Skip to main content

The experience of women infected by the COVID-19 during pregnancy in Brazil: a qualitative study protocol

Abstract

Background

The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is highly infectious, with the recent World Health Organization decree confirming a global public health emergency. The outcomes related to maternal and fetal health among pregnant women infected with the virus are still poorly understood. The world population has been waiting for answers and remains constantly alert about the pandemic’s progress. It is not yet known what impact this pandemic experience will have on the population’s mental health, especially pregnant women.

Method

We aim to understand and discuss the experiences of women who were infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy, in relation to the illness process, community relations, and social media influences. This is a qualitative study in which we will interview women who were infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy and received medical care from a tertiary university hospital specializing in women’s health in Brazil. We will use the techniques of Semi-Directed Interviews of Open and In-depth Questions, socio-demographic and health data sheets, and Field Diaries. We will use purposive sampling and the criterion of theoretical saturation for its construction. The interviews will be conducted by phone or video call, with audio recorded for later transcription. The treatment of the data will be completed through Thematic Analysis and discussed in light of the Health Psychology framework, with the production of categories that answer the proposed research questions.

Discussion

It is expected that the results contribute to the understanding about the demands that come to the health professional of women infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy in a pandemic situation.

Resumo em Português (Portuguese abstract)

Introdução

A doença causada pelo coronavírus (COVID-19) é altamente infecciosa, com a recente declaração da Organização Mundial de Saúde confirmando emergência global de saúde pública. Os desfechos relacionados a saúde materno-fetal entre gestantes infectadas pelo vírus ainda são pouco conhecidos. A população mundial tem aguardado respostas e se mantém constantemente em alerta sobre o progresso da pandemia. Ainda não se sabe qual será o impacto da experiência da pandemia sobre a saúde mental da população, especialmente entre mulheres grávidas.

Método

O objetivo deste estudo é compreender e discutir as experiências de mulheres infectadas pelo COVID-19 durante a gravidez, em relação ao processo de adoecimento, às relações comunitárias e a influência de mídias sociais. Este é um estudo qualitativo em que serão entrevistadas mulheres infectadas pelo COVID-19 durante a gestação, atendidas em um hospital universitário terciário especializado em saúde da mulher no Brasil. Serão usadas as técnicas de Entrevistas Semi-Dirigidas de Perguntas Abertas em Profundidade, ficha de dados sociodemográficos e de saúde e diários de campo. A amostra será selecionada intencionalmente, usando o critério de saturação teórica para a sua construção. As entrevistas serão conduzidas por telefone ou videoconferência, com áudio gravado para posterior transcrição. O tratamento dos dados seguirá a Análise Temática e os resultados serão discutidos sob conceitos de Psicologia da Saúde, com a produção de categorias que respondam as questões de pesquisa propostas.

Discussão

Espera-se que os resultados contribuam para a compreensão de demandas emergentes entre profissionais de saúde para mulheres infectadas pelo COVID-19 durante a gestação em situação de pandemia.

Plain English summary

The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is highly infectious. The World Health Organization recently decreed a global public health emergency. Scientists are still investigating, but we still know little about the outcomes of maternal and fetal health of pregnant women infected with the virus. The world population has been waiting for answers and remains constantly alert about the pandemic’s progress. It is not yet known what impact this pandemic experience will have on the population’s mental health, especially pregnant women. We will conduct a research project and pregnant women during the next months.

We aim to understand and discuss the experiences of women who were infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy, in relation to the illness process, community relations, and the social media influences. We will interview women who were infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy and received medical care from a tertiary university hospital specializing in women’s health in Brazil. We will use Interviews and In-depth Questions, socio-demographic and health data sheets, and Field Diaries. The interviews will be conducted by phone or video call, with audio being recorded for later transcription. The data will be analyzed systematically, using specific and well stablished methods to do so. We will produce a textual report with categories that answer the proposed research questions.

We believe the results will contribute to the health, professional, and political considerations of managing mental health demands coming from the women infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy in a pandemic situation.

Background

The severe acute respiratory syndrome–novel coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), also known as COVID-19, has been considered an emergency in public health worldwide. Since this pandemic disease was reported by the first time in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, more than 2 million people have tested positive globally and almost 140 thousand have died [1, 2]. At this moment, the virus has been documented in every continent, with expressive outbreaks in Italy and New York. In Brazil, there are 291,579 confirmed cases and 18,859 deaths since the last report of the World Health Organization published in May 22nd, 2020 examining community transmission [3].

