinuation in developing countries and comparisons with adult women. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2009, 63-71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article has been published as part of Reproductive Health Volume 10 Supplement 1, 2013: Born too soon. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/supplements/10/S1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, USA

    Sohni V Dean

  2. World Health Organization, Switzerland

    Elizabeth Mary Mason

  3. March of Dimes Foundation, USA

    Christopher P Howson

  4. Aga Khan University, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan

    Zohra S Lassi, Ayesha M Imam & Zulfiqar A Bhutta

  5. The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

    Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Authors
  1. Sohni V Dean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Mary Mason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher P Howson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zohra S Lassi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ayesha M Imam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zulfiqar A Bhutta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zulfiqar A Bhutta.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

12978_2013_233_MOESM1_ESM.doc

Additional file 1: In line with the journal's open peer review policy, copies of the reviewer reports are included as additional file 1. (DOC 56 KB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dean, S.V., Mason, E.M., Howson, C.P. et al. Born Too Soon: Care before and between pregnancy to prevent preterm births: from evidence to action. Reprod Health 10 (Suppl 1), S3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S3

Keywords

  • Intimate Partner Violence
  • Family Planning
  • Preterm Birth
  • Adolescent Girl
  • Risky Sexual Behavior

Reproductive Health

ISSN: 1742-4755