Scientific data regarding this new disease are rapidly accumulating [4,5,6,7]. Descriptions of epidemiological issues, incubation periods, pharmacological treatment, clinical course, risk factors, and several other evidences are being producing at the same time the world is struggling to minimize the damage. Early data about the general population suggest 80% of cases mild, 14% develop more severe symptoms, and 6% develop critical illness. The group most at risk includes individuals who are older than 50 years, those have chronic illnesses (i.e., heart disease and diabetes), and those who have chronic respiratory conditions (i.e. asthma) [7, 8]. Estimates show that one contagious person can infects between 2.2 and 2.4 other people [5]. Available data suggest the length of the incubation period of the virus is about 5 days, but it may range from 2 to 14 days [4].

Many questions are still being answered by researchers, including whether there is an effective pharmacological therapy to treat infected people [9]. The clinical outcomes associated with COVID-19 in pregnant women and babies are still uncertain. There is not enough data to confirm if the pregnant women are at a higher risk of deaths or respiratory complications associated with the virus, or if there they have an increased risk for premature delivery or other perinatal complications and vertical transmission. This is the third reported spillover of an animal coronavirus to human beings in the last two decades. Previous descriptions point to the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), diseases associated with severe perinatal outcomes, such as miscarriage, premature delivery, intrauterine growth restriction, and maternal death [10].

On the other hand, at this time, pregnant women are not considered a risk group for developing COVID-19 compared with the general population [10, 11]. But this information should be handled carefully because there are few epidemiological and clinical information for this group.

Researchers have been focusing on the technical-scientific mechanisms of the disease. In addition to the scientific community, the world population has been waiting for answers and remains alert and aware of the advances of the pandemic, with its routines altered or paralyzed to avoid contagion accelerated by human gatherings. People watch the news paralyzed as they see messages about the alarming number of people infected, the frequent deaths, and the collapse of the health system in some countries, overloaded by the number of serious cases that require hospitalization. There is some discussion arising regarding the panic spread by social media, through the dissemination of misinformation, conflicting information, and manipulated information [12,13,14].

The reactions are diverse: panic, anxiety, indifference, and the sense of awe at the extreme measures of social isolation required by the most world authorities. Emerging infectious diseases and pandemics may affect directly the women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights [15]. It is not yet known what impact this pandemic experience will have on the population’s mental and reproductive health, especially pregnant women, who will be the object of the study presented here.

There is a consensus that, during pregnancy, women are faced with major physical, psychological, and emotional changes, with ambiguous feelings, changing roles, doubts and, often, situations of vulnerability. The World Health Organization (WHO) has been pointing to the relevance of maternal mental health, indicating that around 10% of pregnant women and 13% of postpartum women in the world have some mental illness, primarily depression. In developing countries, these percentages may be even higher (15.6% during pregnancy and 19.8% after delivery). In addition to the risk of suicide, affected women may not function properly with regard to baby care and other activities, with consequences for the child’s overall and emotional development [16].

Pandemics like this are a source of anxiety, sadness, and fear. In addition to pregnancy and the uncertain scenario related to the disease, pregnant women infected with COVID-19 may be experiencing intense psychological suffering, which can cause serious consequences in terms of mental health. In this sense, understanding the experience of pregnant women infected by COVID-19 is an important issue for the development of intervention strategies for the promotion, prevention, and restoration of comprehensive health in this population. We aim to explore the emotional experiences of these pregnant women in regard to the illness process, their community relations, and the influence of social media.

Method

We aim to understand the experiences of women infected by the COVID-19 during pregnancy. We will explore their emotional perceptions concerning the illness process during the gestational period in regard their own and babies’ health, how they emotionally manage the recovery period, the treatment and the quarantine, and also the relationships with health services and professionals. We intend to understand the women’s perceptions about their family and community relationships after receiving a diagnosis, namely, their perceptions about the neighborhood, friends, co-workers, and other immediately related people. Finally, we propose to explore the influence of social media and newscasts on pregnant women’s feelings about the COVID-19 infection. Figure 1 demonstrates the theoretical model of the aims.

Fig. 1
figure1

The theoretical model of the aims to be explored in the research

We will conduct a qualitative approach to achieve the aims of the study, using in-depth interviews and thematic analysis. This study protocol follows the criteria of the COREQ Checklist [17].

Participants

We will include women infected by COVID-19 during the gestational period who are 18 years old or more. They must be emotionally and cognitively capable of verbally communicating in order to participate in the study and symptoms must be remitted at the time of data collection. As exclusion criteria, we will consider illiteracy, psychiatric/neurological or other illnesses that make it impossible to answer question, and participants who do not agree to have their interviews recorded. The purposive sampling will consider the concept of theoretical saturation, proposed by Glaser and Strauss [18], which means we will include new participants until data has reached sufficient consistency to meet the initial objectives.

Setting

The participants will be recruited at a tertiary university hospital specializing in the women’s health. The hospital is from the public health system in the Brazilian Southeast. The hospital comprises more than 100 cities, containing 5 million people. It is a reference center for high-risk pregnancies. Since the first case notified in Brazil (February 27, 2020), the health team has been preparing to provide specialized assistance in the fight against the pandemic.

Instruments

We will use three instruments for data collection: (1) Semi-Directed Interviews of Open and In-depth Questions; (2) Sociodemographic and Health Data Sheets; and (3) Field Diaries. The interview script will start with the trigger question: “Tell me how you are experiencing this pregnancy”. The complete list of questions designed for the study is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 The interview script

The Data Sheet will be self-referred or checked in the medical record. The sociodemographic information will include: age, schooling, religion, marital status, household composition, occupation/paid work, family income, and race. The health data will include symptoms of COVID-19 (fever, coryza, odynophagia, myalgia, diarrhea, meningoencephalitis, myocarditis, respiratory failure, others), symptom onset date, date when the pregnant woman first sought hospital admittance from symptoms of COVID-19, duration of the hospitalization and when needed, and resources and details of the medical treatment (e.g., drugs, artificial respirators). We will also collect obstetric information, including gestational age or delivery date, number of pregnancies, number of deliveries, history of miscarriages, maternal pathologies (i.e. diabetes, cardiopathy, HIV, others), and obstetrics pathologies (i.e. gestation diabetes, hypertension/ eclampsia, oligoamine, etc.).

The field diary is a systematic instrument of observation, in which the researcher examines the global behavior of the participant along with the interview. It contains non-verbal communication, including the personal presentation of the participant, her global behavior, body expressions, gestures, facial expressions, style and alterations in speech (silences, choking speech, lapses of the language, inhibited and uninhibited placements, changes in timbre and volume of voice), laughter, smiles, cries, and similar manifestations.

Data collection procedures

Due to the social isolation in Brazil owing to COVID-19, every contact with the participants will be done virtually, through phone calls or videoconferences. The eligible women will be provided by one researcher (FGS), a medical doctor involved in person in the health assistance of the patients at the hospital. Another researcher (JVFJ)—a psychologist with experience in qualitative interviews and pregnancy—will conduct the data collection. Aiming to achieve a random sample, the interviewer will select the eligible patients from the listed names randomly.

First, eligible women will be contacted by telephone, and the researcher will invite them to participate in the study. The researcher will set out the procedures and terms of participation in the research. Thereafter, the researcher will send the consent form by e-mail or by a messaging app, according to the women’s preference, that must be answered by the participant if she agrees to participate. To aid in participant understanding, the researcher will send a video presenting the full consent term.

Data collection will be performed by videoconference or telephone call. We will audio record every interview. At the time of recording, participants will be invited to verbally offer their consent to participate in the study. Data from the patient’s medical record will be accessed later to verify information referring to the problems of contamination by COVID-19.

The virtual contact with the participant requires a particular attention on the appropriate rapport for the interview, especially regarding the environment around the women during data collection. We will recommend an appropriate, quiet, and private room where the participants may stay during the whole interview, so they will be able to express themselves more comfortably. The interviewer, on the same way, must assure confidentiality during data collection, using a private and quiet place to conduce the interviews. Moreover, it’s important to emphasize to them that we are not expecting a correct answer for the questions and we are interested on how the woman are truly feeling truly, with no judgment involved. After finishing the interview script, we will ask the participants if they want to say something else.

Data analysis

We will transcribe verbatim the audio-recorded interviews. The concepts of medical psychology will be brought up for discussion. The data analysis will be conducted by two researchers independently (JVFJ and LR). We will discuss the categorization process with the co-authors and with the research team from the SARHAS Group (Research Group on Reproductive Health and Healthy Habits) that belongs to the School of Medical Sciences of the University of Campinas.

The data analysis will follow the thematic analysis, proposed by Nowell et al. [19], in which the textual data, produced from the transcription of the interviews, the field diaries, and the data sheet (when applicable), will go through a process of coding the raw data until reaching the consistency of themes. The step-by-step and description of each analysis phase is shown in Table 2. The NVIVO software will be used, which contributes to the organization and textual analysis through the simple frequency of words in the code formulation phase, validating the analyzes performed by the researchers.

Table 2 The Thematic Analysis

Trustworthiness and Limitations

We will consider the four strategies for ensuring trustworthiness: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability [20]. We will also consider the COREQ Checklist for reporting qualitative research.

In regard the limitations of this study, we consider that every qualitative research project chooses a specific methodological model that offers a point of view among other possibilities of approaching the research questions. Moreover, a cross-sectional study takes place at a specific moment in the lives of the participants, in which conflicts may emerge in different psychological and relational points. However, the validity of the study is not compromised.

Discontinuation and Ethical Issues

This study protocol received ethical approval from the local committee and follows the Declaration of Helsinki and the national legislation. Both the researcher and participant will be free to interrupt or suspend the interview in situations in which they perceive that the approach is negatively affecting the patients’ emotional state. Participants may withdraw from the study at any time, without justification, and without affecting the service they receive at the hospital.

Discussion

This study will shine light on the lived experience of women infected by the COVID-19 during pregnancy. We have not found other studies adopting this approach, and the results will make valuable contributions to health care services and policy, especially for understanding the personal context, the immediate social context, and the expanded social context influencing the feelings of this women. This is important due to the relevance of the COVID-19 pandemic and may offer insights for health professionals and police makers.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-novel coronavirus

COVID-19:

Coronavirus

References

  1. 1.

    Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727–33. Cited 2020 Mar 30. Available from. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Situation Report-123. 2020. Available from: https://www.icao.int/Security/COVID-19/EBandSL/eb027e.pdf. Cited 2020 May 23.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, Jones FK, Zheng Q, Meredith HR, et al. The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application. 2020; Available from: https://zenodo.org/record/3692048. Cited 2020 Apr 18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kucharski AJ, Russell TW, Diamond C, Liu Y, Edmunds J, Funk S, et al. Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):553–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. 2020. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/jautimm. Cited 2020 Apr 18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Articles Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395. Cited 2020 Apr 18. Available from. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 www.thelancet.com.

  8. 8.

    Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir. 2020;8:e21. Cited 2020 Apr 18. Available from. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sanders JM, Monogue ML, Jodlowski TZ, Cutrell JB. Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA. 2020; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32282022. Cited 2020 Apr 18.

  10. 10.

    Rasmussen SA, Smulian JC, Lednicky JA, Wen TS, Jamieson DJ. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Pregnancy: What obstetricians need to know. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; Cited 2020 Mar 30. Available from. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.017.

  11. 11.

    Dotters-Katz SK, Hughes BL. Considerations for Obstetric Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Perinatol. 2020; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303077.

  12. 12.

    Larson HJ. The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation. Nature. 2018;562:309 Nature Publishing Group.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lancet T. COVID-19: fighting panic with information. 2020; Available from: www.nytimes.com/2020/02/15/. Cited 2020 Apr 18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Depoux A, Martin S, Karafillakis E, Preet R, Wilder-Smith A, Larson H. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. J Travel Med. 2020;27(3):taaa031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chattu VK, Yaya S. Emerging infectious diseases and outbreaks: implications for women’s reproductive health and rights in resource-poor settings. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    WHO | Maternal mental health. Available from: https://www.who.int/mental_health/maternal-child/maternal_mental_health/en/. Cited 2020 Mar 30.

  17. 17.

    Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19(6):349–57 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17872937. Cited 2018 Mar 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction: New Brunswick; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis : striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf. 2004;22:63–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors JVFJ and LR received doctoral scholarships by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES). The protocol was not peer reviewed.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the overall study design and specific methodologies. All authors approved the final version for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernanda Garanhani Surita.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Declaration of Helsinki and Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council are being followed. Women who are 18 years old or more will be invited to the study and will be included after reading the consent form. The researcher will explain the consent form and will inform them that they can withdraw from the study without any harm or loss. The study data will be used for the sole purpose of this study, and a commitment will be made to maintain confidentiality as to the identity of the interviewees in the disclosure of the data. This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Commission of UNICAMP under the number CAAE: 30721120.8.0000.5404.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freitas-Jesus, J.V., Rodrigues, L. & Surita, F.G. The experience of women infected by the COVID-19 during pregnancy in Brazil: a qualitative study protocol. Reprod Health 17, 108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00958-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Coronavirus
  • Pandemic
  • Pregnant women
  • qualitative study
  • Feelings
  • Psychology
  • Social media
  • Family relations
  • Community relations